Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to Postharvest handling and technologies for livestock products(20)

Advertisement

More from ILRI(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

Postharvest handling and technologies for livestock products

  1. Postharvest handling and technologies for livestock products Delia Grace Program Leader Animal and Human Health, International Livestock Research Institute, Kenya The 1st All Africa Postharvest Congress 30 March 2017 Nairobi, Kenya ILRI/Stevie Mann
  2. Animalsourcefoods: 5of6highestvalueglobalcommodities (totalvalueofthesefive:overUSInt$700billion) FAOSTAT 2015 (values for 2013) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 0 50 100 150 200 250 Production(MT)millions Netproductionvalue(Int$)billion net production value (Int $) billion production (MT) Cattle meat $171 billion
  3. Gains in meat consumption in developing countries are outpacing those of developed 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 1980 1990 2002 2015 2030 2050 Millionmetrictonnes developing developed developing at same per cap. as developed (hypothetical)
  4. SSA - 2000 3% 3% 4% 47% 16% 3% 24% Meat Dairy Fruit & Vegetables Cereals Roots & Tubers Dryland crops Others Source: Herrero et al 2008 Africa: 1billion consumers: high potential to consume more livestock products Europe - 2000 10% 11% 5% 31% 5% 1% 37% Meat Dairy Fruit & Vegetables Cereals Roots & Tubers Dryland crops Others Europe: ASF 21% of diet SS Africa: ASF 6% of diet Diet composition Diet composition By 2050: 2 billion consumers
  5. Characteristics Benefits No effective health and safety regulations; Many actors; Pay no tax; Traditional processing & retail practices; Poor infrastructure; Little support from public sector or NGO. Cheap; Fresh; Local breeds; Taste; Trust vendors; Credit. INFORMAL MARKETS More than 80% of perishables bought from informal markets
  6. 6 Milk (cow) Production: men (x Nairobi) Processing: women Marketing: women (x Abidjan) Consumed: both Poultry Production: women Processing: women Marketing: women Consumed: both Milk (goat) Production: men (w milk) Processing: women Marketing: women Consumed: both Beef/goat Production: men (w assist) Processing: m Marketing: m (butcher, pub) Consumed: both Pigs Production: women Processing: men Marketing: men Consumed: both Fish, crabs Fishing: men Processing: women Marketing: women) Consumed: both Role of women in post- harvest activities
  7. Increasing concerns over food safety Jabar et al, Lapar et al In 7 developing countries studied • Many/most reported concern over food safety (40-97%) • Willing to pay 5-10% premium for food safety • Younger, wealthier, town-residing, supermarket-shoppers willing to pay more for safety • Buy 20-40% less during animal health scares
  8. Foods implicated in FBD Painter et al., 2013, Sudershan et al., 2014, Mangan et al., 2014; Tam et al., 2014; Sang et al., 2014 ; ILRI, 2016 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% UK Netherlands India Vietnam USA China Animal source food Produce Other
  9. Post-harvest solutions Add value Create trust Reduce waste Create employment for women & youth
  10. Treated nets: reduce disease
  11. Dairy value chain in Assam • Concerns about milk quality in Assam • Training to promote knowledge and hygiene amongst producers and traders 11 2009 2012 2009-2011
  12. Capacity-building, awareness, incentives Training on hygienic milk production and handling Along the dairy value chain: producer, trader Media and information campaigns Peer to peer monitoring & evaluation Incentive: good publicity & membership dairy platform 12
  13. • Better knowledge & practices. • Less mastitis • Higher revenues • Greater consumeer trust in milk • 70% of traders in Assam are currently registered • It benefited the economy by $6 million a year in Assam • 1.5 million consumers benefiting from safer milk
  14. Improvements are feasible, efffective,affordable • Branding & certification of milk vendors in Kenya: led to improved milk safety & saved economy $33 million • Peer training, branding, innovation for Nigerian butchers led to 20% more meat samples meeting standards and cost $9 per butcher but resulted in savings $780/per butcher per year from reduced COI 14
  15. The presentation has a Creative Commons licence. You are free to re-use or distribute this work, provided credit is given to ILRI. better lives through livestock ilri.org
Advertisement