A participatory assessment of disease burden, morbidity and mortality from five priority livestock diseases in Nigeria
12/20/2012 1
A PARTICIPATORY ASSESSMENT OF DISEASE BURDEN,
MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY FROM FIVE PRIORITY
LIVESTOCK DISEASES IN NIGERIA.
BY
DR MARIAT .O. SOLEYE
RESIDENT NFELTP
NIGERIA.
PAPER PRESENTED AT 1ST PENAPH WORKSHOP
CHAING MAI, THAILAND
11TH - 13TH, DECEMBER
2012
INTRODUCTION
• Livestock are asset to the poor and majority
kept in the rural sector of Nigeria
• Livestock are traditionally kept in 3 major
production system
• Highest number are kept by rural people in
semi intensive system
12/20/2012 2
INTRODUCTION…2
• Animal diseases of varying morbidity and
mortality threatens the livestock sector in
Nigeria
• Animal associated disease burden is
controllable, preventable and treatable
• Disease burden is sum of direct cost of the
disease
• PE gives an accurate estimates as it involves
the producers directly
12/20/2012 3
INTRODUCTION
• Federal department of livestock prioritized
six(6) diseases for control and eradication.
• They are
– Contagious Bovine pleuropneumonia
– African swine fever
– Highly pathogenic avian influenza
– Newcastle disease
– Foot and mouth disease
– Peste des petites ruminant
12/20/2012 4
OBJECTIVES
• Assess the impact of livestock diseases on
livelihood
• To make recommendations on the feasibility
of targeted interventions
12/20/2012 5
Methodology…1
• Participatory rapid assessment – used to
obtain information on epidemiology and
impact of the diseases
• Done in 4 agro ecological zones
– Sudan savannah (Kano state)
– Northern guinea savannah (Niger state)
– Sub-humid zone (Enugu state)
– Humid zone (Oyo state)
12/20/2012 6
MAP OF NIGERIA SHOWING THE STATES IN THE
ECOLOGICAL ZONES
12/20/2012 8
Methodology…2
• A checklist was developed
• Questions and exercises were standardized
• Clinical case definitions were developed for
the 5 diseases
• Village was the unit of analysis
• Villages were selected non randomly
• Permission was sort from leaders
12/20/2012 9
Methodology…3
• Qualitative and quantitative information were
gathered using the following tools
a) Semi structured interview
b) Proportional piling
c) Simple ranking
d) Relative incidence scoring
12/20/2012 10
Methodology…4
• SSI was used to determine
– Livelihood activities
– Production challenges
– Production cost, control and treatment cost
Simple ranking was used to determine
– Order of importance of livestock kept in terms of
number and relative importance
12/20/2012 11
Methodology…5
• Proportional piling used to determine
– Importance of each disease in terms of prevalence
and economic importance
– Age distribution on herds and flocks
– Mortality rates by age
– Estimate annual livestock level
– Incidence and impact of livestock diseases
12/20/2012 12
Methodology…6
• Relative incidence scoring was used to
estimate
– Incidence of each disease in each spp over the last
year
– Case fatality, morbidity and mortality rates
All data gathered were fed into a spreadsheet model
12/20/2012 13
RESULTS…1
• Total of 56 interviews were done
– 18 in humid zones
– 21 in semi humid zones
– 10 in Northern guinea savannah
– 7 in Sudan savannah
12/20/2012 14
Results…4
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
Total Survey (n=55) Oyo/Lagos (n=18) Kano (n=6) Niger (n=10) Enugu (n=21)
AverageScore
Importance of Livestock Species in Terms of Village Populations in Four Agro-ecozones in
Nigeria
Cattle (n=22)
Sheep (n=37)
Goats (n=39)
Pigs (n=19)
Chickens (n=47)
Ducks (n=8)
Turkeys (n=3)
Guinea Fowl (n=8)
Other (n=13)
12/20/2012 17
Results…5
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
CBPP tryps FMD GI parasites ectoparasites calf diarrhea Other
%
Relative Herd Incidence of Cattle Diseases from May '09 - April '10 in Four Agro-
ecozones of Nigeria
Total Survey (n=20)
Oyo/Lagos (n=5)
Kano (n=5)
Niger (n=6)
Enugu (n=4)
12/20/2012 18
Results…6
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Total Survey Oyo/Lagos Kano Niger Enugu
Relative Impact on Livelihoods of Cattle Diseases from May '09 - April '10 in Four Agro-
ecozones of Nigeria
CBPP (n=12)
tryps (n=14)
FMD (n=16)
GI parasites (n=5)
ectoparasites (n=4)
calf diarrhea (n=5)
Other (n=11)
12/20/2012 19
Discussion…1
• Livestock keeping is practiced by all the
villages surveyed
• Nearly half reported sole livelihood support is
from farming
• This highlights the importance of farming to
livelihood and survival in rural Nigeria
12/20/2012 26
Discussion…2
• Regional variation in species ranking in terms
of population exists
• Little regional variation in terms of impact on
livelihood
• Chickens are the most numerous species kept
• Cattle make the greatest contribution to
livelihood
• Pigs were not numerous but ranked 2nd most
important
12/20/2012 27
Discussion…3
• Livestock diseases pose a critical challenge to
production in 4 agro ecological zones
• FMD has high incidence in cattle in all regions
• ASF has the highest relative incidence in pigs
– Case fatality of100%
– Morbidity and mortality of 15%
PPR most occurring disease in small ruminants
Morbidity and mortality of 23% and 10%
respectively, case fatality of 36- 94%
12/20/2012 28
Conclusion/Recommendation
• Farmers perception of importance of disease
is its effect on livelihood
• Assistance to farmers to overcome limitations
to production will contribute greatly to
improving livelihood
• Control of diseases should be a package
involving private and public sector
• Veterinary practice be closer to the farm level
12/20/2012 30
Acknowledgement
• Dr Chris Jost( International Livestock Research
Institute)
• International Livestock Research Institute
office, Ibadan, Nigeria
• International Livestock Research Institute
research support group
• Drs Uju Okafor, Tinuke Ahamed, Waziri Musa,
Ibrahim Musa and Ndahi Mwapu
12/20/2012 31