Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to Participatory approaches for evaluating surveillance systems: Insights from a training-related study from Vietnam(20)

More from ILRI(20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded(20)

Participatory approaches for evaluating surveillance systems: Insights from a training-related study from Vietnam

  1. Participatory Epidemiology Network for Animal and Public Health First Technical Workshop 11-13 December 2012, Chiang Mai, Thailand Participatory approaches for evaluating surveillance systems Insights from a training-related study from Vietnam Antoine-Moussiaux, N.1,2, Vu, M.Q.G.1, Delabouglise, A.1, Thi, T.P.H.1,3, Peyre, M.1, Binot, A.1, Baudon, E.1, Calba, C., Valeix, S.1, Nguyen, T.T.4, Phan, D.T.5, Noopataya, S.6 and Jost C.7 1 CIRAD, AGIRs Research Unit, Montpellier, France 2 Tropical Veterinary Institute, University of Liege, Belgium 3 National Institute of Animal Science, Hanoi, Vietnam 4 National Institute for Veterinary Research, Hanoi, Vietnam 5 Faculty of Animal Science and Aquaculture, Hanoi University of Agriculture, Vietnam 6 Dept of Livestock Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Thailand 7 EcoServe Solutions, Kenya
  2. Animal Health Surveillance ...some thoughts from Economic social sciences Social National level Informal surveillance Drivers Province Political District Epidemiological Commune Call for Interdisciplinarity Farmers 2 PENAPH First Technical Workshop. 11-13 December 2012, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  3. The project... “To report or not to report?” • Individual decision- maker • Under influence • Both financial and social factors of the decision Loss of reputation Responsibility Stigmatization Loss of trust Acceptability PENAPH First Technical Workshop. 11-13 December 2012, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  4. Why Participatory Epidemiology ? • Need to talk... – with the decision-makers (at all levels)... – about animal diseases... • Need to be open to discovery... – Qualitative data are crucially needed – Quantitative too (evaluation) – Diversity and uniqueness of situations – Hence, flexible methods • Need to build interdisciplinarity... PENAPH First Technical Workshop. 11-13 December 2012, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  5. Why participatory epidemiology ? • Need to build interdisciplinarity – Build a common language – Build a common approach PENAPH First Technical Workshop. 11-13 December 2012, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  6. Some fears/questions before training Will it be a problem Will it be possible for Vietnamese to speak about people to talk in such a sensitive groups ? topic ? Will it be possible How to build upon to share a common PE to fit to our language between concerns ? disciplines ? How specific should we be, regarding the diseases and species addressed ? PENAPH First Technical Workshop. 11-13 December 2012, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  7. The training • 12 researchers (Vietnam, Thailand, France, Belgium) – Epidemiology, anthropology, economics • Aims – Provide basic PE principles and tools – Catalyze interdisciplinarity – Build upon PE for adapted tools • 10 days – 5 days classroom – 5 days field PENAPH First Technical Workshop. 11-13 December 2012, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  8. The field study Zone Luong Dien Commune, Cam Giang District, Hai Duong Province, Vietnam Objective estimate the occurrence and reporting of sudden death in poultry Hypothesis sudden death occurs in flocks but are not always reported PENAPH First Technical Workshop. 11-13 December 2012, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  9. First learning outputs... • Yes, people were willing to speak about animal diseases... Even sudden death in poultry • To get their attention, talk about the species that interest them... – You want to know about chickens? Ask about pigs! – Regarding decision-making, we get interesting information from comparison between species • Flexibility was experienced at the first day! Why do some people not report cases ? => Why do some people report ? • The need to step down and acknowledge the farmer’s expertise PENAPH First Technical Workshop. 11-13 December 2012, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  10. Some difficulties... PENAPH First Technical Workshop. 11-13 December 2012, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  11. Some difficulties... • Data management – Data recording ! – Data aggregation – Data analysis Standardisation Flexibility PENAPH First Technical Workshop. 11-13 December 2012, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  12. Some difficulties... • Time management PENAPH First Technical Workshop. 11-13 December 2012, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  13. Building upon PE... PENAPH First Technical Workshop. 11-13 December 2012, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  14. Building upon PE... • Get the focus on – social aspects – Health information rather than disease itself • Some tracks to adapt tools – Tree-PP for semi-quantification of declaration – MS adapted to cross “social impact” and “diseases” or “case disclosure” – Flow diagram and PP for “social network analysis” • Change of it upon disease occurrence? – Discuss the information flow based on maps – Use of PP to estimate • Decision probability regarding information disclosure • Weight of actors, motives in decision-making... PENAPH First Technical Workshop. 11-13 December 2012, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  15. Major lessons learnt • PE can be mobilized as a basis for other topics in animal health research involving a field approach • The training itself helped in building... – Communication – Common principles – Common tools • As such, the PE training should be recommended as a crucial step in any interdisciplinary field work around animal health PENAPH First Technical Workshop. 11-13 December 2012, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  16. SEA-PREID Participatory Research on Emerging Infectious Diseases in South East Asia Department of Livestock Development
Advertisement