Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to Improving quality assurance and communication in Tanzania(20)

Advertisement

More from ILRI(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

Improving quality assurance and communication in Tanzania

  1. Improving Quality Assurance and Communication in Tanzania” Deo Mlay Tanzania Dairy Board Oceanic Bay Hotel 23-25 September, 2015
  2. Background  The overall objective of the project was to address the quality and safety of milk marketed by informal traders in Morogoro and Tanga and improve communication among dairy stakeholders,  To transform informal milk traders to formal businesses through training and certification approach and  Improve communication among dairy stakeholders through Dairy Development Forum
  3. Achievement July 2013 - June, 2015 Milk Quality assurance component  Training of BDS providers  Training of Dairy Inspectors  Training of Milk Traders Communication among dairy stakeholders  Conducted 1st t0 5th Dairy Development Forum held from 2013 to date  Supported 10th National Dairy Development Conference
  4. Training using BDS  Approach to facilitate training to dairy stakeholders through market development approach where by the selected BDS providers that are already in business were oriented through an induction course to carry out training on commercial basis where by dairy stakeholders who wish to attend training have to pay fees.
  5.  The programme through a competitive approach selected fifteen (15) BDS providers who attended a induction course and intended to carried training of stakeholders in Morogoro and Tanga  This induction was guided by the Training of Trainers Module developed by ASARECA/PAAP and comprised of Lecture, group session and plenary discussion. In addition the induction also included the practical session which oriented the participants on the milk platform tests.
  6. Strengthening Regulation  TDB in collaborated with LGA put in place dairy inspection system to regulate hygienic milk handling and trading.  Dairy inspectors were appointed by the minister  TDB facilitated the training of twelve (14) dairy inspectors in the project area ( Mvomero, Kilosa, Lushoto and Handeni)
  7.  Training of Milk traders  Three training took place : 2 in Dakawa & 1 in Kilosa 69 Milk traders were trained Mode of payment The mode of payment was 70% check off system… paid by the milk collection owner
  8. Communication among dairy stakeholders Dairy Development Forum Dairy Development Forum In the first DDF meeting the dairy stakeholder identified key these systemic bottlenecks: i. Filling gaps in dairy technology and agribusiness skills ii. Strategies for expanding the national dairy herd iii. Business solutions for year round availability of quality feeds
  9. Formation of task forces I. Strategies for expanding the national dairy herd Six Task forces formed to advance their agenda on genetics 1.Heifer/bull/semen production 2.AI field delivery 3.Recording registration system 4. Farmer organizations 5. Dairy Genetics Policy/ régulations 6. Platform development and leadership
  10. II. Business solutions for year round availability of quality feeds Task forces  Policy and regulation  Technological issues and tools  Information and capacity building  Availability of pasture feeds
  11. 10th Nation Dairy Development Conference The NDDC Conducted in Musoma during the Milk Week on 30th May, 2014 Convened over 80 participants The theme was ‘Invest in Dairy for More Milk’
  12. What is working well, where How What is working well  Training of BDS providers  Training of Dairy Inspectors  Training Modules  Conduct of Dairy Development Forum Where  Training held in Morogoro and Tanga for BDS and Dairy Inspectors  DDF held five times ( Dar, during milk week) How  Use of Harmonised modules  TDB prepared training modules  DDF – functional structure and ILRI cover the cost of the meeting
  13. What could be improved Situation  Training of milk traders didn’t went smoothly as BDS providers are not aggressive to recruit the milk traders and on the other hand Inspectors are not functioning effective to reinforce the dairy industry act compliance as to articulate demand to training.  Double standard training conducted in the project. Most of the training cost are covered except the training of milk traders  the training has slow take off which has been contributed partly to unaffordable fees and also due inadequate sensitisation of stakeholders on the importance of training to improve profit in their dairy businesses.
  14. What to be improved  What to be done  To conduct promotional activities on training and certification scheme and to sensitise dairy stakeholders on its importance of training in improving quality and safety of milk  The project to develop a promotion and communication strategy for promoting the milk quality assurance scheme. The strategy to embrace design of branding materials, and organise quality award schemes.
  15. Contn. What to be improved  To device the cost sharing modalities to enable the stakeholders to meet the training cost and to enhance massive training of dairy stakeholders in the project areas,  Promote consumption of quality and safe milk  to collaborate with PMO RALG and LGA institutions in the implementation of the scheme  To promote regulatory and quality assurance guidelines and integrate training and certification into them  To establish milk traders inventory in the project areas and BDS to make use of it during recruitment
  16. Contn. What to be improved  The current project to facilitate formation of dairy stakeholder’s associations, DMH and SACCOS. Project will devise actions necessary to support formation of new associations and strengthening of the existing ones.
Advertisement