Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to An Integrative approach to sanitary and disease prevention for small scale poultry slaughterhouses in Thailand and Vietnam(20)

Advertisement

More from ILRI(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

An Integrative approach to sanitary and disease prevention for small scale poultry slaughterhouses in Thailand and Vietnam

  1. An Integrative Approach to Sanitary and Disease Prevention for Small Scale Poultry Slaughterhouse in Thailand and Vietnam Ecosystem Approaches to the Better Management of Zoonotic Emerging Infectious Diseases in the Southeast Asia Region (EcoZD) project EcoHealth Conference, Kunming China 2012 Suwit Chotinun, Suvichai Rojanastien, Terdsak Yano, Nguyen Viet Khong, PHAM THI Ngoc, Fred Unger, Hung Nguyen Viet, Dinh Xuan Tung
  2. Introduction
  3. The objectives of the study 1. To demonstrate the integrative approach for sustainable improvement of small scale poultry slaughterhouse in rural Northern Thailand and urban areas of Hanoi 2. To elucidate the hygienic status of small scale poultry slaughterhouses and their affect to ecological and health in the community 3. To sustainably enhance hygiene and functioning of the slaughterhouses.
  4. Study area Thailand Vietnam
  5. Materials and methods • Participatory action research was used in this study • Ecohealth perspective was also used as a core component • The study methodology was developed by the researchers and the target stakeholders at the beginning
  6. Conceptual framework SH improvement 1. Identify SH problems 2. Develop frame work and methodology 3. Collect baseline data Framework and method 4. Identify hygienic status and risk 5. Develop improvement guideline development 6. Disseminate results to the SH Step 1: Problem identification owners Step 2: Problem solving plan 7. Monitoring and evaluation Step 3: Action 8. Policy advocacy Step 4: Evaluation
  7. Participatory action research • Framework and methodology development  The government authorities (high level and the field level) and the slaughterhouse owners were invited to discuss the study at the beginning  The problems of the current situation were identified by the participants through the inception meeting and discussion  After the problems were identified, the framework and methodology were developed  Two-way communication with involved groups was used throughout in the study (give example)
  8. Problem identification • Identified problems 1. The slaughterhouses played role of the “hot spot” for food-borne disease spreading 2. The regulation of the standard SH will be strictly compulsive in 2012 3. The SH owners could not follow the law/regulation and some SHs had to stop operation
  9. Stakeholders identification Local Public health administration authorities officers DLD SH owners officers Poultry SH Consumer Environmental officers People in Meat vendors community
  10. Trans-disciplinary approach Environment Pollution Community’s Occupational force disease Educational 5.Social 1.Public health status Food Safety Hygienic Local 2.Veterinary Vet Practice administration service 4 La 4.Law DLD & g &regulation 3.Economic Living MPH expense Investment Income cost Profit t Debt
  11. Data collection tools development  The multiple tools were used to address the multi- dimension problems 1. Review document 2. Structured questionnaires 3. Observation and checklist 4. Interviews 5. Sample collection for sentinel bacteria: Salmonella spp and total bacteria count 6. Focus group discussion
  12. Data collection tools development
  13. Step 1: Problem identification  Baseline data collected to identify the situation and problems • Law and regulation: Existing and its implementation • SH management • Public health: Consumer’s knowledge, attitude, and practices of poultry meat consumption and food safety
  14. Step 1: Problem identification • Slaughterhouse management  Slaughtering process • Sentinels: Salmonella spp. and total bacteria count  Disease control and prevention • Biosecurity  Veterinary services  Environment  Waste management and affection to environment  KAP of food safety of the slaughterhouse owners
  15. Data analysis • Qualitative and quantitative analysis were used to analyzed the data • The results were back to the government officers and the slaughterhouses owners through the meeting and the discussion to get feedback from the main stakeholders
  16. Data analysis  “Indicators” for hygienic practices • Score from questionnaires, observation and checklist • Sentinel bacteria : Salmonella spp.
  17. Guideline development • The simple blueprint for the small scale poultry slaughterhouse was developed • The standard of operation was established • Those guideline was back to the slaughterhouses owners again  Practical and suitable for small scale
  18. Monitoring and evaluation • Outcome mapping was used as a tool for monitoring change of behavior and adaptation – Five Slaughterhouses were selected for evaluate the success of the guideline development and knowledge transfer – Those slaughterhouses were regularly visited to follow the progression • The meeting with associated government authorities will be held to advocate the results to the policy level
  19. Results 1. The participatory action research 2. The hygienic status • Factors affecting to hygienic status 3. Intervention strategies
  20. Law and regulation
  21. Slaughtering process and hygienic practices
  22. Slaughter Scald Soak in water Defeather Soak in water Defeather
  23. Scald Storage
  24. Bacteriological results-Salmonella spp.
  25. Bacteriological data-Overall Salmonella spp.
  26. Hygienic management on SH Class Percentage Good 0% (0/46) Fair 6.5% (3/46) Poor 93.5% (43/46)
  27. • VN team result
  28. Environmental management
  29. waste water management Waste water management Frequency Percent Treatment pool 5 10.9 Waste water collecting pool 8 17.4 Other 6 13.0 None 27 58.7 Total 46 100.0
  30. • VN team result
  31. Veterinary services
  32. Results- Live chicken inspection Live chicken inspection Frequency Percent Yes (paravet) 1 2.2 No 45 97.8 Total 46 100.0
  33. Results- Meat inspection Live chicken inspection Frequency Percent Yes 0 0.0 No 46 100.0 Total 46 100.0
  34. Law and regulation • Food safety is the Government’s policy • SH regulation is very high standards and it is suitable for large scale • Researches are needed to solve the problem  community SH
  35. Law and regulation • All SHs must address Standard certification within 2012 • Current regulation is impracticable for small scale SHs • All small SH can not achieve standard regulation
  36. Law and regulation • Almost all of the owners cannot improve SH follow the DLD regulation • The main problem include – Not enough budget (70%) – Impractical criteria of STD SH (90%) • 70% of owner indicated that they had to stop running business if officers strictly perform of regulation
  37. • VN team result
  38. The SH improvement • Before this project was operated, the owners did not know how to improve the slaughterhouse • The owners accepted the guideline and implement follow the recommendation developed from this study • At present, the owners were still improving their slaughterhouses
  39. Discussion  Factors affecting to the hygienic management • The knowledge and perception of the owner’s regarding the food safety was low  the unhygienic practices were common observed • Law income from slaughterhouses  lack of budget for investment • The competition with modern trades was high especially in urban area
  40. Discussion • This study could demonstrated that the PAR and Ecohealth approach was effective tool for solving complex and multi- dimension problems • Traditional approach is still done “for” rather than done “with” (Dakubo, 2004) • This study demonstrated high impact on policy
  41. Conclusion • Thailand and Vietnam
  42. The challenge • Need to discuss with Fred
  43. EcoZD Project For more information about the EcoZD project, please visit: www.ilri.org/ecozd www.ilriasia.wordpress.com/tag/ecozd
Advertisement