Advertisement
Evaluating a group based intervention for improving meat safety in a Nigerian wet market
Upcoming SlideShare
Capacity development of public sector staff: LIVES approach in graduate train...Capacity development of public sector staff: LIVES approach in graduate train...
Loading in ... 3
1 of 1
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to Evaluating a group based intervention for improving meat safety in a Nigerian wet market(20)

More from ILRI(20)

Advertisement

Evaluating a group based intervention for improving meat safety in a Nigerian wet market

  1. Evaluating a group based intervention for improving meat safety in a Nigerian wet-market D. Gracea, M. Dipeolub and J. Olawoyec aInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya; bUniversity of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria; cUniversity of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria August 2012 Background Developing countries have rules and regulations for assuring food safety; yet food-borne disease remains a major cause of sickness and death. We evaluated a group-based and gender-sensitive intervention to improve food safety among meat processors and retailers (butchers) in Bodija Market, Ibadan. Methods An interactive training workshop was held for Butchers Associations’ representatives who were selected to pass on In Ibadan, meat is produced, information and training to their group. processed and sold under un- hygienic conditions: 98% of Meat hygiene knowledge, attitude and practice was assessed meat samples failed to meat before attending the workshop and afterwards (n=63). It was international microbiological also assessed for those who did not attend the workshop standards. (n=68) but were intended recipients of training through their Association. The group-based intervention Microbiological quality of meat was assessed before and after comprised: the workshop (n=400 samples). • Stakeholder engagement • Identifying critical points for reducing risk Results • Targeting interventions at Butchers are self-organised into groups. WomenPicturesa more have critical points important role in self-organised groups than officially-organised • Providing new technologies such as disinfectants groups. • Training by experts • Followed by peer-to-peer Women have significantly (p=0.03) better meat handling training practices than men; groups with more women have significantly • Followed by hand-holding better quality meat (p=0.001). and support • Branding to identify butchers Male butchers eat more muscle meat (steak) and women more trained in hygienic practices. offal (intestines etc.) (p=0.004). Risk assessment identified the critical control points for managing food safety risk. Group-based interventions were successful at delivering Conclusion information and innovation for meat safety. Gender is an important determinant of food safety in Impact evaluation showed: the informal and traditional meat markets of Ibadan, Nigeria. • improvement in knowledge, attitude and practice • a 20% reduction in unacceptable meat samples (p<0.001) Food safety management based on collective action and • training butchers cost $9 per butcher and reduced cases of capacity strengthening was effective technically and had diarrhoea among their customers by 10% or 1,600 episodes a high benefit cost. This approach could be more widely resulting in $780 saved in treatment costs. used in initiatives aimed at improving food safety. For further information see: Grace et al., 2012, Trop Anim Health Prod DOI 10.1007/s11250-012-0207-0 Grace et al., 2012, Trop Anim Health Prod DOI 10.1007/s11250-012-0208-0 This document is licensed for use under a Creative Commons Attribution –Non commercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License Jun 2012
Advertisement