India Value Chain Development Planning
More milk, meat and fish by and for the poor
Livestock and Fish CGIAR Research Program
Manesar, India
2-3 May 2012
Tom Randolph

Meeting Objectives
 Develop common understanding of objective and
approach
begin to define a country strategy
 Review and refine the implementation plan, including
individual roles and responsibilities, and agree on the
timetable for 2012
 Set of deliverables by Center, with level of effort
 Identify resource mobilization priorities and agree on
responsibilities
 Defined as deliverables

More milk, meat, and fish
by and for the poor
Overview

Reminder: Goal
More milk, meat and fish by and for the poor
To sustainably increase the productivity of
small-scale livestock and fish systems to
increase the availability and affordability of
animal-source foods for poor consumers and,
in doing so, reduce poverty through greater
participation by the poor along the whole value
chains for animal-source foods.

Basic Idea: Solution-driven R4D to achieve impact
Traditional approach was piecemeal
Past research has focused specific aspects
of given value chains, commodities and country.
Inputs & Services Production Processing Marketing Consumers
...in Country A
Inputs & Services Production Processing Marketing Consumers
...in Country B
Inputs & Services Production Processing Marketing Consumers
...in Country C
Inputs & Services Production Processing Marketing Consumers
...in Country D

Approach: Solution-driven R4D to achieve impact
Addressing the whole value chain
R4D integrated to transform selected value chains
In targeted commodities and countries.
Consumers
Major intervention with development partners
Value chain development team + research partners
Strategic CRP 3.7 Cross-cutting Platforms
• Technology Generation
• Market Innovation
• Targeting & Impact
INTERVENTIONS TO GLOBAL RESEARCH
SCALE OUT REGIONALLY PUBLIC GOODS

Working toward interventions
for impact at scale
CRP3.7 Prepare intervention Performance Target:
double production in
x poor households Scaling out
Development Partners
$90m
Knowledge Partners $10m
CRP3.7 Strategic Research $10m
Time 10 years

FOCUS: 9 Target Value Chains
SHEEP & GOATS
AQUACULTURE
PIGS
DAIRY

Delivering CRP3.7 Livestock + Fish
Structure: Six integrated Components
5 Targeting: Foresight, prioritization,
Technology 4 Value chain development
development:
1 Health
Consumers
2 Genetics
3 Feeds Commodity X in Country Y
6Cross-cutting: gender, impact, M&E, comms, capacity building

3-year Budget Envelope by Center
$7,113
$3,183
$25,195 CIAT
ICARDA
ILRI
$64,091 World Fish
TOTAL = US$99.6 million

3-year Budget Envelope by Component
Program
Management
$5.6m
Institutional
Overhead
$16.3m
Targeting,
Gender
and Impact Technology
$13.3m Development
$43.3m
Value Chain
Development
$20.9m
TOTAL = US$99.6 million

A generic livestock value chain
N Taylor
12

A value chain is the set of
A generic livestock value chain
actors, transactions, information flows, and
N Taylor
institutions that enable value to be delivered to the
customer (Baker 2007)
13

The Value Chain Development Component:
Working toward interventions
for impact at scale
Engagement
Assessment
Piloting
Validating
Learning at scale
Tackling the harder constraints
Time 10 years

Engagement / Assessment
Engagement
• Scoping R&D partners
• Stakeholder event
• Catalyze alliance
Assessment
• Reviews
Assessment
• Tool development
Reviews
• Site selection
• Tool development
• Rapid VC assessment
• Situational analysis
• Framework for assessing VC performance
• Identify best-bet intervention
• Identify • In-depth VC assessment
best-bet intervention
• In-depth VC assessment
Time 1st year 2nd year 3rd year

Piloting / Validating
Piloting
• Baseline studies
• Action-research trials
Validating
• Field trials
Time 1st year 2nd year 3rd year

Update on the LaF CRP
 Preliminary planning meeting held Sept 2011
 Officially started January 1st 2012
 Planning still ongoing
 Strategy logframe
 Assigning resources
 How many activities can be supported?
 Unrestricted portion fully funded (CG Fund)
 Large gap in restricted funded portion  will
require major resource mobilization effort

More meat, milk and fish
by and for the poor
The Planning Process

The Planning Horizon
1 Objective 1 Outcome
Output 1
Output 2
Output 3
1
3 4 Output 4
2
Time
3rd year 6-10 years

The Planning Challenge
Restricted + CG Fund = Work Plan &
Projects Budget
1 2 Subsidy ??
Staff time XX X X XX
Budget
Other costs XX X X X
Deliverables XX X X Work plan
Outputs Other LaF
(Milestones) CRP

The Planning Challenge
Restricted + CG Fund = Work Plan &
#1 Starting
Projects Budget
point
1 2 Subsidy ??
Staff time XX X X XX
Budget
Other costs XX X X X
Deliverables XX X X Work plan
Outputs Other LaF
(Milestones) CRP

The Planning Challenge
Restricted + CG Fund = Work Plan &
#1 Starting
Projects Budget
point
1 2 Subsidy ??
Staff time XX X X XX
Budget
Other costs XX X X X
Deliverables XX X X Work plan
#2 Still to
negotiate
Outputs Other LaF
(Milestones) CRP

A Strategy for
Value Chain Development
More milk, meat and fish by and for the poor
Livestock and Fish CGIAR Research Program

Working toward interventions
for impact at scale
CRP3.7 Prepare intervention Performance Target:
double production in
x poor households Scaling out
Development Partners
$90m
Knowledge Partners $10m
CRP3.7 Strategic Research $10m
Time 10 years

Engagement / Assessment
Engagement Output 1: Methods for
• Scoping R&D partners
identifying pro-poor
• Stakeholder event
upgrading opportunities in
• Catalyze alliance
animal-source food value
Assessment chains
• Reviews
• Tool development
• Site selection
• Rapid VC assessment
• Situational analysis
• Framework for assessing VC performance
• Identify best-bet intervention
• In-depth VC assessment
Time 1st year 2nd year 3rd year

Engagement / Assessment
Engagement
• Scoping R&D partners Output 2: R&D innovation
• Stakeholder event alliances created to promote
• Catalyze alliance target pro-poor value chains
Assessment
• Reviews
• Tool development
• Site selection
• Rapid VC assessment
• Situational analysis
• Framework for assessing VC performance
• Identify best-bet intervention
• In-depth VC assessment
Time 1st year 2nd year 3rd year

Engagement / Assessment
Engagement Output 3: Pro-poor, gender-
• Scoping R&D partners
sensitive technological and
• Stakeholder event
institutional options devised
• Catalyze alliance
and validated for each target
Assessment value chain
• Reviews
• Tool development
• Site selection
• Rapid VC assessment
• Situational analysis
• Framework for assessing VC performance
• Identify best-bet intervention
• In-depth VC assessment
Time 1st year 2nd year 3rd year

Piloting / Validating
Piloting
• Baseline studies
• Action-research trials
Output 4: Integrated pro-
poor, gender-sensitive
intervention strategies
formulated and piloted in Validating
each target value chain • Field trials
Time 1st year 2nd year 3rd year

Working toward interventions
for impact at scale
Begins
happening in
Years 3-5
Engagement
Assessment
Piloting
Validating
Learning at scale
Tackling the harder constraints
Time 10 years

Key Milestones
2012 2013
• R&D stakeholders identified • Partners trained in Rapid VCA
and consulted (event held) • Results of Rapid VCAs shared
• Initial toolkit (including with stakeholders
reviews) • In-depth VCAs funded and
• Framework for VC performance conducted
• Site selection criteria decided • Testing of best-bet intervention
and sites selected v1 funded and initiated
• Rapid VCAs funded and
conducted
• Review of successes/failures What’s missing?
• Best-bet intervention v1
described