Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to The state of knowledge and policy efforts to improve inventory estimates and mitigate livestock GHG emissions in Africa(20)

More from ILRI(20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded(20)

The state of knowledge and policy efforts to improve inventory estimates and mitigate livestock GHG emissions in Africa

  1. The State of Knowledge and Policy Efforts to Improve Inventory Estimates and Mitigate Livestock GHG Emissions in Africa Claudia Arndt, PhD Senior Scientist & Team Lead of the Mazingira Centre https://mazingira.ilri.org/ Pre-conference workshop on Reducing Enteric CH4 Emissions from Sub-Saharan Africa at GGAA 2022 on 4 June at 8th International Greenhouse Gas and Animal Agriculture Conference, Orlando, Florida, USA, 5-9 June 2022
  2. Share of Global Food System GHG Emissions 39% 17% 17% 10% 7% 7% 1% Asia Africa Latin America North America Europe Russia Oceania Asia, Africa, and Latin America contribute 72% of Food System GHG emissions
  3. National GHG Emissions Associated with Food systems Source: Crippa et al., 2021. For most African countries >50% of the national GHG emissions are associated to the Food System 33 million smallholder contribute ~70% of food supply in Africa
  4. GHG Emissions From Livestock Value Chain in Africa Africa Source: Gleam, 2020 Global
  5. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 1990 2010 2030 2050 2070 RED MEAT & MILK PROTEIN (MT/YEAR) POPULATION (BILLION) YEAR EUROPE +6.2% Projected Population & Demand Growth 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 1990 2010 2030 2050 2070 RED MEAT & MILK PROTEIN (MT/YEAR) POPULATION (BILLION) YEAR AFRICA +3.9% +3.6% +56% +135% +84% +207% MT: Million metric tons Source: Modified after Henchion et al., 2021 and FAO. Red meat & milk protein (g/capita/d) 2010 2030 2050 7.2 8.5 9.4 Red meat & milk protein (g/capita/d) 2010 2030 2050 28.6 30.3 30.4 +6.3%
  6. National GHG Inventories • A national GHG inventory is required under the UNFCCC • Countries have to submit a national GHG inventory starting in 2024 • This is part of the Enhanced Transparency Framework to show that countries are taking action to meet their NDCs under the Paris Agreement UNFCCC: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change NDCs: Nationally Determined Contributions
  7. Countries that Include Livestock in New & Updated NDCs Source: Modified Rose et al., 2021 & https://ccafs.cgiar.org/index.php/resources/tools/agriculture-in-the-ndcs- data-maps-2021 Out of 54 African countries: • 16 countries include Mitigation & Adaptation measures • 5 countries include livestock Mitigation measures • 14 countries include Adaptation measures • 9 countries include no livestock measures • 10 countries include no new or updated NDCs Adaptation addresses the impacts of climate change Mitigation addresses the causes of climate change Both approaches are needed in developing countries!
  8. Mitigation & Adaptation Strategies in NDCs of African Countries Source: Rose et al., 2021 and https://ccafs.cgiar.org/index.php/resources/tools/agriculture-in-the-ndcs-data- maps-2021 -4% -7% -7% -7% -15% -20% -30% -20% -10% 0% % of African Countries Mitigation 19% 13% 9% 17% 6% 17% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% % of African Countries Adaptation Feed mgmt Manure mgmt Breed mgmt Herd comp mgmt Silvopastoralism Animal health
  9. National GHG Inventories – Approaches Effects of Interventions CANNOT be quantified Tier 1 Tier 2 Effects of Interventions CAN be quantified Source: Modified GRA (n.d.) Livestock development and climate change GHG GHG Number of animals Number of animals
  10. Capacities to Track Changes in GHG Emissions Do Not Match NDC Ambitions Tier 2 for at least some livestock Countries developing Tier 2 for livestock Countries with Tier 2 Inventory for livestock Countries with livestock mitigation in their new or updated NDCs Source: Wilkes; personal communication. Source: Rose et al., 2021 and https://ccafs.cgiar.org/index.php/resources/to ols/agriculture-in-the-ndcs-data-maps-2021
  11. GHG Emission Estimates From Livestock in sub-Saharan Africa – A Stock Take All © Sonja Leitner Source: Graham et al. submitted Poster #93 Graham et al.
  12. Estimates for Enteric CH4 Emissions From sub-Saharan Africa Measurement Number of studies % of total studies Cattle 14 70% Direct 6 30% Indirect 8 40% Small Ruminants 6 30% Direct 2 10% Indirect 4 20% Total 20 • Few studies on direct and indirect measurement • Very little data on small ruminants
  13. Enteric CH4 EFs for High Productive Cattle Systems Compared To IPCC Defaults Dairy Mat. females Mat. males Calves Growing Emission factor (kg CH 4 animal -1 year -1 ) n = number of observations for each species n = 8 n = 5 n = 1 n = 5 n = 9
  14. Enteric CH4 EFs for Low Productive Cattle Systems Compared To IPCC Defaults Mat. females Females grazing Calves Draft bulls Bulls grazing Growing Emission factor (kg CH 4 animal -1 year -1 ) n = number of observations for each species n = 6 n = 18 n = 3 n = 3 n = 4 n = 7
  15. Enteric CH4 EFs for Small Ruminants Compared to IPCC Defaults n = 8 n = 10 Emission factor (kg CH 4 animal -1 year -1 ) n = number of observations for each species 2006 & 2019 Sheep Goat
  16. Estimates for Manure GHG Emissions From sub-Saharan Africa • Few studies on direct measurements • No indirect estimation • No data on small ruminants Measurement Number of studies % of total studies Cattle direct 6 100% Dung 1 17% Urine 0 0% Dung + Urine 5 83% Small Ruminants 0 0% Total 6
  17. CH4 EFs for Manure Emissions Compared to IPCC Default Solid storage Manure deposited (pasture, range and paddock) Dry Lot n = 8 n = 6 n = 1 Emission factor (kg CH 4 animal -1 year -1 ) Emission factor (kg CH 4 kg VS -1 ) Emission factor (kg CH 4 kg VS -1 ) n = number of observations for each manure category and GHG used for mean ± 95% CI calculation
  18. N2O EFs for Manure Emissions Compared to IPCC Default n = number of observations for each manure category and GHG used for mean ± 95% CI calculation Deposited Manure (pasture, range and paddock) Applied manure (manure applied as organic fertilizer) n = 12 n = 14 n = 0 n = 0 n = 52 n = 24
  19. N2O EFs for Manure Emissions Compared to IPCC Default n = number of observations for each manure category and GHG used for mean ± 95% CI calculation Solid storage Dry Lot n = 6 n = 2
  20. Mitigation Challenge – Global Enteric CH4 Emissions • Livestock enteric fermentation contributes • 17% of global Food Systems GHG emissions • 27% of anthropogenic CH4 emissions • Global demand for red meat and milk is increasing • CH4 is a short-lived climate pollutant (12-year lifetime) Mitigation strategies for enteric CH4 emissions are needed Fig source: Global Methane Initiative (GMI).
  21. Study Objectives • Meta-analysis to determine mitigation strategies for enteric CH4 emissions that do not compromise animal performance or have other unacceptable tradeoffs • Estimated the potential of identified mitigation strategies to contribute to the 1.5°C target by 2030 and 2050
  22. Findings From the Meta-Analysis
  23. Globally We Can Help Meet the 1.5 ° C Target by 2030 but Not 2050
  24. High-Income Countries CAN Meet The 1.5 °C Target by 2030 & 2050
  25. Low- & Middle-Income Countries UNLIKELY to Meet the 1.5 ° C Target by 2030 or 2050
  26. Takeaways The State of Knowledge and Policy Efforts to Improve Inventory GHG Estimates • Low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) contribute >70% of Food System emissions • Capacities to track changes in GHG emissions do not match NDC ambitions • Mitigation & Adaptation Strategies are needed for LMIC • Research progress on GHG emissions from livestock fall short of the ambitions for better inventories
  27. Takeaways The State of Knowledge to Improve Mitigate GHG Emissions • There are effective strategies to reduce GHG emissions, but only few are applicable to Africa • Even with a 100% adoption of technical possible mitigation strategies, Africa is unlikely to meet the 1.5°C target while high- income countries could Rapid action is needed in LMIC in the livestock sector to help limit global warming to 1.5°C.
  28. Thank you very much for your attention! Claudia Arndt, PhD claudia.arndt@cgiar.org Better lives through livestock https://mazingira.ilri.org/
Advertisement