Advertisement
Genetic diversity of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumacher) germplasm based on amplified fragment length polymorphism
Upcoming SlideShare
Napier grass: a fast growing grass used for cut and carry feed for cross bred...Napier grass: a fast growing grass used for cut and carry feed for cross bred...
Loading in ... 3
1 of 1
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Advertisement

Similar to Genetic diversity of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumacher) germplasm based on amplified fragment length polymorphism(20)

More from ILRI(20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded(20)

Genetic diversity of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumacher) germplasm based on amplified fragment length polymorphism

  1. GENETIC DIVERSITY OF NAPIER GRASS (Pennisetum purpureum Schumacher) GERMPLASM BASED ON AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM Bramwel W Wanjala1, 3, 5, A Muchugi2, M Mulaa1, M Obonyo3, J Harvey5, R Skilton5, J Proud4 and J Hanson4* Kenya Agricultural Research Institute1, International Centre for Agroforestry Research2, Egerton University3, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)- Ethiopia4, Biosciences eastern and central Africa (BecA) Hub, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya5 Napier grass- an important tropical fodder Outputs An important forage crop for dairy production systems, Napier grass is among the Develop molecular markers to efficiently highest yielding tropical grasses. Therefore, it is a promising crop for fodder in the identify traits in the available gene pools of region. However, production faces major challenges Napier grass. Improve the efficiency, from biotic and abiotic stresses. Available effectiveness, speed and precision of plant germplasm is currently wanting for resistance to breeding for abiotic stress tolerance, pest and major pests and other biotic stresses currently disease resistance, better agronomic traits, and afflicting N i grass. Th f ffli i Napier Therefore, germplasm l improved fodder quality. i d f dd lit characterization is an urgent need for improvement efforts. Results Polymorphic AFLP markers identified Genetic distance and Fst Introduction The variance within populations accounted for 91% while among population Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.) is an important forage crop for dairy variance contributed only 9% production system in the tropics, including East Africa. Cluster analysis (see below) The grass produces more dry matter per unit time when compared with other grasses or legumes. However, Napier production faces major challenges from biotic & abiotic stresses and limited access to external inputs like pesticides, fertilizers, and irrigation. Available germplasm may lack genes for major disease and pest resistance and abiotic stress tolerance. Conclusions The 216 polymorphic AFLP markers assessed genetic variation among the 281 Th l hi k d i i i h Few attempts have been made to understand genetic variability of Napier grass based genotypes from the region. on analyses of genomic DNA. Evaluation based on AFLP markers would be suitable for providing such The diversity data can be used to compliment other data (Phenotypic, information due to the high level of polymorphism of this technique. AFLP has Nutritional and Biochemical) and thus offer more reliable pedigree information advantages over traditional fingerprinting protocols such as RFLP (lower resolution) and RAPD (lower reproducibility). Recommendations The objectives of this study were to: identify of polymorphic AFLP markers; conduct Existing genetic variation in Napier grass germplasm from the region should AFLP-based genotyping of Napier grass accessions in East Africa and ILRI-Forage be utilized and additional variability identified. germplasm to better inform ongoing breeding efforts. Introduction of new genetic variability from related or unrelated species through biotechnology should be used to make better hybrids for disease resistance, improved nutritional quality and increased biomass. Project workflow Kenya DNA extraction and normalization Acknowledgments We thank, partners from Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania for providing materials Tanzania AFLP analysis for genotyping. BecA Hub KARI Director and other staff. Uganda ABI3730 xl Genetic Analyzer Staff and graduate students at the BecA Hub. Funding for this project was for provided by Association of Strengthening Data Analysis ILRI Forage Germplasm Agricultural Research in East and Central Africa (ASARECA).
Advertisement