Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to Food safety solutions(20)

Advertisement

More from ILRI(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

Food safety solutions

  1. Food safety solutions Delia Grace, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) 2019 Third Global ODA Forum for Sustainable Agricultural Development – Inclusive Growth and Global Partnerships Seoul, Korea 13-15 May 2019
  2. CIMMYT Mexico City Mexico IFPRI Wash. DC USA CIP Lima Peru CIAT Cali Colombia Bioversity International Rome Italy AfricaRice Cotonou Benin IITA Ibadan Nigeria ILRI Nairobi Kenya Addis Ababa, Ethiopia World Agroforestry Nairobi Kenya ICARDA Beirut Lebanon ICRISAT Patancheru India IWMI Colombo Sri Lanka IRRI Los Banos Phillippines WorldFish Penang Malaysia CIFOR Bogor Indonesia CGIAR research centres
  3.         Livestock and the SDGs 
  4. • Food & nutrition security • Poverty eradication • Environment & human health Policies, institutions and livelihoods Sustainable livestock systems Feed and forage resources development Livestock genetics Animal & human health Impact at scale BecA-ILRI hub ILRI programs
  5. Urban zoonoses • Emergence of pathogens in Nairobi • Mosquito-borne disease in Guwahati and Ha Noi • Epidemiology, economics and social science • Whole genome sequencing and phlyo- geography
  6. Land use change and zoonotic diseases DDDAC Research team
  7. Surveillance, response, traceability Brucellosis Leptospirosis Trypanosomiasis Echinococcosis Rift Valley Fever T. solium/T. saginata cysticercosis Fascioliasis Anthrax Q fever TB Salmonella spp. including AST E. coli including AST Campylobacter spp. including AST Staphylococcus spp. including AST
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. Foodborne disease matters for development  Developing country consumers show high concern over FBD  The huge health burden of FBD is borne mainly by developing countries  FBD has high economic costs: health, agriculture & economy-wide  FBD limits access of poor farmers to export markets and threatens access to domestic markets  FBD discriminates: the YOMPI are most at risk
  11. Causes of FBD
  12. Foods implicated in FBD Painter et al., 2013, Sudershan et al., 2014, Mangan et al., 2014; Tam et al., 2014; Sang et al., 2014 ; ILRI, 2016
  13. Regulations are needed but not enough  100% of milk in Assam doesn’t meet standards  98% of beef in Ibadan, 52% pork in Ha Noi, unacceptable bacteria counts  92% of Addis milk and 46% of Nairobi milk had aflatoxins over EU standards  36% of farmed fish from Kafrelsheikh exceed one or more MPL  30% of chicken from commercial broilers in Pretoria unacceptable for S. aureus  24% of boiled milk in Abidjan unacceptable S. aureus
  14. Capacity building won’t work without incentives  Many actors are well intentioned but ill informed  Small scale pilots show short term improvements  But GAP and one-off training has limited effect – In 4 years VietGAP reached 0.06% – In Nigeria, food safety was in a wet market was worse 9 years later – In Thailand GAP farmers have no better pesticide use than non-GAP
  15. Pull approach (demand for safe food) Push approach (supply of safe food) ENABLING ENVIRONM ENT Consumers recognize & demand safer food VC actors respond to demand & incentives Inform, monitor & legitimize VC actors Build capacity & motivation of regulators Consumer campaign for empowered consumers Three legged stool
  16. Technological interventions coupled with training of value chain actors savings on firewood / month = 900,000 UGX (260 US$) + >100 trees Reach: 50% of all pork butchers and their 300,000 customers in Kampala
  17. • Branding & certification of milk vendors in Kenya & Guwahti, Assam led to improved milk safety. • It benefited the national economy by $33 million per year in Kenyan and $6 million in Assam • 70% of traders in Assam and 24% in Kenya are currently registered • 6 milllion consumers in Kenya and 1.5 million in Assam are benefiting from safer milk Towards impact at scale
  18. Take home messages  FBD is important for health and development  Huge health burden: most is due to microbes & worms in fresh foods sold in wet markets  Currently no proven approaches for mass markets in LMIC that are scalable and sustainable  Training and regulation approaches don’t work but solutions based on working with the informal sector more promising
  19. This presentation is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. better lives through livestock ilri.org ILRI thanks all donors and organizations who globally supported its work through their contributions to the CGIAR Trust Fund.

Editor's Notes

  1. Two-thirds of human pathogens are zoonotic – many of these transmitted via animal source food (salmonellosis, EHEC, cryptosporidium) Animal source food single most important cause of food-borne disease Many food-borne diseases cause few symptoms in animal host (chicken and S. enteritidis, calf and E. coli O157:H7, oysters and V. vulnificus) Many zoonotic diseases controlled most effectively in animal host/reservoir Recent studies shown pre- ‘harvest’ stage most important for controlling food-borne pathogens
  2. s/h participation in markets Risk rather than regulatory
Advertisement