Advertisement
Check these out next
Food safety: Why the game has changed
Mar. 23, 2018•0 likes•252 views
2 likes
Be the first to like this
Show More
views
Total views
0
On Slideshare
0
From embeds
0
Number of embeds
0
Download to read offline
Report
Science
Presented by Delia Grace at a 'Growing with Dairy' Stakeholder Dissemination Meeting, Nairobi, Kenya, 9 March 2018.
ILRIFollow
-- at ILRIAdvertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Recommended
Opportunites for linking agriculture and nutrition - Marie RuelInternational Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
Ific 2014 food tech survey final exec summaryFood Insight
Sandy Thomas presents the food safety policy briefGlo_PAN
Feed and forage development and scaling in the Ethiopian highlands africa-rising
Youth in AR4D a case study of the PAEPARD projectFrancois Stepman
Cereal-legume value chain stakeholders in WCA meet to develop demand-driven a...ICRISAT
Food safety: Why the game has changed
- Food safety: why the game has changed Delia Grace, Program Leader, International Livestock Research Institute L-R: N.Palmer/CIAT, S.Mann/ILRI, A.Sanabria/Photoshare
- Causes of Food Borne Disease World Health Organisation, 2016 (worms)
- Foods implicated in FBD World Health Organisation, 2017
- Livestock, blue and produce revolution Increase in per capita consumption of perishables and pulses in developing countries with 1963 as index year (FAO, 2009) %
- Growing concern about food safety • Many/most reported concern over food safety (40-97%) • Willing to pay 5-10% premium for food safety • Buy 20-40% less during animal health scares • Younger, wealthier, town- residing, supermarket-shoppers willing to pay more for safety Jabbar et al., 2010
- FBD trends
- Dairy value chain in Assam Concerns about milk quality in Assam Training to promote knowledge and hygiene amongst producers and traders 7 2009 2012 2009-2011
- Capacity-building, awareness, incentives Training on hygienic milk production and handling Along the dairy value chain: producer, trader Media and information campaigns Peer to peer monitoring & evaluation Incentive: good publicity & membership dairy platform 8
- • Better knowledge & practices. • Less mastitis • Higher revenues • Greater consumeer trust in milk • 70% of traders in Assam are currently registered • It benefited the economy by $6 million a year in Assam • 1.5 million consumers benefiting from safer milk
- 10
- 11
- 12 Results 1. Better knowledge – Intervention improvement 30 points, 95% CI: 4.96-7.95 – Control improvement 8 points, 95% CI: 0.11-3.08 2. Better practice – Intervention 16 ml 95% CI: 15.1-16.3 – Control 12 ml 95% CI: 11.5-12.1 3. Better clinical outcomes – Fewer side-effects 4. Less pressure for drug resistance - Less under dosage
- EFICaCE Effective: interventions that work, rigorously evaluated Frugal: affordable, scalable, escape the project Incentives: motivation for behaviour change Capacity building: improvement in knowledge, skills Change (innovation): new technologies, approaches Enabling Environment: support from leaders & authorities
- a4nh.cgiar.org M.Hasan,c/oPhotoshare
Editor's Notes
- OPT 1
- Two-thirds of human pathogens are zoonotic – many of these transmitted via animal source food (salmonellosis, EHEC, cryptosporidium) Animal source food single most important cause of food-borne disease Many food-borne diseases cause few symptoms in animal host (chicken and S. enteritidis, calf and E. coli O157:H7, oysters and V. vulnificus) Many zoonotic diseases controlled most effectively in animal host/reservoir Recent studies shown pre- ‘harvest’ stage most important for controlling food-borne pathogens
- Two-thirds of human pathogens are zoonotic – many of these transmitted via animal source food (salmonellosis, EHEC, cryptosporidium) Animal source food single most important cause of food-borne disease Many food-borne diseases cause few symptoms in animal host (chicken and S. enteritidis, calf and E. coli O157:H7, oysters and V. vulnificus) Many zoonotic diseases controlled most effectively in animal host/reservoir Recent studies shown pre- ‘harvest’ stage most important for controlling food-borne pathogens
- s/h participation in markets Risk rather than regulatory
- We spent a lot of time developing the message. Participatory and KAP were used to establish what farmers knew, didn’t know and needed to know. A lot of time was spent on developing the medium. We used preference and panel tests to find out which farmers preferred and understood. The information pamphlet went through 5 revisions. And then we tested it
- OPT 1
Advertisement