Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to The Nile Basin Development Challenge: A component of the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food(20)

Advertisement

More from ILRI(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

The Nile Basin Development Challenge: A component of the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food

  1. The Nile Basin Development Challenge: a component of the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food Alan Duncan ILRI Ethiopia projects meeting Addis Ababa, 11 March 2013
  2. • CPWF aims to increase water productivity and resilience of social and ecological systems • Through its broad partnerships, it conducts research that leads to local impact and wider change
  3. Phase 2, start 2009
  4. Basin Development Challenges (BDCs) • Nile – rainwater management in landscapes • Andes – Benefit sharing mechanisms • Ganges – intensification in coastal areas • Limpopo – rainwater management and water access • Mekong – dams, reservoirs and livelihoods • Volta – rainwater management and small reservoirs
  5. Programme Structure Learning about Integrating technologies, policies rainwater and institutions. management This project will develop integrated rainwater management strategies - to slow down land systems. degradation and reduce downstream siltation. This project reviews past and ongoing activities, compiles an Targeting and scaling out of inventory of actors, and identifies best practices rainwater management systems. for dissemination and This project will better target or ‘match’ use. promising technologies with particular Catalyzing environments, thus overcoming the limited platforms for success and impact of many past agricultural development efforts. learning, communication Assessing and anticipating the and coordination. This project provides a consequences of innovation in multi-stakeholder rainwater management systems. platform for all the This project will quantify the consequences of projects in support of improved rainwater management, measuring improved downstream, cross-scale consequences of communication, successful innovation in the Ethiopian innovation and adaptive highlands. management.
  6. Nile BDC scales and sites Basin National Local
  7. ILRI inputs into NBDC • Work on livestock water productivity • Diagnosis of current status of local planning and implementation around NRM • Piloting approaches to bottom up NRM: innovation platforms, participatory planning tools (Wat-a-game etc) • Suitability mapping
  8. Livestock water productivity Simplified framework for assessing livestock-water productivity can help identify options to reduce water 8 depletion associated with animal keeping and increase goods and …. (Peden et al., 2007).
  9. Calculating livestock water productivity More milk per cow means less water use per litre of milk
  10. Assessment of current NRM planning approaches Diagnosis of current status of local planning and implementation around NRM
  11. Preliminary findings: RWM planning & implementation  RWM planning is based on a top-down quota system... with some perverse incentives affecting woreda officials and DAs  Woreda offices have an incentive to increase woreda targets to win resources, leading to pressure on implementaters at kebele level  DAs’ performance assessment is based on how far targets are met --> limited opportunity / incentive to innovate or listen to farmers.  Farmers report that they have very little say in where and how RWM is implemented, and some feel that government imposes on them.
  12. Innovation platforms Joint identification of common NRM issue to ensure collective action
  13. Conventional approach to agricultural research for development (especially in Ethiopia) Technologies
  14. Why Innovation Platforms? Or...
  15. Experimenting with local participatory planning tools A lot of talk about ‘participation’ but little knowledge about how to put it into action. WAT-A-GAME- Participatory planning for NRM (www.watagame.info)
  16. Nile Goblet Tool Suitability mapping of rainwater management strategies
  17. Global OLM OUTCOMES Used by: Knowledge, Attitude and skills Practice changes changes Main Actor groups NDBC Outputs Experience RMS that actually Evidence at the Farmers and Tools for RMS planning at work Test, adapt and adopt RMS IMPACT lanscape level Farming community, national and Greater capacity to engage in regional level developed Communities collective action in resource use RMS Synthesis, Scenarios, Maps and and tested and management Policy Makers and Tools for planning investors (scaling up) Institutions and incentives Maps identifying what for RMS implementation Receive better incentives to do Use more effective tools for planning for RMS work best and identified and their work, are more aware of RMS at landscape scale and to negotiate where in the basin strengthened benefits and cumulative impacts fair use and win- win solutions for the of strategic trans- insttitutional available resources Analysis of the best Networks / platforms for RWS Planners at boundary work on RWM Improve planning, decision making and land use systems for improved RWM in local, national and Stengthen ability to use tools, resource allocation processes different parts of the identified and regional levels such as integrated planning and Work beyond traditional institutional basin strengthened scenario analysis boundaries Improved farming livelihoods + Communication, documentation and Actively create market opportunities and More resilient social and ecological Impact assessment of Increased adoption, adaptation and synthesis developed and incentive mechanisms, systems Have an increased promotion of effective RMS future widespread used facilitate institutions, understanding of the benefits of Work beyond traditional institutional Improved food adoption of improved Researchers at influence the RWM research approaches, of boundaries and employ participatory security RMS in the Ethiopian national and basin investment of time and different landscapes and of the research methods, considering gender Highlands levels money in RWM systems socio-economic contexts and end user priorities Have improved skills in spatial Conduct research on fundamental basin analysis, scenario analysis and problems modeling Promote more problem-oriented RWM research in university curricula Have improved access to inputs, Regional and local Evidence-based planning and decision negotiate land use policy and policy makers making supportive of RWMS can facilitate community action
  18. http://nilebdc.org
Advertisement