Thoughts on Promoting Inclusiveness      in Dairy Development       A. Omore, L. Kurwijila, S. Worsley    Tanzania Nationa...
Key questionsGiven current status and desire to extend the frontiers ofcommercial dairy value chains in Tanzania….• Where ...
More Milk in Tanzania ProjectA recent synthesis identified 4inter-related key problems
Key problems                                       More Milk in Tanzania Project1. Dominant direct milk sales of small vol...
Key problems (cont’d)2. Credit facilities are lacking. This contributes to low access   to basic inputs and services or wo...
Huge seasonal fluctuation in milk                                  supply from traditional herd                           ...
Large yield gaps:                                6000Milk yield per Lactation (Kg)                                5000    ...
Low per capita milk consumption        Per capita milk consumption in EAC countries (Kenya, 2009; Rwanda 2011, Tanzania 20...
Gap between investments in milk                       prodn., collection and processing capacity                          ...
Underutilisation of current milkcollection capacity  Region                   No. Of milk          Milk collected         ...
Examples of promotion of industry vs.inclusivenessIndustry approach              Inclusiveness approach1. Invest where the...
DDF is in a good position to promote inclusivenessand complement specific projectsPossible DDF roles1.   Promoting a more ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Thoughts on promoting inclusiveness in dairy development

3,320 views

Published on

Presented by A. Omore, L. Kurwijila and S. Worsley at the Tanzania National Dairy Stakeholders’ Meeting, Dar es Salaam, 22 February 2013

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
3,320
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2,671
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
25
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • This template can be used as a starter file for presenting training materials in a group setting.SectionsRight-click on a slide to add sections. Sections can help to organize your slides or facilitate collaboration between multiple authors.NotesUse the Notes section for delivery notes or to provide additional details for the audience. View these notes in Presentation View during your presentation. Keep in mind the font size (important for accessibility, visibility, videotaping, and online production)Coordinated colors Pay particular attention to the graphs, charts, and text boxes.Consider that attendees will print in black and white or grayscale. Run a test print to make sure your colors work when printed in pure black and white and grayscale.Graphics, tables, and graphsKeep it simple: If possible, use consistent, non-distracting styles and colors.Label all graphs and tables.
  • Use pictures
  • Thoughts on promoting inclusiveness in dairy development

    1. 1. Thoughts on Promoting Inclusiveness in Dairy Development A. Omore, L. Kurwijila, S. Worsley Tanzania National Dairy Stakeholders’ Meeting Dar es Salaam, 22 February 2013
    2. 2. Key questionsGiven current status and desire to extend the frontiers ofcommercial dairy value chains in Tanzania….• Where are the new frontiers?• What has so far hindered dairy development in these areas? • What are the main technological challenges? • What are the main organisational challenges? • What are the policy and institutional barriers, whether written and un-written (mind-sets)? • What kinds of partnerships can overcome the challenges?
    3. 3. More Milk in Tanzania ProjectA recent synthesis identified 4inter-related key problems
    4. 4. Key problems More Milk in Tanzania Project1. Dominant direct milk sales of small volumes that preclude economies of scale, resulting in high costs of production and marketing Milk marketing outlets (NBS, 2003) Milk Buyer % Neighbours 86.1 Local market 5.5 Secondary market 0.5 Processors 1.4 Large scale farms 0.2 3% Processed milk Trader at farm 4.5 and dairy products Other 1.7 Informally TOTAL 100.0 97% marketed raw milk (liitle value addition)
    5. 5. Key problems (cont’d)2. Credit facilities are lacking. This contributes to low access to basic inputs and services or working capital to purchase them3. Lack of appropriate organizational models for pre- commercial producers. These are required to facilitate collective action4. Seasonality of rainfall and related effects are strong. This is reflected in producers’ management of their animals’ reproductive cycle and transhumance. It exacerbates seasonality of feed availability and milk volumes
    6. 6. Huge seasonal fluctuation in milk supply from traditional herd Milk collection by a small scale processor from traditional herd in Morogoro, 2009 13000 12500 12000 11500 11000 10500 10000 9500Volume of milk (litres/month) 9000 8500 8000 7500 7000 6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month Average/month Total supply
    7. 7. Large yield gaps: 6000Milk yield per Lactation (Kg) 5000 x3 4000 x3 x3 3000 x3 2000 x2 y2 x2 1000 x1 x1 0 y1 Indigenous Crossbred Exotic Indigenous Crossbreds Synthetics Exotics Mixed rain fed Mixed rain fed Large-scale temperate/highlan humid/sub-humid commercial ranches d Xi = Yield gaps due to “animal husbandry practices” : 33 - 76 % Yi = Gap in productivity due to “genotype”: 18 - 74% Source: Mwacharo et al., 2009
    8. 8. Low per capita milk consumption Per capita milk consumption in EAC countries (Kenya, 2009; Rwanda 2011, Tanzania 2010 amd Uganda 2009)220200180160140120 Per capita100 WHO recommendation80604020 0 Kenya Rwanda Tanzania Uganda
    9. 9. Gap between investments in milk prodn., collection and processing capacity Gap between investments in milk prodn1. , collection and processing2 (1NBS , 2003 and 2TDB data 2012) 110000 105000 100000 95000 90000 85000 80000 75000Volume of milk/day 70000 65000 60000 Marketable surplus milk /d (28% of wet season 55000 NBS-2003) 50000 Processing capacity (2012) 45000 40000 35000 Milk collection capacity (2012) 30000 25000 20000 Milk collected l/day (2012) 15000 10000 5000 0 Region
    10. 10. Underutilisation of current milkcollection capacity Region No. Of milk Milk collected Utilised % MCC collection units (l/d) capacity capacity (coolers) (l/d) utilisation Arusha 17 2,600 3,280 (-) Kilimanjaro 9 10,400 3,580 34 Mara 57 92,000 12,500 14 Kagera 3 (-) 150 (-) Mwanza 1 1,500 (-) (-) Tanga 42 95,900 40,734 42 Morogoro 9 19,300 6,266 32 Coast 8 5950 2998 50 Iringa 12 (-) 3,255 (-) Mbeya 26 17,238 19,874 115 184 (55) 243,478 94,137 38.7 source :TDB data 2012; ( - )=+ incomplete data
    11. 11. Examples of promotion of industry vs.inclusivenessIndustry approach Inclusiveness approach1. Invest where there are 1. Target the poor likely to be high returns <$2/day2. Go where there’s 2. Go to marginalised already some dairy areas development 3. Meet the small-scale producers in there3. Promote capital current markets, that intensive approaches are often informal like chilling plants 4. Explore working with4. Promote modern current assets of the breeds only poor, including traditional breeds
    12. 12. DDF is in a good position to promote inclusivenessand complement specific projectsPossible DDF roles1. Promoting a more inclusive orientation in investments through strengthening of public-private partnerships2. Promoting professionalization and best practices3. Acting as a platform for information and knowledge sharing including: • as a national innovation platform to address systemic bottlenecks and co-create solutions • facilitating mentoring of milk-shed level dairy innovation platforms

    ×