More meat, milk, and fish by and for the poor: CGIAR Research Program 3.7

2,261 views

Published on

Presented by Tom Randolph to the 2nd Multi-stakeholder Platform Meeting Agenda for Action for Sustainable Livestock Sector Development, Phuket, Thailand, 2 December 2011

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
2,261
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1,134
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
15
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

More meat, milk, and fish by and for the poor: CGIAR Research Program 3.7

  1. 1. More meat, milk, and fish by and for the poor CGIAR Research Program 3.7 Presented to the 2 nd Multi-stakeholder Platform Meeting Agenda for Action for Sustainable Livestock Sector Development Phuket 2 December 2011
  2. 2. CGIAR Change process <ul><li>Perceived lack of impact </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Lack of focus, inefficiencies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Lack of funding stability </li></ul></ul><ul><li>New! CGIAR Consortium & Fund Council </li></ul><ul><li>CGIAR Research Programs </li></ul><ul><li>Transition ongoing </li></ul>
  3. 3. Outline of Presentation <ul><li>CGIAR Change process </li></ul><ul><li>Purpose of consultation </li></ul><ul><li>CRP3.7 Concept </li></ul><ul><li>Operationalizing CRP3.7 </li></ul>
  4. 4. CRP3.7 on Livestock & Fish <ul><li>April-May 2010: Concept note </li></ul><ul><li>June-Sept 2010: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Proposal development </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Stakeholder consultation </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Feb-May 2011: Comments and revisions </li></ul><ul><li>July 2011: Fund Council approves with ‘ light adjustments ’ </li></ul><ul><li>Official start: January 2012 </li></ul>
  5. 5. Purpose for this consultation <ul><li>Stakeholders shaped CRP3.7 proposal </li></ul><ul><ul><li>FARA meeting in July 2010 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Stakeholder meeting in August 2010 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>E-consultation June 2010-June 2011 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Continue spirit of consultation now CRP3.7 has been approved </li></ul><ul><li>How are we planning to implement CRP3.7? </li></ul><ul><li>How are we addressing environmental concerns </li></ul>
  6. 6. Goal More meat, milk and fish by and for the poor To sustainably increase the productivity of small-scale livestock and fish systems to increase the availability and affordability of animal-source-foods for poor consumers and, in doing so, reduce poverty through greater participation by the poor along the whole value chains for animal-source foods.
  7. 7. Goal More meat, milk and fish … for the poor To sustainably increase the productivity of small-scale livestock and fish systems to increase the availability and affordability of animal-source-foods for poor consumers and, in doing so, reduce poverty through greater participation by the poor along the whole value chains for animal-source foods.
  8. 8. Goal More meat, milk and fish by … the poor To sustainably increase the productivity of small-scale livestock and fish systems to increase the availability and affordability of animal-source-foods for poor consumers and, in doing so, reduce poverty through greater participation by the poor along the whole value chains for animal-source foods .
  9. 9. Basic Idea: Solution-driven R4D to achieve impact Past research has focused specific aspects of given value chains, commodities and country. ...in Country A ...in Country D ...in Country C ...in Country B Traditional approach was piecemeal Consumers Consumers Consumers Consumers
  10. 10. R4D integrated to transform selected value chains In targeted commodities and countries. Value chain development team + research partners We propose a focus on integrated value-chains for bigger impact . . . Approach: Solution-driven R4D to achieve impact Consumers
  11. 11. <ul><li>Strategic CRP 3.7 Cross-cutting Platforms </li></ul><ul><li>Technology Generation </li></ul><ul><li>Market Innovation </li></ul><ul><li>Targeting & Impact </li></ul>R4D integrated to transform selected value chains In targeted commodities and countries. Value chain development team + research partners GLOBAL RESEARCH PUBLIC GOODS INTERVENTIONS TO SCALE OUT REGIONALLY . . . combined with strategic cross-cutting platforms for scaling out. Major intervention with development partners Approach: Solution-driven R4D to achieve impact Consumers
  12. 12. Getting to impact <ul><li>Serving as Knowledge Partner in development interventions </li></ul><ul><li>Goal: catalyze large-scale intervention to transform target value chain </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Smart design </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Generate convincing evidence </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Attract investment </li></ul></ul></ul>
  13. 13. Delivering CRP3.7 Livestock + Fish Structure: Three integrated Components 1 Technology development: − Genetics − Feeds − Health Consumers Commodity X in Country Y 2 Value chain development 3 Targeting: Foresight, prioritization, gender, impact assessment Cross-cutting: M&E, communications, capacity building
  14. 14. 9 Target Value Chains PIGS AQUACULTURE SHEEP & GOATS DAIRY
  15. 15. 3-year Budget Envelope by Center TOTAL = US$99.6 million
  16. 16. 3-year Budget Envelope by Component TOTAL = US$99.6 million
  17. 17. Initial Work Plan: Technology Development <ul><li>Animal health, genetics, feeds: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Assess constraints from pro-poor value chain lens </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Identify best-bet interventions </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Animal health </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Continued work on key diseases: ECF, CBPP, PPR, African Swine fever </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Livestock and fish genetics </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Community-breeding schemes, fish improvement programs </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Feeds </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Improved food-feed crops, forages </li></ul></ul>
  18. 18. Initial Work Plan: Value chain development <ul><ul><li>Frameworks, tools for VC assessment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Link to CRP2 led by IFPRI </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Partner engagement – R&D alliances </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Site selection process </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Rapid and in-depth VC assessment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Situational analysis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Testing & generating evidence for best-bet interventions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Action-research to get to solutions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Conventional trials to ensure credible </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>evidence </li></ul></ul>
  19. 19. Initial Work Plan: Targeting, gender, M&E <ul><li>Targeting </li></ul><ul><ul><li>GIS and trend analysis of target value chains regionally and nationally </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Gender & equity </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Tools and reviews </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Priority interventions </li></ul></ul><ul><li>M&E and impact assessment </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Frameworks and indicators </li></ul></ul>
  20. 20. Environmental concerns <ul><li>Growing value chains will have environmental implications </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Expanded carbon footprint, more GHG </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Stress on eco-services, degradation </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Social: over-consumption of animal-source foods? </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Good: improved productivity reduces GHG/unit product </li></ul></ul></ul>
  21. 21. Actions to address environmental concerns <ul><li>Articulate Environment strategy </li></ul><ul><li>(as addendum to proposal) </li></ul>
  22. 22. Environment Component added NEW! Environmental impact assessment Structure: Three integrated Components 1 Technology development: − Genetics − Feeds − Health Consumers Commodity X in Country Y 2 Value chain development 3 Targeting: Foresight & prioritization, gender, impact assessment Cross-cutting: M&E, communications, capacity building
  23. 23. Actions to address environmental concerns <ul><li>Articulate Environment strategy </li></ul><ul><li>Add Environment Component to structure </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Trade-off analysis for water, land and biomass use </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Appropriately adapted Life Cycle Analysis for value chain (ex. WF study) </li></ul><ul><li>Environmental monitoring plan </li></ul><ul><li>Evaluate implications of proposed technologies and value chain interventions </li></ul>
  24. 24. Relevance for the Agenda of Action <ul><li>Closing the efficiency gap </li></ul><ul><ul><li> improving productivity in small-scale systems </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Grasslands ?? </li></ul><ul><li>Reduced discharge – manure management </li></ul><ul><ul><li> easier to manage in small-scale systems as integrated crop-livestock production or with manure as a marketable by-product </li></ul></ul>
  25. 25. CRP 4
  26. 26. Discussion Points <ul><li>Does our approach on environmental issues adequately address your thematic areas? </li></ul><ul><li>Are we missing other key environmental concerns? </li></ul><ul><li>What lessons can you offer on how research can better work with development partners to stimulate pro-poor value chain development? </li></ul><ul><li>Obviously the private sector is key to sustainability of our target value chains. What have we learned about research successfully engaging the private sector? Examples? </li></ul>
  27. 27. More meat, milk and fish by and for the poor We wish to thank FAO for allowing this opportunity to consult with our core stakeholders

×