Zoonotic transmission of tuberculosis – the importance of a One Health approach
Loading in ... 3
1 of 1
Top clipped slide
Slaughterhouse workers as sentinels of zoonotic disease
Jun. 15, 2013•0 likes
0 likes
Be the first to like this
Show More
•910 views
views
Total views
0
On Slideshare
0
From embeds
0
Number of embeds
0
Download to read offline
Report
Technology
Poster by E.A.J. Cook, L.F. Thomas, W.A. de Glanville, B.M.D. Bronsvoort, S. Kariuki and E.M. Fèvre presented at the Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases (ASID) annual scientific meeting, Canberra, Australia, 20-23 March 2013.
Slaughterhouse workers as sentinels of zoonotic disease
Slaughterhouse Zoonoses
Slaughterhouse workers as sentinels of zoonotic disease
E.A.J. Cook1,2
, L.F. Thomas1,2
, W.A. de Glanville1,2
, B.M.D.Bronsvoort3
, S. Kariuki4
and E.M. Fèvre1,2
Slaughterhouse workers are high risk for zoonoses due to contact with animals
Slaughterhouse workers may act as reservoirs of zoonotic organisms
Workers are often first exposed in zoonotic disease outbreaks
No previous studies in Kenya investigating zoonoses in slaughterhouse workers
Background
Materials and methods
1Centre for Infectious Diseases and Centre for Immunity,
Infection and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth
Laboratories, West Mains Rd, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT UK
2International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI),
Old Naivasha Road, PO Box, 30709-00100,
Nairobi, Kenya
3Epidemiology, Economics and Risk Assessment
Group, The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh,
Easter Bush, EH25 9RG, UK
4Centre for Microbiology Research,
Kenya Medical Research Institute
PO Box 54840 , 00100, Nairobi, Kenya
Objective
Determine exposure to
zoonoses in
slaughterhouse workers
Outcomes
Prevalence of zoonoses
Risk factors associated
with carriage
Study site
45km radius from
Busia, Kenya
142 slaughter-
houses
738 slaughter-
house workers
Sampling
Questionnaire
- Risk factors
- Knowledge of
zoonoses
Blood
Faeces
Sample analysis
Blood smear
Faecal exam
Q fever
Brucellosis
Cysticercosis
Rift Valley Fever
Leptospirosis
Data analysis
Logistic regression
- odds ratios for
risk factors to
zoonotic pathogens
Results—to date
Disease % 95% CI
Malaria n=738 15 12-18
Schistosomiasis n=698 5 3-7
Hookworm n=698 31 28-34
HIV Type 1 n=500 12 9-15
Cysticercosis n=338 1 0-2
Brucellosis n=338 0 0
Thanks to the MRC, Wellcome Trust, ILRI and the University of Edinburgh for supporting this work
Key findings
Workers with secondary education
are more aware of zoonoses
OR=1.9 95%CI=1.22, 2.93 Chi-squared=9.37 1 d.f. P= 0.00
Workers with knowledge of zoonoses
are more likely to wear protective
clothing
OR=1.92 95%CI=1.31, 2.86 Chi-squared=12.08 1 d.f. P=0.0
Workers that appear drunk are more
likely to have an open wound
OR=3.14 95%CI=1.5, 6.23, Chi-squared=12.79 1 d.f. P=0.00
Workers that slaughter sick animals
are also more likely to eat at work
OR=1.7 95%CI=1.01, 2.78 Chi-squared=4.82, 1 d.f., P=0.03
Knowledge and practices n=738 %
Knowledge of zoonoses 31
Protective clothing worn 52
Eat at the slaughterhouse 20
Slaughter sick animals 17
Appeared drunk at interview 11
Had an open wound 8
Conclusions and Future plans
Hygiene in slaughterhouses in western Kenya is poor
A number of risk factors for zoonotic disease exposure are identified
Workers have high prevalence of endemic disease
Serology testing for zoonoses will be completed in July 2013
Results will be compared to seroprevalence in the general population
Fig 1 Map of slaughterhouses in study area
in western Kenya