Capacity building on ‘ecohealth’ in Southeast Asia – successes and challenges
Fred Unger1; Delia Grace2, Rainer Asse3, Korapin Tohtubtiang4, Jeffrey Gilbert5 1International Livestock Research Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam; 2International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya; 3Rainer Asse, International Livestock Research Institute*, Bangkok, Thailand; 4Korapin Tohtubtiang, International Livestock Research Institute*, Bangkok, Thailand; 5Jeffrey Gilbert, International Livestock Research Institute*, Vientiane, Lao *Until Dec 2013
Pictures
•
Ecohealth-(One Health) Resource Centre's integrated in the university structure in both centre’s
•
Policy dialogue and briefs
•
Teams accepted the use and recognised the strengths of combined qualitative and quantitative tools
•
Change of silo-practice and promotion of regular meetings between MoA & MoH (e.g. Yunnan, China)
Fred Unger, F.Unger@cgiar.org ● ILRI, Hanoi, Vietnam ● +84 129 295 1750 (mobile) http://aghealth.wordpress.com ● www.ilri.org Acknowledgements: The CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH) and the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) Funding: This project was funded by the International Development Research Centre, Canada (IDRC)
This document is licensed for use under a Creative Commons Attribution –Non commercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License September 2014
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Challenges
Beef farm, Yunnan, Unger, 2011
To address current challenges related to disease emergences in livestock and humans, new integrated approaches are needed to promote collaboration between involved actors and groups towards more effective control. Southeast Asia is considered a hotspot for diseases emergence as demonstrated with Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Such new approaches include the ‘ecohealth’ (EH) concept, an approach pioneered over the last decades by the International Development Research Centre, Canada (IDRC).
Objective: To promote & build up capacity of EH for the control of zoonotic emerging infectious diseases (ZEIDs)
•
Time frame: 2007 and 2013
•
Where: 6 Southeast Asian countries
•
‘learning by doing’ approach
EcoHealth One Health Resource Centre at Chiang Mai University
•
Center operates independently from seed funds
•
Scaling out of EH training
Case study: Hygiene in small-scale poultry slaughterhouses (2 countries)
•
PhD student with EH topic
2 Ecohealth-(One Health) Resource centres established:
•
Capacity building, research (multi-faculty), communication
•
Training manuals, case studies, EH courses, PhD & MSc students incorporated EH in their thesis, EH ideas incorporated by students in KKN (Community Services) 6 Case studies:
•
Multi-institutional studies on food-borne diseases or zoonoses following EH principles
Risk of brucellosis and toxoplasmosis, Yunnan, China
•
First use of PRA and joint field study of MoH/MoA
Zoonotic causes of acute diarrhoea, Cambodia
•
First joint field study and community feedback MoH/MAF
Prevalence of priority pig zoonoses, Lao
•
Joint MoH/MAF and feedback to communities
Determining priority zoonoses, South Vietnam
•
First joint application of PRA tools
Rabies control and prevention, Bali
•
Ecology-focussed: behaviour, demography, fecundity, socio-cultural
EcoHealth Resource Centre at Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta
•
Center operates independently from seed funds
Successes
•
All teams have presented their case studies at international conferences
•
Writing of publications in local languages and submitting to international peer-reviewed journals is ongoing
•
Follow-up EH research proposals have been developed and funded for selected teams
•
1st Regional EH symposium organized for Southeast Asia (2013), 2nd planned for 2015 hosted by Ecohealth-(One Health) Resource Centre
•
EH uptake demonstrated through outcome mapping for all teams
Research into use
•
Various and complex
•
‘loose’ definitions of ‘ecohealth’
•
Find consensus on research topics and sharing of budgets
•
Language and cultural barriers, silo thinking
•
Qualitative meet quantitative researchers (initially limited understanding among both groups)
•
Lack of qualitative research skills in most of teams but also on proposal writing, study design and analysis
•
‘transaction’ costs for collaboration
Example for focus group discussion “prior” (left) and after training of researchers, Yunnan. Unger 2012