Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to OARI progress report on N2Africa bridging year in Ethiopia (2013) (20)

More from ILRI(20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded(20)

OARI progress report on N2Africa bridging year in Ethiopia (2013)

  1. በሀዋሳ ዩኒቨርሰቲ የም ጋር በመተ HAWASSA UN DIRECTOR OARI progress report on N2Africa bridging year in Ethiopia (2013) Putting nitrogen fixation to work for smallholder farmers in Africa Zerihun Abebe, OARI N2Africa Ethiopia Launch Workshop, ILRI 27-28 February 2014
  2. PRESENTATION OUTLINES  PROJECT ACTIVITIES UNDERTAKEN IN 2013 1. CB Diss/Demo, Input & Variety Trials 2. SB Diss/Demo, Input& Variety Trials 3. FB Diss/Demo, Input & Variety Trials  PROMOTION ACTIVITIES UNDERTAKEN  LEASSON LEARNT  CHALLENGES  WAYS FORWARD IN TO 2014
  3. R- P- Anger R+ P+, Anger R- P- Nasir R+ P+, Nasir Baby trial plot, Mr. Bedasa Mosisa, Oda haro kebele, Bako tibe district, 09/08/13 DEMONSTRATION TRIALS FOR CB
  4. Inside of a functional nodule +R +P Common bean var. Nasir -R -P Common bean var. (Nasir) -R -P and +R +P Commonbean var. (Nasir)
  5. Soil fertility variation in addition to agronomic management across targeted farmers ? (GL × RS) × E xM 100 450 800 1150 1500 1850 2200 2550 2900 3250 3600 3950 4300 4650 100 450 800 1150 1500 1850 2200 2550 2900 3250 3600 3950 Nasir(-P+ -R) Nasir(+P+ +R) Anger(+P+ +R) Anger (-P+ -R) yield (kg/ha)of Nasir variety without input application yield(kg/ha)CBwith-veand+veinputs
  6. Common bean was significantly responded to the inputs Nasir variety more responded to +P and R+ than Anger Common Diss/Demo trials at Bako Tibe district,2013 34% 144%
  7. 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 Nasir(-P+ -R) Nasir(+P+ +R) Anger (-P+ -R) Anger(+P+ +R) Organic carbon(%) Grainyield(kg/ha) OC has +ve correlation with Grain yield 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 0 2 4 6 8 10 Nasir(-P+ -R) Nasir(+P+ +R) Anger (-P+ -R) Anger(+P+ +R) Available P(mg kg-1) Grainyield(kg) P has linear correlation with yield  Soil Organic carbon and available P correlated with yield Thus, improvement of the soil carbon and pH are crucial
  8. Field performances of CB input trials R+ P+ R+ P--R+ P- R- P+ CB input trial
  9. Significant effect on grain yield 55-85%
  10. CB variety trial
  11. Result summery of baby and mother trials on soybean at Gobu Sayo,2013
  12. Ethio(- P+R-) Ethio( P+R+)Didesa(- P+R-) Didesa((P+R+)
  13. 134 pods per plant Litter fall cover the soil +P +R+-P +R- At harvesting
  14. 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Didessa (+P+ +R) Didessa (-P+ -R) Ethio (+P+ +R) Ethio (-P+ -R) Grainyield(kg/ha) yield of Didesa( kg/ha) with -P+R- Land history
  15. 45% 19%
  16. Other promotion activities
  17. Awareness Creation for host farmers before planting 45 house holds were participated
  18. 220 males 65 females Exchange field visits ( 3 sites)
  19. Methods of Inoculants application
  20. 125 Male + 25 Female at O/haro 55 M + 15 F at T/sangota 95 M + 10 F at D/dima We trained Inoculation method
  21. distributed 400 IN ENGLISHIN AFAN OROMO
  22. Worry for bean market Farmers assure that monocropping is common practices Farmers’ Perception
  23. CHALLENGES  Critical shortage of vehicle  Shortage of training (long and short)  Problem of soybean value chain  Extreme variability in soil fertility ( 80% farm field is < 5 pH of soil)  Mono cropping practices  Serious disease problem ( Chocolate spot of FB)  Inefficient inoculants on FB  Un adequate and untimely budget release  Untimely start of the project ( late planting)
  24. LESSON LERNT  inoculants are promising in enhancing bean yield  Yield variability across the farmers’ field is high  Both P and inoculants are important for common bean, but P rate is low  Different CB,FB and SB varieties respond differently, best varieties were identified  OC and available P are +vely correlated with bean yield ( improvement is important)  Soil acidity management is critical issue  Farmers were aware to use inoculants
  25. Way forward for 2014  Early start and procurement of the input materials as much as possible  Further scaling up  Issue of soil acidity management  Revision of P application rates  Strengthen approaches of scaling up( e.g innovation plot form)  Focus on value chains for soybean  Improving soil OC  Focus for FB disease and compatible inoculants
Advertisement