Advertisement
Can asset transfer and asset protection policies alter poverty dynamics in northern Kenya?
Upcoming SlideShare
Comparing FISP to Alternative ProgramsComparing FISP to Alternative Programs
Loading in ... 3
1 of 1
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to Can asset transfer and asset protection policies alter poverty dynamics in northern Kenya?(20)

More from ILRI(20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded(20)

Can asset transfer and asset protection policies alter poverty dynamics in northern Kenya?

  1. Research Objectives 1. To measure the individual impacts of REAP and KLIP-like insurance subsidies on the extent and depth of poverty. 2. To compare those impacts to those of a package that combines both. 3. To identify the optimal implementation design for most cost-effectively meeting each program’s mission by: i. Testing the efficacy of different premium subsidy structures for increasing IBLI uptake, and ii. Evaluating the economic and social spillovers of the REAP program within communities. 4. To test ways for making IBLI insurance relevant to women who are directly & indirectly exposed to drought risk. Contact Persons Nathan Jensen: n.jensen@cgiar.org Stephen Karuntimi Stephen.Karuntimi@bomaproject.org Michael Carter mrcarter@ucdavis.edu This document is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. September 2018 Motivation To assess the impact of two pioneering interventions that should synergistically interact to sustainably reduce poverty and vulnerability amongst households in northern Kenya. Research Design Sampling: A stratified random sample of 1,875 community-identified poor and vulnerable households containing a female adult in northern Samburu County. Treatment Arms: 1. Control: Poor and vulnerable households with no encouragement to purchase IBLI. 2. IBLI: Poor and vulnerable households receive a premium discount for IBLI. 3. REAP: Poor households have the opportunity to participate in the REAP program but who receive with no encouragement to purchase IBLI. 4. REAP + IBLI: Poor households have the opportunity to participate in the REAP program and receive a premium discount for IBLI. Interventions Index Based Livestock Insurance (IBLI) • Insurance policies make payments when forage conditions are much worse than normal to protect households from drought. • Policies are sold by Takaful Insurance of Africa, a local insurance company, and reinsured in international markets. • The GoK is also making IBLI transfers to 18,000 targeted households under the Kenya Livestock Insurance Program (KLIP). Rural Entrepreneur Access Program (REAP) • The program aims to help poor women graduate from poverty by helping them start sustainable businesses. • Eligible women are selected through community wealth ranking followed by household-level validation. • The program facilitates the formation of 3-women business groups that are the foundation of each intervention. Can Asset Transfer & Asset Protection Policies Alter Poverty Dynamics in Northern Kenya? Allocation of Surveyed Participants Across Treatment Arms Wealth Group Control IBLI Only REAP Only REAP + IBLI Total Poor 407 405 350 340 1,502 Vulnerable 186 187 * * 373 Better off * * * * Total 593 592 350 340 1,875 * Out of the sampling frame. . Workplan Project Timeline 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 J M M J S N J M M J S N J M M J S N J M M J S N J M ILRI • Baseline Survey x x • Coupon Distribution x x x x x x • Midline Survey x x • Endline Survey x x BOMA • BOMA targeting x • REAP wave 1 * E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G • REAP wave 2 * E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G • REAP wave 3 * E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G • REAP wave 4 * E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G • REAP wave 5 * E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G TIA • TIA Sales Window x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x * (E= Enroll, ~ =Participate, G=Graduate) Food security (7-days recall) is extremely high in the project participants 3 types of discount coupons provide different types of subsidies to participants: flat-rate (KLIP), increasing & falling Participant Characteristics (Baseline) • All participants are women • 87% of participants have no formal education • 23% (25%) of households are nomadic (partially sedentary) • Average household herd size is 2.2 TLUs • > 65% of reported income is related to livestock • > 90% of households live on income < $1/person/day Drought is the leading cause of livestock mortality in the region IBLI purchases by study households in 2018 No. of Policies Coverage (KSH) Coverage (TLUs) Premium Discount Client Contribution Standard sales 156 4,232,000 302 504,000 0 504,000 Coupon-related sales 282 12,659,000 904 1,488,000 1,278,000 210,000 Total 438 16,891,000 1,206 1,992,000 1,278,000 713,000
Advertisement