Advertisement
Participatory assessment of animal health constraints and husbandry practices in the pig production system in three districts of Uganda
Upcoming SlideShare
Participatory assessment of animal health constraints and husbandry practices...Participatory assessment of animal health constraints and husbandry practices...
Loading in ... 3
1 of 1
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to Participatory assessment of animal health constraints and husbandry practices in the pig production system in three districts of Uganda(20)

Advertisement

More from ILRI(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

Participatory assessment of animal health constraints and husbandry practices in the pig production system in three districts of Uganda

  1. Unlocking livestock development potential through science, influence and capacity development ILRI APM, Addis Ababa, 15-17 May 2013 Participatory assessment of animal health constraints and husbandry practices in the pig production system in three districts of Uganda This document is licensed for use under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported Licence May 2013 Michel M. Dione, Emily A. Ouma, Kristina Rosel, Lawrence Mayega, Gideon Nadiope, David Kyriabwire and Danilo Pezo Introduction  Pork has become increasingly important in Uganda. Whereas pork accounted for only 1-2 % of the 11-12 kg/yr per capita meat consumption in the 1960s, it now accounts for at least a third of the current 10 kg/yr.  Pigs help both rural and urban households to improve livelihood security and also serve as a source of cash in times of need.  Animal health constraints have been identified as one of the major limiting productivity factors. Objectives  To identify animal health and management constraints and opportunities for intervention in the smallholder pig value chains in Uganda. Methodology  Focus group discussions were conducted on stratified random samples, based on sex, of about 1400 pig farmers in 35 villages in Masaka, Kamuli and Mukono districts using a semi-qualitative interview checklist  Quantitative data, such as proportions and disease parameters were obtained through group consensus.  Findings were further triangulated with secondary data during the exercise. Results  Pig housing are dominated by tethering (66 %) and free range/scavenging systems (17 %) in rural settings; 66 % and 87 % of farmers confine the pigs in houses in peri-urban and urban settings respectively.  African swine fever is the first cause of pig mortality with epidemics commonly occurring during dry season (Table 1, Figure 1). Worms and ecto-parasites namely mites, lice, midges, ticks and jiggers are endemic (Figure 2), which along with poor nutrition, lead to stunted growth which causes reduced market value of pigs  Diarrhea and malnutrition are common in piglets and are associated with poor hygiene and feeding respectively. Swine erysipelas, and Foot and Mouth-Disease are sporadic, and could occur once or twice a year (Figure 1).  Indigenous treatments are sometime used in replacement of commercial drugs. These treatments include human urine and decoctions of local herbs for African swine fever and the use of disposed engine oil or tobacco extracts for ecto-parasites.  93% of farmers declare practicing deworming of their pigs; 37% practice ecto-parasite spraying and 77% castrate their pigs.  The main constraints affecting animal health as identified by farmers are poor housing and feeding, weak veterinary services, faked drugs and lack of knowledge on piggery management.  Some of the actions already attempted by farmers to overcome those constraints are the organization of groups for capacity building and utilizing professional health workers. However, they believe that the government as well as R&D institutions, should assist them in improving facilities and management by providing training on better pig husbandry practices and health, and helping to get access to funding to enable them to improve farm infrastructure, i.e., corrals, drainage. Disease Morbidity (%) Mortality (%) Case fatality (%) ASF 29 67 >100 Worms infection 37 14 39 Mange mite 16 7 43 Diarrhea 6 5 86 Lice infestation 5 1 24 Malnutrition 4 3 66 FMD 1 0.0 6 Midge infestation 1 0.2 18 *Others 1 0.5 73 Acknowledgments To IFAD –EU for providing the funds for the SPVCD project, DVOs of Masaka, Mukono and Kamuli, and the VEDCO staff in Kamuli, the FGD facilitators, and farmers who participated in the FGDs openly providing most of the information reported in this study. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Rainfall ASF Worms Diarrhea Malnutrition FMD 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Rainfall Mite Lice Jigger Midge Ticks Conclusion Animal health is a limiting factor in the pig production system in Uganda; therefore, there is a need for building capacity of technology service providers and farmers to tackle these problems. These primary findings will support the identification of best-bet interventions toward improving animal health in the smallholder pig value chains in Uganda. *Swine erysipelas, anemia, ticks, jiggers, heat stress, undiagnosed diseases usually related to sudden death Table 1: List of priority diseases in the pig sector in Uganda * FMD was reported in only one village (kirumba-Katwe) in Masaka district Figure 1: Seasonal variation in disease occurrence *jiggers were only reported in Kamuli district Figure 2: Seasonal variation in occurrence of ecto-parasites
Advertisement