Advertisement
Maziwa Zaidi (More Milk) in Tanzania―Best-bet technologies and innovations: Public−Private−Partnership in animal health delivery
Upcoming SlideShare
Mhfmhw2011kickoffMhfmhw2011kickoff
Loading in ... 3
1 of 1
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to Maziwa Zaidi (More Milk) in Tanzania―Best-bet technologies and innovations: Public−Private−Partnership in animal health delivery (20)

Advertisement

More from ILRI(20)

Advertisement

Maziwa Zaidi (More Milk) in Tanzania―Best-bet technologies and innovations: Public−Private−Partnership in animal health delivery

  1. Maziwa Zaidi (More Milk) in Tanzania: Best-bet Technologies and Innovations Public-Private-Partnership in Animal Health Delivery Henry Kiara, Ambrose Munene, I. Omondi, D.D. Wako, S.O.Takal, B. Bett, G. Wamwere-Njoroge Key messages and solutions • Livestock diseases are responsible for more than 25% productivity losses although animal health products are available to significantly reduce the loss • Delivery of animal health services is dominated by the public sector and are mostly inadequate • A partnership between the public and private sector can greatly improve delivery of animal health services • Better delivery would lead to healthier more productive animals and healthier people Opportunities and benefits • Public sector does not have the resources to provide all the animal health services needed to improve livestock productivity. It requires partnership with the private sector to supplement public sector efforts. Private sector is willing to invest in animal services delivery if appropriate policies are in place. • Types of agribusiness best suited to deliver the innovation • Private input providers • Producer organizations • Professional bodies Pictures Suitability • Government deliberate effort to let private sector provide some services and create the necessary policy and legal framework • It is not limited to any agroecology but more likely succeed where private sector is already established Evidence • Private sector is already involved in the delivery of AH services in many countries • OIE has encourage countries to develop policies that include private sector in their public veterinary services • Private sector is generally more efficient than the public sector in many cases. • Since it is business led mostly it would work • Requires appropriate policies by the public sector to enable investment by the private sector This document has a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. October 2019 March 2017 Problem statement • Enough animal health products are available to deal with the major livestock diseases • Due to poor AH delivery, livestock diseases continue to be a major constraint to improving productivity • Poor AH services is caused by low investments in AH delivery by private sector partly due to the dominance of the public sector Maziwa Zaidi thanks all donors and organizations which globally support the work of ILRI and its partners through their contributions to the CGIAR system Resource requirements (low to high, between 1 and 5) Land Water Labour Cash Access to inputs Knowledge and skills Impact areas (low to high, between 1 and 5) Food security Nutrition and food safety Youth empowerment Women empowerment Livelihoods Market access and linkages Outcome difficulty (low to high, between 1 and 5) Business profitability Environmental sustainability Youth empowerment Women empowerment X X X X X
Advertisement