Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to New developments in vaccines against African swine fever(20)

Advertisement

More from ILRI(20)

Advertisement

New developments in vaccines against African swine fever

  1. Better lives through livestock New developments in vaccines against African swine fever Lucilla Steinaa Principal Scientist Animal and Human Health Program, ILRI International Veterinary Vaccinology Network Webinar 30 November 2021
  2. 2 Spread of African Swine Fever Virus 1957 1960 2018 2007 2018 2018 Dixon et al., Antiviral Research 2019
  3. 3 African Swine Fever Status (2016-2020)
  4. 4 African Swine Fever in Africa • Large DNA virus, Asfaviridae family • Approximately 160 genes, number depending on isolate. • 2 genotypes present in China, one in Europe. • ASFV present in about 26 African countries. • All 24 genotypes are present in Africa. • There is a wildlife reservoir: warthogs and bush pigs. • Wild boars are susceptible. • Soft ticks of the genus Ornithodores are involved in transmission of ASFV. From “Encyclopedia of Virology” Chap.: African swine fever” by L.Dixon and D. Chapman. 2008
  5. 5 CAM/1/02 CAM/4/85 GHA/1/02 LIS/60 NIG/1/01 ANG/70 IC/2/96 BEN/1/97 SPEC/205 SPEC/209 Mkuzi/79 I MOZ/1/02 MOZ/1/05 LUS1/93 MOZ/2/02 MOZ/1/03 II RSA/5/95 SPEC/257 RSA/3/03 RSA/Warmbaths III MOZ/1979 MAL/1/02 MOZ/1960 Tengani/62 V MOZ/8/94 SPEC265 MOZ/1/94 VI RSA/3/04/ RSA/Warthog RSA/1/99/W IV RSA/2/96 RSA/2/03 RSA/3/96 RSA/1/04 XIX Lillie RSA/1/95 XX XIII RSA/1/03 RSA/4/95 RSA/1/98 SPEC/154 VII XIV NYA/12 TAN/2/03 TAN/1/03 XVI XV TAN/1/01 XIII SUM/14/11 XII MZI/1/92 XI KAB/6/2 MCH/1/89 MCH/3/89 BAN/1/91 DED/1/89 LIL/20/2 DOWA CHJ/1/89 KLI/2/88 PHW/1/88 TMB/1/89 VIII UGA/1/95 KEN/5/01 IX BUR/1/84 BUR/1/90 Kenya/50 X 100 79 74 57 91 0.005 Neighbor-Joining tree depicting the p72 gene relationships and geographical distribution of the major ASFV genotypes p72 gene Contribution: Livio Heath (ARC-OVI) Genotype I Genotype II,III, IV, V, VI, VII, XIX, XX, XIII Genotype IX, X Genotype VIII, XI, XII, XIII, XV, XVI, XIV
  6. TOWARDS A LIVE ATTENUATED VACCINE FOR AFRICAN SWINE FEVER
  7. 7 Vaccine Candidates
  8. 8 Vaccine Candidates • Efficacy • High level of protection, 100 % in many cases in various doses • Under optimal timing, 4 weeks post immunization • Duration of immunity ? • Safety • Different dose studies for some vaccine candidates. • Very different clinical readout system, some use clinical score systems with many parameters (King 2011 and Galindo-Cardiel 2013), others use single parameters, e.g., fever. • Route of immunization • Initially: intramuscularly • Orally route became interesting because of wild boar • Less viremia using orally route
  9. 9 ILRI ASFV Vaccine Activities • Live vaccine (CRISPR/Cas9 deletions) and synthetic approach • Deletion of genes for attenuation • Testing in established animal model • Subunit vaccine – activities • Screening of antigens • Viral vectors as delivery
  10. 10 Isolated Virus • Kenya 1033 (genotype IX) isolated by ILRI and DVS Kenya. • Genotype IX and X are especially circulation in Eastern Africa. • Isolated from a zone with outbreaks. • Used as the challenging virus in the animal model • Used as backbone for deletion of genes to generate attenuated viruses. Gallardo C et al. A.J. Biotech 2011 Onzere C. et al. Virus Genes 2018
  11. 11 ASFV Kenya 1033 – Virus Batch for Challenge • This virus is very similar to the other genotype IX and X viruses. • Animal model was set up. Different doses were tested. 5 animal per group, intramuscular injection. 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 50 100 Survival - Groups Day after challenge Percent survival 102 103 104 105 0 2 4 6 8 38 40 42 Body temperature - Groups Day after challenge Body temperature 102 103 104 105 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 5 10 15 Clinical score - Groups Day after challenge Clinical score 102 103 104 105 Scoring system: Galindo-Cardiel 2013
  12. 12 Genomic Stability and Production Cell Lines Problems with instability of genomes in cell lines Progress on production cell lines ZMAC – pig macrophage cell line MA-104 cell line (Green monkey kidney epithelial cell line)
  13. 13 Scoring system: King et al. 2011 Virus batch for challenge experiments Virulence of WSL Adapted WT-Virus 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 50 100 Days post infection Probability of Survival 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 5 10 15 20 25 Days post infection Clinical score Challenge with wild type virus. Open circles: WSL cell line grown virus , Solid squares: Macrophage grown virus • WSL (from FLI) is a fetal wild boar lung cell line, not immortalized. • ASFV Kenya 1033 was adapted to WSL (20+ passages) • 102 TCID50 was chosen to test if the virus grown in WSL cells was still lethal
  14. 14 Virus batch for challenge experiments Titers of ASFV Ken-1033 in WSL 1.00E+00 1.00E+01 1.00E+02 1.00E+03 1.00E+04 1.00E+05 1.00E+06 1.00E+07 1.00E+08 1.00E+09 1.00E+10 Macrophage grown ASFV - 4 days WSL grown ASFV - 4 days MOI 0.1 MOI 0.25 MOI 1 MOI 2.5 MOI 5
  15. 15 CRISPR-Cas Editing of African Swine Fever Virus ASFV gene RHA LHA LHA RHA GFP in ASF genome Infect with WT-virus Transfection with guide RNA and GFP donor DNA Stable CAS transfected cell line (WSL) Check for GFP insert with PCR over junction Cloning of cells with fluorescent virus ➢ Directly modification on replicating virus inside cells Constructed 7-10 different viruses
  16. 16 Synthetic Construction of African Swine Fever Virus + Virus Genome Validated Parts Modified Parts Isolate genome and rescue virus + ➢ Capacity to efficiently perform genome-wide changes in the virus genome in a combinatorial manner to understand virus biology. ➢ Capacity to produce clinically-relevant viruses without extensive passaging in tissue culture. ➢ Streamlines process to generate various designer vaccine candidates and oncolytic viruses.
  17. 17 First Viruses: Experimental Setup Day -21 0 31 51 Quarantine Clinical scoring Clinical scoring Immunisation (1 injection) Challenge 104 ASF1033_∆CD2v (9x) 102 ASF1033 (8x) 104 ASF1033_∆CD2v∆A238L (9x) 102 ASF1033 (8x) PBS (9x) 102 ASF1033 (8x) CD2v Immunomodulatory molecule promoting apoptosis of lymphocytes. A238L Mimic NFκB subunit, inhibits NFκB activity, which is crucial in the pro-inflammatory response.
  18. 18 Clinical Scores After Immunization 0 10 20 30 0 5 10 15 20 ASF1033_CD2v DPI Clincal sore 0 10 20 30 0 5 10 15 20 ASF1033_CD2vA238L DPI Clinical score 0 10 20 30 0 5 10 15 20 PBS DPI Clincal score 0 10 20 30 0 5 10 15 Post-immunisation DPI Clinical score ASF1033_CD2v ASF1033_CD2vA238L PBS 1 2 3 4 -2.5 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 Weight gain Week Kg ASF1033_CD2v ASF1033_CD2vA238L PBS ASF1033_∆CD2v ASF1033_∆CD2v∆A238L PBS
  19. 19 Clinical Scores After Challenge 0 7 14 21 0 5 10 15 20 ASF1033_CD2v DPC Clincal score 0 7 14 21 0 5 10 15 20 ASF1033_CD2vA238L DPC Clinical score 0 7 14 21 0 5 10 15 20 PBS DPC Clinical score 0 7 14 21 0 5 10 15 20 Clinical scores Challenge DPC Clincal score ASF1033_CD2v ASF1033_CD2vA238L PBS 0 7 14 21 0 5 10 15 20 Challenge DPC Clinical score ASF1033_CD2v ASF1033_CD2vA238L PBS ASF1033_∆CD2v ASF1033_∆CD2v∆A238L PBS
  20. 20 Survival Plot 0 7 14 21 0 50 100 Survival proportions DPC Probability of Survival ASF1033_CD2v ASF1033_CD2vA238L PBS medium WT medium WT medium WT 0 200 400 600 800 1000 SFU/ million cells ASF1033_CD2v ASF1033_CD2vA238L PBS IFNγ-ELISpot D28
  21. 21 • ∆CD2v is more efficient than the double knockout but less attenuated. 87.5% protection versus 50%. • ∆A238L seems to add to the attenuation, but with a loss in ability to protect. Conclusion 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 0 5 10 15 20 25 Clinical score DPI ΔA238L-only Controls
  22. 22 Second viruses: Experimental Setup Day -21 0 31 51 Quarantine Clinical scoring Clinical scoring Immunisation (1 injection) Challenge 103 ASF1033_∆X (7x) 102 ASF1033 _∆X (6x) 103 ASF1033_∆Y (7x) 102 ASF1033 _∆Y (6x) PBS (7x) 102 ASF1033 (6x) 28
  23. 23 New Gene-Deleted Viruses G ro u p 1 C lin ic a l s c o r e ( a v e r a g e ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 5 10 15 20 25 Remaining data: Viremia data Antibody titers PM data G r o u p 2 C lin ic a l s c o r e ( a v ) 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 A ll g ro u p s D a y s p o s t in fe c tio n C lin ic a l s c o r e s (m e a n ) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 8 3 9 4 0 4 1 4 2 4 3 4 4 0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 Group1 Group2 Group3 E lis p o t D 2 8 _ 2 x 1 0 ^ 5 S F U /1 0 ^ 6 P B M C M E D I A A S F V W T M O I _ 0 . 1 C o n _ A -2 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 G ro u p 1 G ro u p 2 G ro u p 3 Challenge Immunization Immunization Challenge Immunization Challenge Days post infection Days post infection IFNγ-ELISpot D28
  24. 24 ILRI Hussein Abkallo Hanneke Hemmink Nicholas Svitek Jeremiah Khayumba Anna Lacasta Elias Awino Rosemary Saya Bernard Odour Emanuel Khazalwa Lucilla Steinaa Collaborators Sanjay Vashee, J. Craig Venter Institute Walter Fuchs, Friedrich Loeffler Institute Acknowledgements ∆CD2v virus / WT-virus Friedrich Loeffler Institute Gunther Keil Raquel Portugal Sandra Blome ILRI Richard Bishop, now WSU Edward Okoth
  25. THANK YOU
Advertisement