Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(19)

Similar to Learning from multistakeholder processes on catalysing pro-poor smallholder dairy value chain development in Tanzania(20)

Advertisement

More from ILRI(20)

Advertisement

Learning from multistakeholder processes on catalysing pro-poor smallholder dairy value chain development in Tanzania

  1. Learning from multistakeholder processes on catalysing pro-poor smallholder dairy value chain development in Tanzania Catherine Kilelu Maziwa Zaidi Review and Planning 23-25 Sept 2015 Oceanic Bay Hotel & Resort, Bagamoyo
  2. Introduction  Dairy development in Tanzania -opportunities for growth in the sector that include vast majority of (poor) cattle keepers ● increasing demand for, and consumption of dairy products ● Current low per capita milk availability  Pro-poor dairy development- means focusing attention on ‘growing’ the existing informal system of milk production and marketing Objective: Develop scalable VC approaches for marginalized communities in Tanzania 2
  3. Integrating MSPs in pro-poor dairy value chain development  Why MSPs-co-creating solutions and better leverage opportunities for pro-poor innovation and value chain development ● Joint diagnosing problems, identifying opportunities and joint action/ learning, knowledge sharing/ partnerships and business development  MSP approaches used (MilkIT and MoreMilk) ● Innovation platforms - space for multi-actor interactions, learning and change (focus-feeds- VC) ● Dairy Market Hub model- catalysing market-led VC interactions +coordination to enhance inputs/services and output market access (hub as business platforms) 3
  4. Conceptual/analytical framework 4 MSPs (IP and Hubs) Interventions (Action Areas) System capacity to innovate -identity problems/opportunities -Experiment/intervene with options and assessing -Mobilize resources/coalitions -Collaboration & coordination Value chain transformation (upgrading) - Horizontal upgrading - Vertical - Process Improved incomes, livehood,
  5. Research focus and approach  How do the MSP approaches contribute to smallholder innovation & dairy value chain development in Tanzania?  Revisited 6 sites in Lushoto and Handeni (3 per district) 5 District Sites Farmers FDGs Agro- inputs dealers AISPs Milk traders Extension Handeni Kibaya (IP/Hub) Sindeni (IP/Hub) Kwediyamba (Hub) 17 (8M 9F) 19 ( 9M,10F) 20 (10M, 10F) 3 3 DLO (AISPs) 2 Milk Traders 1 Milk collection centre (Tanga Fresh) 2 Village/ Ward extension Lushoto Mbuuzi (IP/Hub) Ubiri (IP/Hub) Wena (Hub) 20 (11F 9M) 25 (13 M 12 F) 21 ( 14 F 7 W) 2 2 DLO (AISPs) 1 Private AISP 2 Milk Traders 2 Milk collection centres ( UWALU and Bumbuli) 3 Village/ Ward extension -Project document reviews -DDF Meetings
  6. Results 6  Summary of findings (preliminary analysis)
  7. How the MSP contribute to pro-poor value chain development (Emerging changes)  Farmers training/demos (IPs) - multi-actor collaboration ● Training-increase/ appreciation of new knowledge resulting in changing practices e.g. animal husbandry, more milk (Lushoto), milk handling  Linkages being formed ● Farmer groups formed/strengthened and formalized (horizontal)(95%-325% membership increase) ● Farmers linking with VC actors (vertical linkages)- stimulating demand/supply of inputs & services (hub approach) 7
  8. Limitations of the MSPs in pro-poor value chain development  Training necessary but not sufficient: ● Farmers prefer practical learning e.g. demos/visits with added support (extension) but this process not sustained-This enables more farmers trying out new forages (IP sites) ● Low uptake of promoted innovations e.g. feeds, AI (lack of seeds, drought/water shortage, socio-cultural barriers, land access)  Beyond forming linkages to making them work ● Farmer groups- Most committees are not working, participation (capacity?) ● Input/services- use limited-despite formal contracts (price, not aware of contract details, quality of service), ● Milk marketing- low and no collective marketing 8
  9. MSPs and above farm level issues  Above farm-level institutional issues ● Low milk price ● Breeding (AI- semen quality, improved heifer liquid nitrogen), ● Land & H20 conflict ● Access to quality forage seeds ● Regulations around input access (drugs)- Who, where, packaging  Is the national level MSP (DDF) catalysing /advancing this agenda? Progress with taskforces not clear 9
  10. Concluding reflections  How do we adapt MSP to stimulate change? ● Linking planned action and interventions to the process of change (Pathway to change) ● MSPs & re-orienting the dynamics of the value chain (system) toward realizing the desired outcomes- ● How do we monitor/capture the change processes and learn collectively? (Feedback)  Research & development- How do they interact to stimulate innovation and VC transformation 10
  11. ASANTENI 11
Advertisement