Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Loading in …3
×
1 of 12

Liberia: what does the Paris Agreement's transparency framework mean for the LDCs?

0

Share

Download to read offline

A presentation by Charles Asumana on Libera's experience of reporting on their experiences implementing the Paris Agreement.

Charles Asumana is the national project coordinator of Liberia’s First Biennial Update Report (BUR-1) project. He is responsible for overseeing the project's implementation, including the provision of technical assistance to the national technical expert groups, under UNEP supervision. He is also a technical expert reviewer to the UNFCCC.

The presentation was delivered on Tuesday, 4 August 2020 during the webinar hosted by IIED `What does the Paris Agreement’s transparency framework mean for LDCs?´.

More details: https://www.iied.org/what-does-paris-agreements-transparency-framework-mean-for-ldcs

More Related Content

You Might Also Like

Related Books

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

Related Audiobooks

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

Liberia: what does the Paris Agreement's transparency framework mean for the LDCs?

  1. 1. WEBINAR: What Does The Paris Agreement’s Transparency Framework Mean for the Least Developed Countries? Charles Asumana Sr., PhD. LIBERIA August 4, 2020
  2. 2. Outline 1) National Reporting Experience under the UNFCCC 2) Current Status of NC/BUR 3) National Motivations for Preparing NC/BUR 4) Challenges and Outcomes 5) Lessons Learned
  3. 3. National Reporting Experience The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Liberia, established by an Act of the National Legislature, is designated as the national entity for, among other things, the preparation and submission of international reporting documents, such as the NCs and BURs. As the “single national entity”, the EPA collaborates with the inventory stakeholders to enable the country meets its reporting obligations.
  4. 4. Structure for Climate Change Governance
  5. 5. KEY EMISSION SECTORS CONCERNED INSTITUTIONS ENERGY Ministry of Mines & Energy, Ministry of Transport, Liberia Electricity Corporation, Rural Renewable Energy Agency, Liberia Petroleum Refining Company, Liberia Civil Aviation Authority IPPU Ministry of Commerce, Firestone Rubber Plantation Company, International Aluminum Factory, NICOM Distillery, LIPFOCO Foam Mattress, National Paint Industry, Mining Industries, etc. WASTE City Corporations, Liberia Water & Sewer Corporation, Ministry of Health AGRICULTURE Ministry of Agriculture, Central Agriculture Training Institute , Liberia Agro International Corporation FORESTRY & OTHER LAND USE (FOLU) Forestry Development Authority, Liberia Land Authority ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA) OF LIBERIA
  6. 6. Current Status of NC/BUR In Liberia, the preparation of the SNC and BUR–1 is ongoing and the final documents are expected to be published before the end of this year - 2020. The inventory is taking into account four main gases, namely: Carbon dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4), Nitrous oxide (N2O), and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). The methodology is based on the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National GHG Inventories, without country-specific emission factors (Tier 1).
  7. 7. National Motivations for Preparing NC/BUR Liberia is highly vulnerable owing to its low economic base, dependence on rain-fed agriculture, increasing coastal erosion, exposure to epidemics and huge reliance on biomass energy, plus low capacity to adapt at the community and national levels. In the first NC, Liberia’s contributions to global GHG emissions stand at 1.89 mt CO2 eq., representing 0% of the global total.
  8. 8. Flood Damage
  9. 9. Issues of trust and use of information hinder the gathering of relevant data from Inventory stakeholders Difficulty in obtaining activity data due to its unavailability. In some cases, available data vary in formats, not in the format required for GHG Inventory  Difficulty in accessing information due to less robust institutional arrangement and/or the absence of legal, formal and procedural mandate The rate of staff turnover is high, as is the number of fresh members with no previous knowledge for effective coordination Challenges and Outcomes
  10. 10. Lessons Learned Stakeholders’ engagement and consultation is important to foster confidence and assurance that data and information will not be used against them, but rather for scientific purposes, national policy and international reporting. Strengthen institutional and human resource capacity through capacity building approaches, training programs and refreshers. Gap analysis can be conducted to identify capacity and training needs. In the absence of a legal, formal, and procedural mandate, inventory stakeholders do not feel obligated to supply data and information. An MOU is necessary, along with a robust institutional arrangement for effective coordination.
  11. 11. Conclusion At the moment, Liberia is not adequately prepared for the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF) of the Paris Agreement. With the necessary support to enhance capacities at the systemic, institutional and individual levels, Liberia will be in a better position to implement the transparency elements in the Agreement.
  12. 12. Thanks for your attention

×