Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Upcoming SlideShare
IkeGPS Grease Trap Study
IkeGPS Grease Trap Study
Loading in …3
×
1 of 29

Building capacity for pro-poor responses to wildlife crime in Uganda: online offenders' database

1

Share

Download to read offline

This presentation was prepared by Geoffrey Mwedde, projects manager, Uganda Country Programme, Wildlife Conservation Society. It provides more information on the wildlife crime offenders’ database.

The presentation was prepared for the final workshop of the project on ‘Building capacity for pro-poor responses to wildlife crime in Uganda’. This took place in Kampala in the first week of April 2017. The project was funded by the UK Government’s Illegal Wildlife Trade Challenge Fund from April 2014 to March 2017. It aimed to:

• Understand the current state of wildlife crime in Uganda, and investigate the underlying drivers of this crime
• Investigate the preferences of local people and conservation staff for different types of interventions aimed at addressing wildlife crime, and assess the likely impact of
• These interventions on local people’s attitudes and behaviour, and
• Develop new or improved approaches to increase the capacity of the Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) to tackle wildlife crime more efficiently and effectively.

More information: https://www.iied.org/building-capacity-for-pro-poor-responses-wildlife-crime-uganda

More Related Content

You Might Also Like

Related Books

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

Related Audiobooks

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

Building capacity for pro-poor responses to wildlife crime in Uganda: online offenders' database

  1. 1. Online Offender’s Database Structure and Analyses By Geoffrey Mwedde (WCS) at the Tackling Wildlife Crime Differently Workshop Held 5th April 2017 at Protea Hotel Kampala
  2. 2. Outline • Background • Overview of the offenders’ database • Why the online offenders’ database? • Sample analyses
  3. 3. UWA’s law enforcement budget • Between 45-95% of UWA’s budget is invested in law enforcement at any site they manage. • Need to measure effectiveness of this expenditure and look at ways it can be improved • Tools developed to capture data to enable this to happen
  4. 4. MIST and SMART • UWA developed MIST in 1998 • Tested and updated in Murchison Falls National Park • WCS helped UWA roll it out to all PAs from 2001 • Taken around World • SMART partnership developed to update MIST and provide more analysis capabilities • www.smartconservationsoftwa
  5. 5. Changing patrol coverage Kibale National Park, Uganda LEM was implemented in Kibale National Park in 2004 and as patrol coverage maps were produced wardens started to orient patrols to areas that had been rarely patrolled if at all. 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2013
  6. 6. Limits to MIST/SMART data • Tools captured data from Patrols including arrests – can map arrest locations and summarise basic data on arrests • However, did not track suspects well nor what happened to them in the courts – Often treated as first time offenders because no record of previous arrests
  7. 7. Fingerprint option
  8. 8. Why an online database? • Increasing need for Intelligence information to tackle wildlife crime and trafficking • Intelligence tools like I2 and Sentinel are useless without data • Need data in real time and ability to update regularly
  9. 9. Important intelligence data • Telephone number of suspect – Can link to records of calls made by others – Can check address where registered • Village location and parish (ideally with GPS location in case follow up needed) – Can check hotspots of people involved in wildlife crime • Associates – Who works together – partners may provide links to middlemen
  10. 10. Law enforcement and court cases – Able to track repeat offenders and retrieve records for court – Able to track and document of court cases and verdict – Map hotspots – A GIS (ESRI) Analysis has been incorporated commercial hunting – MFNP & QENP
  11. 11. Structure of offenders’ database • Three main tables: – Suspects – Arrests – Court cases • Two analysis options – Summary queries – automatic and results produced on screen and as .csv file – Export data and analyse independently
  12. 12. Getting the online database to work • Needs leadership from Protected Area Authority Headquarters – someone needs to push to make sure all sites collect and enter data • While fairly simple to use there is a need to train in its use as staff move on and are replaced • Need a dedicated computer – part of problem with slow take up in UWA • Internet connection can be frustrating in Africa – dongles are a good alternative and cost $10/month to top up with data
  13. 13. Data sheets for offline data storage • Created data sheets for Suspects, arrests and court cases • Allows data to be collected if in a rush and then entered later • Also ensures paper record which can be signed by suspect which may be useful for future prosecutions
  14. 14. Offline data entry package developed
  15. 15. Types of analyses that can be made with offenders’ database data • Summary queries by Protected Area between specific dates: – Numbers of arrests and number of offenders – Number of first, second, third+ time offenders – Summed numbers and weight of evidence impounded – Total fines, prison terms and community service days – Average fine, prison term or community service days for first time or repeat offenders – Number of prosecutions and percentage successful
  16. 16. Arrests over time
  17. 17. Time of day arrests made
  18. 18. Detection of offender
  19. 19. Reasons for arrests
  20. 20. Repeat offender frequency
  21. 21. Verdicts
  22. 22. Percentage of successful prosecutions
  23. 23. Penalties per crime type
  24. 24. Trend in fines
  25. 25. Trends in prison terms
  26. 26. Comparison of Courts
  27. 27. Acknowledgements • Andy Plumptre/Wildlife Conservation Society • Uganda Wildlife Authority • IWT
  28. 28. THANK YOU!

×