Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Cost Approach

1,083 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Cost Approach

  1. 1. FITT (Fostering Interregional Exchange in ICT Technology Transfer)
  2. 2. <ul><li>This case is based on a valuation example </li></ul><ul><li>Valuation method is a trended historical cost-based approach </li></ul><ul><li>Case exposes the various steps needed to be followed in order to succeed such a valuation </li></ul><ul><li>Case is based on a real-world example </li></ul>Case - In brief
  3. 3. Valuation - A question of Time Present Past Future Time Cost Approach Market Approach Income Approach <ul><li>Valuation case hereby developped is based on the cost approach </li></ul>Image source : Microsoft Office 2007 Cliparts
  4. 4. Case exposed Introduction to cost approaches <ul><li>TRENDED HISTORICAL COSTS METHOD </li></ul><ul><ul><li>IDEA : Measure the actual (trended) costs incurred during the creation and development of the IP. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>REPLACEMENT COSTS METHOD </li></ul><ul><ul><li>IDEA : Use an estimation of the costs to obtain an equivalent IP asset with similar use or function (economic utility) as the original IP asset under valuation. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>REPRODUCTION COSTS METHOD </li></ul><ul><ul><li>IDEA : Based on the costs to purchase or create an exact replica of the IP asset subject to valuation. </li></ul></ul>Image source : Microsoft Office 2007 Cliparts
  5. 5. Case exposed (introduction) <ul><li>In this Case, we used the trended historical cost method </li></ul><ul><li>Advantages </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Simple method </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Accounting information was available </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Information was available </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Valuated IP asset was clearly identified </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Team was available </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Answer a simple question : « how much did this invention cost us? » </li></ul></ul>Image source : Microsoft Office 2007 Cliparts
  6. 6. Case exposed <ul><li>6 steps procedure </li></ul>
  7. 7. <ul><li>Description of IP asset under valuation </li></ul><ul><li>Patent familly composed of a set of patents in the healthcare sector </li></ul>Step 1 ~ IP asset description
  8. 8. <ul><li>Information sources </li></ul><ul><li>Accounting balance sheets </li></ul><ul><li>Research reports </li></ul><ul><li>Project follow-up reports </li></ul><ul><li>Direct interviews with all stakeholders </li></ul>Step 2 ~ Identification of information sources Usually the best source of information Image source : Microsoft Office 2007 Cliparts
  9. 9. <ul><li>Used Data includes </li></ul><ul><li>Cost of human resources (scientists, engineers, ...) </li></ul><ul><li>Cost of IP asset protection </li></ul><ul><li>Overhead costs for utilities and research space, for administrative and technical support </li></ul><ul><li>Raw materials used </li></ul><ul><li>Prototype construction and testing expenses </li></ul><ul><li>Outside services for independent evaluation, certifications, patenting procedures </li></ul><ul><li>Pilot plant expenses </li></ul><ul><li>Sector specific administrative costs (i.e. approval procedure phase to commercialize a medical product, official recognition) </li></ul>Step 3 ~ Selection of data
  10. 10. <ul><li>Domains of expenditures are regrouped </li></ul><ul><li>Human resources expenditures: e.g. salaries, </li></ul><ul><li>R&D expenditures: e.g. plant expenses, raw materials (used for the prototype) expenditures, overhead costs, </li></ul><ul><li>Juridical and administrative expenditures: expenditures from outside services mainly for patenting procedures. </li></ul>Step 4 ~ Costs Compilation All expenditures are validated by team (goal is to exclude non valid ones)
  11. 11. <ul><li>Yesterday’s value ≠ Today’s value </li></ul><ul><li>Impact of inflation  Use of Consumption price index </li></ul>Step 5 ~ Cost trend factors application To give an example of calculation, the cost trend factor for 2006 (in 2008 value) is equal to 1.09 = (1+2.7%)x(1+2.3%)x(1+3.4%) Source of data : national statistic offices
  12. 12. <ul><li>Depreciation which should be taken care of </li></ul><ul><li>Physical depreciation: Physical wear and tear of the asset that makes it increasingly unable to perform with the speed, dependability and accuracy of a new counterpart. This type of obsolescence is rarely observed to the IP assets. </li></ul><ul><li>Functional obsolescence: Over time, the IP asset may be less able to realise the specific function for which it was originally developed. </li></ul><ul><li>Technological obsolescence: Often considered as a subset of the functional obsolescence it is linked to a change of the state of art, the development of new technologies that make the technology of the IP asset not useful anymore. </li></ul><ul><li>Economic obsolescence: Economic conditions that reduce consumer demand and yield excess industry capacity. </li></ul>Step 6 ~ Depreciation
  13. 13. <ul><li>Trended historical cost approach is a fairly easy valuation method, mostly based on available data </li></ul><ul><li>Calculation of trend factors and depreciation can be difficult, dependng on the IP under valuation </li></ul><ul><li>Such an approach constitutes an important initial source of information, but depending on the reason for the valuation action, it most oftenly needs to be completed with market and/or income approaches </li></ul>Conclusion

×