Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Prescribing a digital transformation for life sciences: Your cognitive future in the life sciences industry

4,108 views

Published on

The global life sciences industry is undergoing a major transformation. Impacted by widespread industry challenges around healthcare reforms, demand for patient-centric care delivery models and regulatory compliance, life sciences organizations are evolving their business models.

Through this latest study by IBM Institute of Business Value, learn how cognitive computing can help the life sciences industry to bridge the gap between untapped opportunities and current capabilities and how can hidden insights that reside in data – structured and unstructured – be fully harnessed. Cognitive-based systems build knowledge and learn, understand natural language, and reason and interact more naturally with human beings than traditional programmable systems.

Know more on how specifically can life sciences organizations leverage cognitive computing to address issues currently plaguing the industry.

Published in: Healthcare
  • You can ask here for a help. They helped me a lot an i`m highly satisfied with quality of work done. I can promise you 100% un-plagiarized text and good experts there. Use with pleasure! ⇒ www.HelpWriting.net ⇐
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Dating for everyone is here: ❶❶❶ http://bit.ly/39pMlLF ❶❶❶
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Sex in your area is here: ♥♥♥ http://bit.ly/39pMlLF ♥♥♥
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

Prescribing a digital transformation for life sciences: Your cognitive future in the life sciences industry

  1. 1. ©2016 IBM Corporation1 Prescribing a digital transformation Your cognitive future in the life sciences industry
  2. 2. ©2016 IBM Corporation2 Four disruptive forces are forcing life sciences industry to focus on three key areas Emerging ecosystems Need to decide in which ecosystem to play and which role to take whilst putting the patient at the center of any conversations Technology- driven innovation Need to capitalize on new technologies to drive innovation in new ecosystems using a platform- based approach Innovation of R&D Compelling need to reinvent the innovation process by in order to decrease the time and cost of development Value- based pricing Need to demonstrate effectiveness through real- world evidence in order to improve reimbursement and formulary positions DecideDiscover Provide ability to digest vast amounts of research data to identify new innovations using more innovative methods Provide personalized, contextual, evidence-backed recommendations to investigators to match patients with trial sites, etc. Engage Provide better collaboration between pharma companies and stakeholders including patient providers & payers
  3. 3. ©2016 IBM Corporation3 Innovation is the life-blood of the life sciences but is challenged by existing skills and tools that are unable to cope with new data sources Discover of the life sciences CxOs are actively pursuing product and service innovation1 Industry need Achievement gap Insufficient skills Lack of funding for innovation Lack of analytical tools Percentage of life sciences CxOs on what they believe are barriers to implement disruptive innovation2 Key question Source: See slide 9 44% 42% 33% 58%  How can life sciences companies free themselves from constraints of traditional capabilities and foster innovation?
  4. 4. ©2016 IBM Corporation4 Effective decision making is crucial for life sciences CxOs but they lack the confidence in making strategic decisions Decide increase in the cost of developing a drug from 2004-20141 145% Industry need Achievement gap ⅔ of the life sciences CxOs are not confident in taking strategic business decisions2 Source: See slide 9 of the life sciences executives are not confident in evaluating options or taking cost reduction decisions2 454% Key question  How can life sciences companies take effective decisions at right time?
  5. 5. ©2016 IBM Corporation5 Moving to patient centricity is a key requirement for the industry but life science executives struggle to respond of the life sciences CxOs believe that consumers demand a more personalized experience today1 Engage Industry need Source: See slide 9 Note: For the Life Sciences industry, the term “consumer” may include supplier, patient , physician, provider, payer, scientist Percentage of life sciences executives that do not believe their organizations are competent in delivering consumer service2 Achievement gap Self service enabled for the consumers Issue resolved quickly and comprehensively More personalized experience68% 63% 59% 72% Key question  How can life sciences companies deliver better personalized treatments to its patients?
  6. 6. ©2016 IBM Corporation6 One way of answering these questions is through cognitive computing which… DecideDiscover  Helps people recognize patterns, discover insights and make connections  Understands the vast amounts of information available in whatever format it exists  Visualizes possibilities and validates theories like experts  Offers evidence-based recommendations  Evolves continually towards more accuracy based on new information, outcomes, and actions  Provides traceability for audit and compliance why a particular decision is made Engage  Acts as a tireless agent providing expert assistance to human users  Carries a conversation naturally, e.g. in human language  Understands consumers from all that is known about them (e.g. patient records, social tools) and enriches interactions with context- and evidence-based reasoning Source: IBM Institute for Business Value Analysis 2015
  7. 7. ©2016 IBM Corporation7 Life sciences executives believe cognitive computing will play a disruptive role in the industry and plan to invest in this capability soon … of the executives familiar with cognitive computing believe it will play a critical role in their business1 … of executives familiar with cognitive computing believe it will play a disruptive role in the life sciences industry1 96% of the executives familiar with cognitive computing indicated that they are likely to invest in it in future with the majority doing so after 2 years2 87% Source: See slide 9 1-2 yrs 3-4 yrs >=5 yrs 20% 35% 41%
  8. 8. ©2016 IBM Corporation8 To learn how your organization can use cognitive computing to open up opportunities in the life sciences ecosystem, please contact: Heather Fraser Global Life Sciences and Healthcare Lead IBM Institute for Business Value hfraser@uk.ibm.com Sandipan Sarkar Cognitive Computing Leader, IBM Institute for Business Value sandipan.sarkar@in.ibm.com Lauren O'Donnell Global General Manager and VP, Life Sciences IBM Sales & Distribution lhodonne@us.ibm.com Louisa Roberts Associate Partner Watson Health - Life Sciences IBM Watson ljrobert@us.ibm.com Visit our website to read full report on this topic: http://www- 935.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/thoughtleadership/ cognitiveindustry/ Contact study authors
  9. 9. ©2016 IBM Corporation9 Slide 3: Source[1]: IBM Institute for Business Value Cognitive Computing Survey (Q13) 2015, Life Sciences (n=81). Thinking about all of the opportunities available to your organization, to what extent does your organization plan to pursue the following types of innovation? For each type, please rate on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = not at all and 5 = to a great extent. a. Enterprise Model Innovation - Innovate the role your organization plays in the value chain b. Industry Model Innovation - Innovate the industry value chain by moving into new industries, redefining existing industries or creating entirely new ones c. Process & Operations Innovation - Revolutionize business processes d. Product & Service Innovation - Create new or improve existing products and services e. Revenue Model Innovation - Innovate how your organization generates revenue Source[2]: IBM Institute for Business Value Cognitive Computing Survey (Q15) 2015, Life Sciences (n=81). Thinking more about your organization in particular, what barriers to implementing disruptive innovations in your organization do you see? (Select top 6) a. Inadequate funding for innovation b. Insufficient business case/modeling skills to make the case for disruptive innovation c. Insufficient skilled human resources for disruptive innovation d. Customers reservations to new possibilities e. Lack of analytical tools f. Lack of quality/reliable data g. Lack of formal processes in place to manage disruptive innovation h. Insufficient buy-in from senior management i. Organizational complacency j. Overly aggressive ROI expectations for disruptive innovation k. Regulatory constraints l. Risk-aversion of the organization m. Other (please specify) ______ Slide 4: Source[1] : http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2014/11/18/does-it-really-cost-2-6-billion-to-develop-a-new-drug/ Source[2]: IBM Institute for Business Value Cognitive Computing Survey (Q7) 2015, Life Sciences (n=81). How do you rate your organization’s decision making capabilities in the following areas? For each selection, please rate on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = Very weak, 5 = Very strong a. Evaluating options and making cost reduction decisions b. Evaluating options and making day-to-day operational decisions c. Evaluating options and making spending decisions d. Evaluating options and making strategic business decisions e. Having confidence in tactical decisions delegated to first line employees f. Resolving customer related issues and inquiries Slide 5: Source[1]: IBM Institute for Business Value Cognitive Computing Survey (Q6) 2015, Life Sciences (n=81). To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about customer behavior and expectations today?, And what will be your level of agreement in three years ? a. My company’s customers demand (will demand) a more seamless and complete experience. b. My company’s customers demand (will demand) a more personalized experience. c. My company’s customers demand (will demand) immediacy and rapid responsiveness. d. My company’s customers are (will be) more willing to share their personal and business data. e. My company’s customers have (will have) expanded choice sets. f. My company (will) comprehensively anticipate(s) customer preferences. Source[2]: IBM Institute for Business Value Cognitive Computing Survey (Q4) 2015, Life Sciences (n=81). (How competent is your organization in delivering excellent service in the following areas? Please rate on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = Very incompetent challenge, 5 = Very competent. a. Addressing customer/citizen concerns with speed and comprehensiveness b. Creating a consistent customer/citizen experience across channels c. Creating a personalized customer/citizen experience across all interactions d. Enabling customer self service e. Fostering strong customer loyalty f. Maintaining desired rates of customer retention g. Maintaining high quality of service Slide 7: Source [1] : IBM Institute for Business Value Cognitive Computing Survey (Q22) 2015, Life sciences (n=71) - Please indicate to what extent you agree with the following statements? For each statement, please rate on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = strongly disagree, 5 =strongly agree. a. Cognitive computing is a mature and market-ready capability b. Cognitive computing will play a disruptive role in our industry in the next three to five years c. Cognitive computing will play a critical role in the future of our business d. Cognitive computing is a widely-used term to define a particular combination of technologies e. Leaders in our organization are familiar with and understand the benefits of cognitive computing to our business f. Our organization has the expertise in-house to implement a cognitive computing solution Source [2]: IBM Institute for Business Value Cognitive Computing Survey (Q23) 2015, Life Sciences (n=71)- In what time period is your organization most likely to implement a cognitive computing solution? a. 1-2 years b. 3-4 years c. 5 or more years d. Our organization is not likely to implement a cognitive computing solution e. Not sure at the present time Sources

×