Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Safeguards and Co-benefits in NepalPrepared by:   Dil Raj Khanal, FECOFUN               Morten Fauerby Thomsen, CARE Denmark
Major initiatives in Nepal1. Preparation of R-PP through FCPF (World Bank)2. Social & Environmental Strategic Assessment (...
Safeguard mechanisms• The R-PP includes 2 key safeguard mechanisms:   • Social & Environmental Strategic Assessment – SESA...
Design - Readiness             Implementation  Strategic Environmental & Social                 Why: improve design, build...
Design - Readiness                       Implementation               REDD+ Social & Environmental Standards (REDD+ SES)  ...
Equitable benefit sharingPilot project by FECOFUN, ICIMOD and ANSAB• Established methods for monitoring carbon stocks in  ...
Experiences and recommendationsCommunities:• Clarity on land/forest rights is important. In Nepal government  owns the lan...
Experiences and recommendationsCivil society:• Participation of civil society is crucial, both in developing REDD  strateg...
Thank you
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Morten Fauerby Thomsen CARE

397 views

Published on

Presentation from the conference Not Seeing the Forest and People for the Carbon

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Morten Fauerby Thomsen CARE

  1. 1. Safeguards and Co-benefits in NepalPrepared by: Dil Raj Khanal, FECOFUN Morten Fauerby Thomsen, CARE Denmark
  2. 2. Major initiatives in Nepal1. Preparation of R-PP through FCPF (World Bank)2. Social & Environmental Strategic Assessment (SESA)3. Preparation of country specific REDD+ Social & Environmental Standards (REDD+ SES)4. Forming a civil society alliance on REDD+5. Piloting REDD+ activities • Capacity Building • Community based carbon monitoring • Benefit sharing mechanism
  3. 3. Safeguard mechanisms• The R-PP includes 2 key safeguard mechanisms: • Social & Environmental Strategic Assessment – SESA (comp. 2d) • Social & Environmental Standards - REDD+ SES (comp. 4b)• Coordination between the 2 processes is important – but increase complexity
  4. 4. Design - Readiness Implementation Strategic Environmental & Social Why: improve design, build support Assessment (SESA) What: governance, rights,An iterative process of analysis and positive/negative impacts,consultation to improve design Who: multi-stakeholder,No predefined content participatory Environmental & Social Management Framework (ESMF) Framework for development of plans to mitigate and manage risks with respect to World Bank Why: required for funding, improve safeguards design What: WB safeguards, negative impacts, rights Who: government and delivery partner?
  5. 5. Design - Readiness Implementation REDD+ Social & Environmental Standards (REDD+ SES) Inclusive multi-stakeholder process uses comprehensive framework to define country-specific indicators, monitoring plan, review by stakeholders for ongoing monitoring and reporting of process and impactsFacilitation Team Technical Assessment Standards (REDD Working report Committeecell/FECOF Group (from 2013) UN) Why: monitoring & reporting, build stakeholder support, improve design What: governance, rights, positive/negative impacts, adapted to country context Who: multi-stakeholder, participatory identification indicators, assessment, review
  6. 6. Equitable benefit sharingPilot project by FECOFUN, ICIMOD and ANSAB• Established methods for monitoring carbon stocks in community forest• Established an equitable benefit sharing mechanism: • The first years increase in carbon is only weighed 40%, the remaining 60% is calculated based on social criteria such as poverty levels, number of indigenous people (Dalits). • Payment based on plan from forest user groups specifying how they intend to use the funds. • Funds are administered through a Forest Carbon Trust Fund to ensure transparency and participation. • The system is based on national and district level advisory committees, who decides on how much money each watershed and forest user group should receive. • A Watershed REDD Network, consisting of forest user groups, then act as a bridge between district level actors and local forest user groups, and also channel the funding.
  7. 7. Experiences and recommendationsCommunities:• Clarity on land/forest rights is important. In Nepal government owns the land, but the communities own forest resources (or 50/50 in Collaborative systems). Who owns the carbon rights?• Strategy to increase carbon stocks might conflict with local interests in forest products (firewood, construction material). How does this inflict on poor peoples income generation opportunities. How can REDD+ compensate?• Empower communities to make their own management plans that consider the needs of the poor and marginalised (ownership)• Ensure a transparent and equitable benefit sharing with, and also within, indigenous and local communities (avoid elite capture)• Monitoring systems should be kept simple and prioritise local involvement, and reward mechanisms should consider social factors.
  8. 8. Experiences and recommendationsCivil society:• Participation of civil society is crucial, both in developing REDD strategies and safeguards (REDD working group), but also their involvement in implementation• Build capacity of civil society/local communities to actively engage in REDD+ strategy development processes (REDD+ alliance in Nepal), and ensure wide consultation processes.
  9. 9. Thank you

×