LESSONS LEARNT AND NEW    CHALLENGES FORQUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE   ASIA-PACIFIC REGION     CONCEPCION V. PIJANO           ...
The Asia Pacific Quality Network              (APQN)Founded in Hong Kong in January 2003.Incorporated as an association in...
Russia                   Bhutan                               .Brunei    .   MaldivesMembership:   57 members and   6 obse...
Mission     To enhance the quality of higher education in Asia and the Pacific region through strengthening the work of qu...
Objectives Promote good practice in the maintenance and improvement of quality in higher education in the Asia-Pacific reg...
Develop links between quality assuranceagencies and acceptance of each others’decisions and judgments.Assist members deter...
Development Grant Facility   In 2004, APQN became the first networkto receive a 3-year World Bank DevelopmentGrant Facilit...
Activities supported by the DGF grant:Workshops and conferences to build qualityassurance capacity in developingcountries/...
Project groups and regional informationclearinghouse.Liaison with other regional organizationsworking on quality assurance.
Highlights of the Evaluation Review of the                     APQN DGF funding and in‐kind contributions from individuals...
APQN has well defined procedures and organizational administrative framework and has succeeded in delivering programs and ...
Impact Most impact has occurred:  in improving QA mechanisms across  national systems in various countries,  in the exchan...
Countries where workshops, conferences and     training programs were conducted      Australia          Malaysia     Bangl...
Extent to which APQN activities have contributed              to capacity building           7%      7%                   ...
Lessons learnt:A regional approach is an efficient andcost effective mechanism to delivercapacity building across a wide a...
The regional model serves to develophigher education QA systems morequickly and efficiently.The subject of educational qua...
Global Initiative for Quality  Assurance Capacity (GIQAC)a partnership between World Bank andUNESCO to support capacity bu...
Purposes of GIQACTo serve as a worldwide vehicle to build capacity for quality assurance in developing countries and count...
Approved GIQAC Projects APQN Website: Expansion/Maintenance and Database DevelopmentInternship and Cross‐regional Staff Ex...
New ChallengesCreating a strong sense of ownership among its members Becoming a sustainable network valued by all stakehol...
Training external reviewers in developing countries to undertake QA exercises in their home countries 
Utrecht  sb- concepcion pijano
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Utrecht sb- concepcion pijano

373 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
373
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Utrecht sb- concepcion pijano

  1. 1. LESSONS LEARNT AND NEW CHALLENGES FORQUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION CONCEPCION V. PIJANO President Asia-Pacific Quality Network
  2. 2. The Asia Pacific Quality Network (APQN)Founded in Hong Kong in January 2003.Incorporated as an association in December 2004 in the State of Victoria, Australia.Secretariat is hosted by the Australian Universities Quality Agency.
  3. 3. Russia Bhutan .Brunei . MaldivesMembership:  57 members and  6 observers from  27 countries  
  4. 4. Mission To enhance the quality of higher education in Asia and the Pacific region through strengthening the work of quality assurance agencies and extending the cooperation between them.
  5. 5. Objectives Promote good practice in the maintenance and improvement of quality in higher education in the Asia-Pacific region. Provide advice and expertise to assist in the development of new quality assurance agencies in the region.
  6. 6. Develop links between quality assuranceagencies and acceptance of each others’decisions and judgments.Assist members determine standards ofinstitutions operating across nationalborders.Facilitate recognition of qualificationsthroughout the region.Enhance mobility of students betweeninstitutions and member nations.
  7. 7. Development Grant Facility In 2004, APQN became the first networkto receive a 3-year World Bank DevelopmentGrant Facility (DGF) to strengthen itsinstitutional capacity and the technicalcapacity of its member organizations.
  8. 8. Activities supported by the DGF grant:Workshops and conferences to build qualityassurance capacity in developingcountries/territories.Consultancies and external reviewerservices to quality assurance agencies indeveloping countries/territories.Regional staff exchanges and secondmentsfor capacity building.
  9. 9. Project groups and regional informationclearinghouse.Liaison with other regional organizationsworking on quality assurance.
  10. 10. Highlights of the Evaluation Review of the  APQN DGF funding and in‐kind contributions from individuals and member agencies have enabled APQN to target the establishment of QA agencies in many countries. It has strengthened practices that support the enhancement, reform and renewal of emerging and developed QA assurance systems.
  11. 11. APQN has well defined procedures and organizational administrative framework and has succeeded in delivering programs and other activities to build QA capacity within the region.It has created a critical mass of resources, networks and expertise to ensure that the benefits of the Network are maintained.
  12. 12. Impact Most impact has occurred: in improving QA mechanisms across national systems in various countries, in the exchange of ideas and of expertise, in enhanced institutional capabilities, and in promoting communication and cooperation between agencies and institutions.
  13. 13. Countries where workshops, conferences and  training programs were conducted  Australia Malaysia Bangladesh Mongolia China New Zealand Fiji Pakistan India Philippines Japan Vietnam Lao PDR
  14. 14. Extent to which APQN activities have contributed to capacity building 7% 7% 41% Strongly Agree Agree 45% Neither Agree or Disagree Not Applicable
  15. 15. Lessons learnt:A regional approach is an efficient andcost effective mechanism to delivercapacity building across a wide anddiverse region.The regional approach has led to greatercapacity to learn and share.
  16. 16. The regional model serves to develophigher education QA systems morequickly and efficiently.The subject of educational quality isglobal, but the work of QA, for the mostpart, is local.International cooperation and commitmenttowards building capacity in QA asdemonstrated by the World Bank andUNESCO are yielding positive results.
  17. 17. Global Initiative for Quality Assurance Capacity (GIQAC)a partnership between World Bank andUNESCO to support capacity building inquality assurance of higher education indeveloping countries and countries intransition.
  18. 18. Purposes of GIQACTo serve as a worldwide vehicle to build capacity for quality assurance in developing countries and countries in transitionTo support regional training and knowledge‐sharing activities and engender a coherent global programme of activitiesTo assist emerging quality assurance systems in building capacity by sharing information on good practices from around the world, facilitating communication and supporting the production of analyses and guidelines.
  19. 19. Approved GIQAC Projects APQN Website: Expansion/Maintenance and Database DevelopmentInternship and Cross‐regional Staff Exchange ProgrammeTraining Materials and Resource PackageChinese Translation Project
  20. 20. New ChallengesCreating a strong sense of ownership among its members Becoming a sustainable network valued by all stakeholdersDeveloping other internet‐based knowledge sharing and capacity building tools for QA
  21. 21. Training external reviewers in developing countries to undertake QA exercises in their home countries 

×