Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Francesc xavier grau


Published on


  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Francesc xavier grau

  1. 1. 6th Global Meeting of Associations, 6 – 8 May 2015, Montreal Francesc Xavier Grau Non-executive director of GUNi
  2. 2. GUNi: 209 members in 78 countries Higher Education Institutions. Research Centres in HE. HEI Networks. UNESCO Chairs dealing with HE issues UNITWIN centres/networks 2006 2007 2008 2009 2011 2013 GUNi HEIW Reports
  3. 3. Main Project 2015-16 Analyse the dual responsibilities of universities at local and global scale Identify best practices and provide recommendations to both the academic community and public officials on how universities can improve and make compatible cultural, social and economic impact at local and global levels, and Explore the potential conflict, or intrinsic difficulties, in addressing both local demands of society based on the race for global competitiveness and local and global demands to contribute to a more equitable and sustainable society (at local and global scales).
  4. 4. International experts working group UNESCO Chairs  UNITWIN network (create synergies between UNESCO Chairs devoted to Higher Education) City-University working group (direct responsibilities of cities on citizens, confronted with all cultural, social and economic issues that need the attention of universities) Catalan working group  laboratory to test different possibilities of measuring and monitoring impact and engagement
  5. 5. » Emergence of new terms Install in vocabulary. “Social Innovation” one of those terms » Still refining the definition. Anyway, it is a concept that refers to the search of innovative solutions for the complex problems and challenges of the society. These solutions often correspond to new forms of communication and cooperation, so that exercising social innovation implies trespassing both organisational and disciplinary borders, as well as individual, collective, public and private. » Social innovation seeks to respond to unfulfilled social demands and it is focused on both the development of actions and on obtaining results. Social innovation thereby becomes a key factor to ensure social cohesion.
  6. 6. » “After two decades of energetic reform to improve technology transfer universities are only just beginning to think about how to achieve equivalent results in the social field, through the employment of heads of social innovation and social transfer, running social laboratories or incubators to connect users and innovators, or setting up ‘social science parks’.”(Mulgan, G. 2007. Social Innovation: What it is, Why it matters and How it can be accelerated. Oxford: Said Business School) » Universities ( “inescapable social forces for the good” Father Ellacuría), can be involved at all levels of a national/regional social innovation strategy: actors, facilitators, leaders, research, … The role of the University in social innovation: directly related to social responsibilities; affects two main missions: teaching and research. » In order to achieve dynamic and efficient ‘social innovation’ it is necessary to promote their values within the educational system, also at the highest level.
  7. 7. » Universities do not have impact alone, especially on social issues. Adaptive problems  need for collective impact approaches (Kania & Kramer, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2011): (1) a common agenda, (2) shared measurement systems, (3) mutually reinforcing activities, (4) continuous communication and (5) backbone support organizations (universities and networks can also play this role) » Effective Networking: Regional/Local partnerships. Local nature of social innovation. Global social problems require global-scale solutions  Social innovation allows adapting local solutions to global contexts. » Moreover, at national/regional scale universities configure a system: SYSTEMNESS  Impact of systems of universities.
  8. 8. » Need for facing long standing and new social challenges, more efficiently. Need for a reliable reference to the building of arguments and decision making. » A priority on the macro (national) level. But also at the micro (organisational) level. Social innovation metrics at the macro level and social impact measurement systems jointly contribute to enhance the understanding of social value creation that is central to the viability of contemporary and future societies (Tepsie) » Building a system of indicators  concept becomes more precise & recognisable  consolidation. Indicators = measurement instruments  instruments for evaluation and improvement » Universities used to measure impact of “easy“ measurable things: impact of research through bibliometric measures, economic impact through input-output tables… What about social impact? And, again, systems of universities work at the macro and micro levels.
  9. 9. » In contrast with technological innovation, metrics in social innovation cannot be so easily based on outputs. More attention to enabling conditions and social innovation potential. » Drafting indicators of social innovation is not an evident task: (1) no theoretical approach or explicative models, from which variables and indicators could be derived that permit the estimation of causal relationships. (2) no statistical set of data available  no robust or reliable indicators (3) comparative studies among different regions could be made  would allow for establishment of indicators (unfortunately, this type of analysis has yet to be done) » development of indicators of social innovation = still an experimental task » requires: adjusting approaches and concepts, serial measurements (annual or biannual), comparative studies with other nations/regions and case studies to consolidate a system of national/regional indicators of social innovation.
  10. 10. Catalonia’s population (M7.5) is similar to Denmark, Bulgaria or Austria. The Catalan GDP per capita is above the European average (EU-28). • Catalan GDP accounts 20% of Spanish GDP. • Catalan exports represent 26 % of all Spanish exports. • Catalan population is 16% of Spanish total population. • Economic crisis has hit very hard. (unemployment rate: over 20% in Cat, over 23% in Spain) Institution Students University of Barcelona 56.567 Autonomous University of Barcelona 34.244 Technical University of Catalonia 33.894 Pompeu Fabra University 17.204 University of Girona 15.056 University of Lleida 10.074 Rovira i Virgili University 14.037 Open University of Catalona 43.362 224.438
  11. 11. • Catalonia has a diverse system of universities, a diverse society, a representative dimension of local-global • ACUP: sense of systemness. Tradition of measuring collective impact (Research & Technological Innovation). • Individual universities, experience in measuring impact on society. • Opportunity to measure collective social impact of a university system » Create a benchmarking laboratory, as a coordinated space of the eight ACUP universities, to discuss, analyse and test different possibilities of measuring and monitoring impact and engagement OF A UNIVERSITY SYSTEM, both at local and global levels  GUNi HEIW6.
  12. 12. Work Package 2: Measuring Social Innovation Focus on measuring social innovation at the macro level: in what kinds of sectors and organisations does it occur and what tools can we use to measure social innovation?
  13. 13. A Blueprint for social innovation metrics A Scoreboard. Not a single index (complexity of social innovation). Two groups of data 1) Innovation measurement in private/public organisations 2) Social, normative, environmental dimensions Complemented by “innovative” data sources (ex. Google trends)
  14. 14. Universities (can be) involved in more that 50% of these indicators and/or metrics. Recommendations: 1) Put the indicator system into action 2) Identify patterns of national innovation systems 3) Develop indicators at regional level 4) Improve statistics 5) Engage. Multiple actors to contribute
  15. 15. » Implementing a Scottish Social Innovation Strategy (2014-2020). Summary of recommendations: » Raise awareness about social innovation beyond the usual suspects » Formulate (with stakeholders and citizens) a Scottish social innovation strategy. » Implement a smart specialisation strategy encompassing social innovation » Support the development of social innovation networks and platforms to enable greater focus and co-ordination of socially innovative activities in Scotland. » Support the expansion of the incubation of social innovation to provide opportunities for 'bottom-up' solutions, and sustainable job creation. » Plan and implement the creation of a dedicated social innovation cluster/park in Scotland. UNIVERSITIES involved at all levels
  16. 16. + Previous experience of our universities in measuring social impact Tepsie Metrics related to Universities RESINDEX Metrix related to Universities University expenditure on innovation activities Proportion of personnel dedicated to innovation (tech&social) Number of Start-ups. Early-stage Social Entrepreneurship Activities for exchanging ideas, knowledge and relevant information in SI Enterprise death rate Association with external agents in SI Equal opportunities / inequalities regarding disabled people Number of projects in innovation (tech&social) Equal opportunities / inequalities regarding women / men Individuals or units devoted to identify needs / social demands Share of students coming from migration Diversity of cooperating partners Percentage of people 25-64 with tertiary studies Diversity of financing sources University expenditure in social activities Dissemination of social projects outcomes Demands from society to universities Diversity of sectors impacted Participation of universities in organisations / networks related to environment, ecology, ... Degree of participation of the target population in the project .... ...
  17. 17. » Social innovation = key factor to achieve the social cohesion, the competitiveness &the sustainability of our societies. More cohesive societies  more competitive & sustainable societies. » Social innovation provides new solutions to social problems that are especially complex. Global problems that find local solutions. Local solutions that can be transferred to other contexts and therefore, to other societies ("Innovation by adoption"). » Social innovation brings together different agents to search for solutions  collaboration between people & organisations  encourages cooperation and hybridization between sectors. » Social innovation generates results (products, processes, services)  value  must be made visible in order for the society to realise how important it is  results that have to be measured. » Universities involved in: Research, Culture dissemination, Incubation, networking, and as an actor.
  18. 18. Thanks for your attention!