Maputo pres turmaine


Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Maputo pres turmaine

  1. 1. Higher Education and Education for All: The Case of Two Solitudes? IAU Experts’ Seminar 25-26 January 2007 Maputo, Mozambique
  2. 2. Reasons for IAU’s involvement• Importance of EFA globally and to UNESCO• IAU’s commitment to holistic view of education and intra-sectoral inter-dependence• Concern of IAU’s membership• Lack of knowledge about intersections• Relatively low level of involvement by HEIs in EFA
  3. 3. Justification of the TORs• Feasibility (pilot project; scope limitation)• Interest to all our membership (inter-universities; worldwide)• The data should be easily available (North-South)• In harmony with our values (partnerships)
  4. 4. Partners• Financial partner: – SIDA (Swedish International Development Agency)• Collaborating partners – For the Expert’s Seminar • EMU; UNESCO Harare; WGHE; AAU – For the pilot project • UNESCO Harare; WGHE; AAU; AUF; AUCC; NUFFIC
  5. 5. Methodology Aspects• Three phases – Data collection – Meeting – Networking and advocacy• Two targets/Two questionnaires – Development agencies/associations (22 contacted/13 responded) – Institutions (88 contacted/33 responded)
  6. 6. Total Number of Responses (Agencies) 5%36% 59% Questionnaire not completed Questionnaire completed No answer
  7. 7. % of Projects Linked to EFA (Agencies)76543210 1 < 10% 10-20% 25-50% 50-75% > 75%
  8. 8. Funding of Inter-University Partnerships in EFA (Agencies) AUCC AUCC AUF AUF DFID NUFFIC DDC USAID NUFIC PIE USAID42% 58% Yes No
  9. 9. TeTr Q ach ai ni ua e ng lity r T 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 of of r ain M E in g an d u a g ca Te em tion ac en hi ng t St M aff G et Te en h ac de od s hi r ng Iss R u es es Ad o m urc in es ist No ra n- t io Fo n r m Lite al ra Di Ed cy st a n uc ce atio n EF Mi L ea A no rn in Im r ity g pa G ct ro on up Areas of Involvement (Agencies) So s c Le iety gi sla t io Ev n al ua tio IC n T of O EF th er A s: H IV
  10. 10. Di s ta nc e Te L 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ac ear he n in rT g G ra Te en i de nin ac h rI g Q ing ss ua R ue s lity esTr o ou ai r ni Ev f Ed ces ng a u of lu at ca ti M io n on an ag of E Te em F ac en A hi ng t St M aff et ho ds No n- IC Fo Li T rm te al ra Ed cy Ad uc m a in tion E F Mi is A no tra Im r ity tion pa G ct ro on ups Areas Where HEIS Should Be Involved (Agencies) So c Le iety gi s O latio th n er s: H IV
  11. 11. University Involment in EFA (Agencies) 17%33% 50% Inexistant Insufficient Average
  12. 12. Demand From Universities in the South (Agencies) 17%17% 66% Yes No No answer
  13. 13. University Expertise in EFA (Agencies) 25% 50% 25% Yes No No answer
  14. 14. Total Number of Responses (Institutions) 35% 25 projects63% 2% Questionnaire completed Questionnaire not completed No answer
  15. 15. Target Regions (Institutions) 4% 11% 11% 49% 25%Sub-Saharan Africa Asia & the Pacific Middle East & North AfricaLatin America & The Caribbean North America & Europe
  16. 16. Q ua l ity of Te edu 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 ca Te ac h t io ac er n hi t ng ra in re in g Ad so u m rc Re in es istTr se ra t io a i a rch ni n ng in G of to t en d I m ea er CT an c i a g hing ssu em m es en et t/a hod Di st dm s an in ce st af le ar f ni ng M O in th or ity er s EF gr A ou im ps Areas of Involvement (Institutions) pa Li No ct te n- on ra cy fo rm soc i Ev al e ety al d u a u ca tio t io n of n Le EF gi A sla t io n
  17. 17. Te ac Te he ac rt r 0 5 10 15 20 25 hi Q ng a in in Re ua re EF lity so g se A o ur ar im f ed ces ch in pa uc to ct at te on io ac so n hiTr ng ciet ai m y ni ng G et h en of de ods m an A ri ss a g dm ue em in s ist en ra t/a ti dm on in st af Di st f No a n ce IC n- fo le T rm ar al ni ed ng uc at io Ev al Li n u a ter tio ac n y M of in EF or ity A Areas Where HEIS Should Be Involved (Institutions) gr o Le ups gi sla t io n O th er s
  18. 18. Te ac hi Q n ua g r e lity so 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 of ur Te ed ces uc ac at he io rt n EF G A en ra in im d in Re pa er i g se ct ss ar Ev on ue ch in a so s to lu at c te io iety ac n hi oTr ng f EF ai ni Di st m A ng a n eth of ce od m le s an Ad ar ag m n em ini ing en stra t/a ti dm on No in n- st fo af rm Li te f al ra ed cy uc at io M n in or ity ICT gr o Involvement Areas as Seen from the North (Institutions) Le up gi s sla t io n O th er s
  19. 19. Q ua Re se l ity ar of ch ed uc 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 in Tea to ch at te io ac er t n hi ra Te n in ac g m ing hi et ng ho re d so s No ur n- ce fo s rm al I ed CT uc at i EF G Li on e te A r im n de a cy pa riTr ct ss on ue ai ni Di st s s ng a n oci of ce et m le y an A ar a g dm n em ini ing en stra t/a ti M dm on in i or n st ity a Involvement Areas as Seen from the South gr ff o Ev Le ups al g u a isla tio t io n n of EF A O th er s
  20. 20. Pa rtn 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 er 18 U ni ve rs it y Le ad Un iv er si tyG ov er In nm di en v id ta ua lB ls odG y ov (H er os nm tC en ou ta nt lB ry od ) y (L ea d Co un tr y ) Project Initiator(s) (Institutions) NG O s No an sw er
  21. 21. Problems Encountered (Institutions)14121086420 No problem Support from Others EFA Expertise Funding Recognition of encountered Local within University Authorities University Competence
  22. 22. University involvement in EFA (Institutions) 18%6%9% 67% Insufficient Non-existent Adequate No answer
  23. 23. Reasons for Non-Involvement (Institutions)109876543210 Lack of Lack of Lack of Lack of Lack of Lack of No answer support opportunity recognition expertise interest demand
  24. 24. Demand from Universities in the South (Institutions) 39%43% 18% Yes No No answer
  25. 25. Changes Needed to Improve the Participation of HE in EFA (Institutions)2520151050 Governmental policy in Donor agency funding Institutional policy International agencies HE and organisations
  26. 26. Research on EFA (Institutions)14121086420 Insufficient Non-existent Adequate Excessive Non-responses
  27. 27. Two Workshops• State of the Art: Experience in Supporting EFA: Opportunities and Challenges – Thursday afternoon• The Way Forward: Towards a Greater Implication in EFA: Perspectives and Priorities – Friday morning
  28. 28. Expected Outcomes• Why and How HE should (or should not) contribute more to achieving EFA goals?• What HE could do concretely for EFA through its three principal functions (education, research and services)?• What effective tools could be developed to improve, if necessary, the involvement of HE in EFA?