Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Focus on Student Engagement: Individual Learning Plans


Published on

Learn all there is to know about Individual Learning Plans, including state policies, best practices, implementation, data collection and a detailed analysis on improving current student outcomes and policies.

Todd Bloom
Chief Academic Officer

Jim Bierma
College Readiness Consortium, University of Minnesota
Program Director

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

Focus on Student Engagement: Individual Learning Plans

  1. 1. Focus on Student Engagement: Individual Learning Plans Todd Bloom, Ph.D Chief Academic Officer Hobsons Jim Bierma Program Director College Readiness Consortium University of Minnesota Texas Association of School Administrators January 31, 2012
  2. 2. <ul><li>Background on ILPs </li></ul><ul><ul><li>State Policies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Characteristics and Components </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Best Practices for ILP Implementation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Student Engagement </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Networks of Student Support </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Data Collection and Analysis/Feedback Loops </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Improving Student Outcomes </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Improving Policies and Practices </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Q & A </li></ul>AGENDA
  3. 3. Background on Individual Learning Plans
  4. 4. <ul><li>Education for All Handicapped Children Act (1975) mandated Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) for students receiving special education services. </li></ul><ul><li>IEP characteristics: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Coordination of people and services </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Student and parent engaged in planning process </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Education plan developed around unique abilities and needs of each student </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Plan updated annually at a minimum </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Plan considers academic and non-academic </li></ul></ul>ILP Background
  5. 5. <ul><li>Shift towards ILPs for all students: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Success of IEPs, ineffectiveness of “1-size fits all” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Increased focus and clarity on student achievement </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>National and state reform agendas require data on student outcomes </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Goal of students graduating college and career ready </li></ul></ul>ILP Background
  6. 6. <ul><li>All 50 states and the DC has an initiative that promotes college and career planning for HS students: </li></ul><ul><li>25 states and DC mandate ILPs </li></ul><ul><li>3 states mandate a guidance framework that does not include a formal planning document </li></ul><ul><li>22 states do not have a mandate, but… </li></ul><ul><ul><li>9 of them provide ILP models </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>13 provide a guidance framework for districts to use </li></ul></ul>State Policies
  7. 7. <ul><li>2003 TX Personal Graduation Plan requires Personal Graduation Plans for students at risk of not receiving a diploma: </li></ul><ul><li>“ identify educational goals for the student; </li></ul><ul><li>include diagnostic information, appropriate monitoring and intervention, and other evaluation strategies; </li></ul><ul><li>include an intensive instruction program; </li></ul><ul><li>address participation of the student’s parent or guardian, including consideration of the parent’s or guardian’s educational expectations for the student; and </li></ul><ul><li>provide innovative methods to promote the student’s advancement, including flexible scheduling, alternative learning environments, on-line instruction, and other interventions that are proven to accelerate the learning process and have been scientifically validated to improve learning and cognitive ability.” </li></ul>TX Policy
  8. 9. <ul><li>Academic plan </li></ul><ul><li>Academic, career and personal goals </li></ul><ul><li>Career exploration </li></ul><ul><li>Resume builder </li></ul><ul><li>Regular updates (annually is most common) </li></ul><ul><li>Personal reflection </li></ul>Characteristics of ILP Frameworks
  9. 10. <ul><li>Personality and learning style assessments </li></ul><ul><li>Identification of strengths and needs </li></ul><ul><li>Action plan </li></ul><ul><li>Service learning </li></ul><ul><li>Link to learning support services </li></ul>Characteristics of ILP Frameworks
  10. 12. Best Practices for ILP Implementation
  11. 13. <ul><li>Emphasize the individual in the ILP </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Student learns about own learning strengths and needs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Student has tools to explore academic, career and personal interests and to make goals </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Student owns planning, learning and outcomes </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Create a support team for each student </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Parental/Guardian involvement </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Involve all appropriate staff in planning process </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Connect student to learning resources </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Peer support </li></ul></ul>ILPs that Engage Students
  12. 18. Data Collection and Analysis/ Feedback Loops
  13. 19. <ul><li>Data Collection </li></ul><ul><ul><li>K-12 information about each student: performance data, courses, goals, exploration activities, extracurricular, etc. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Postsecondary information: enrollment, performance and completion </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Data Analysis </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Where did they go? Are they still there? Did they graduate? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>If they struggled, with what? Did they stop-out? </li></ul></ul>Using Data to Create a Feedback Loop
  14. 20. Washington Tech. Magnet: MCA Test Scores
  15. 21. MPS Accelerated Coursework
  16. 22. MPS Postsecondary Enrollment
  17. 23. <ul><li>Available at: </li></ul><ul><li> </li></ul><ul><li>Or search: “Naviance” and “ILP” </li></ul>Naviance ILP Report
  18. 24. Questions? Todd Bloom [email_address] @Todd_Bloom (952)807-5345 Jim Bierma [email_address] (651)303-2736