Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Informal International Lawmaking (“IN-LAW”)  Prof. Joost Pauwelyn Graduate Institute, Geneva
Project Background <ul><li>HiiL:  Transnational Constitutionality:  Democracy and Accountability in the Context of Informa...
Project Phases <ul><li>I: Mapping the action (case studies) </li></ul><ul><li>II: Incidence & variance (accountability;  e...
IN-LAW Activities to Date <ul><li>HiiL Tender, September 2008 </li></ul><ul><li>IN-LAW Project starts November 2009 </li><...
What is IN-LAW? <ul><li>Cross-border cooperation between public authorities, with or without the participation of private ...
« Informal » dispenses with certain formalities traditionally linked to international law   <ul><li>Output  informality </...
Main Questions <ul><li>Move away from law and international organizations? </li></ul><ul><li>Why & When? (sociological; ta...
Definition of Accountability <ul><li>Broad definition :  responsiveness (v. disregard) to people (both substantively and p...
Lenses to Assess Accountability <ul><li>International v. Domestic </li></ul><ul><li>Internal (delegation) v. External (par...
Calibrating accountability of IN-LAW <ul><li>Need for accountability rises with impact of IN-LAW </li></ul><ul><li>Account...
Accountability of IN-LAW <ul><li>Tension informality & ex post, institutionalized accountability </li></ul><ul><li>Compens...
THE IN-LAW ACCOUNTABILITY TABLE ICH towards non-members & other affected actors FDA towards Brazilian people  (open notice...
Effectiveness <ul><li>Does cooperation materialize? </li></ul><ul><li>Does it stick? </li></ul><ul><li>Does it solve the p...
Preliminary conclusions <ul><li>Variable scale and types of accountability depending on effect </li></ul><ul><li>Importanc...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

LOTF2011 | Joost Pauwelyn

707 views

Published on

Law of the Future 2011
23 & 24 June 2011, Peace Palace, The Hague, The Netherlands

title: Informal International Lawmaking (“IN-LAW”)
By: Prof. Joost Pauwelyn

www.lawofthefuture.org

Published in: News & Politics
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

LOTF2011 | Joost Pauwelyn

  1. 1. Informal International Lawmaking (“IN-LAW”) Prof. Joost Pauwelyn Graduate Institute, Geneva
  2. 2. Project Background <ul><li>HiiL: Transnational Constitutionality: Democracy and Accountability in the Context of Informal International Public Policy-Making </li></ul><ul><li>HiiL: Problem-focused – “informality” makes activity fall between the cracks of both international and domestic law controls? </li></ul><ul><li>“ New” International Law; “Informal” International Lawmaking </li></ul>
  3. 3. Project Phases <ul><li>I: Mapping the action (case studies) </li></ul><ul><li>II: Incidence & variance (accountability; effectiveness; domestic dimension) </li></ul><ul><li>III: Conclusions & suggestions for reform </li></ul>
  4. 4. IN-LAW Activities to Date <ul><li>HiiL Tender, September 2008 </li></ul><ul><li>IN-LAW Project starts November 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>Kick-off meeting, Nov. 2009, Geneva </li></ul><ul><li>1st Workshop, June 2010, Geneva - concepts </li></ul><ul><li>2nd Workshop, Nov. 2010, Leuven - case studies </li></ul><ul><li>3rd Workshop, March 2011, NIAS – case studies & preliminary assessment </li></ul><ul><li>4th Workshop, June 2011, The Hague </li></ul><ul><li>- domestic elaboration & implementation </li></ul>
  5. 5. What is IN-LAW? <ul><li>Cross-border cooperation between public authorities, with or without the participation of private actors and/or international organizations, in a forum other than a traditional international organization ( process informality ), and/or as between actors other than traditional diplomatic actors (such as regulators or agencies) ( actor informality ) and/or which does not result in a formal treaty or other traditional source of international law ( output informality ). </li></ul>
  6. 6. « Informal » dispenses with certain formalities traditionally linked to international law <ul><li>Output informality </li></ul><ul><li>does not lead to a formal treaty or any other traditional source of international law, but rather to a guideline, standard, declaration or even more informal policy coordination or exchange </li></ul><ul><li>- Less domestic oversight? </li></ul><ul><li>- Is it even international law? </li></ul><ul><li>Process informality </li></ul><ul><li>occurs in a loosely organized network or forum rather than a traditional international organization (think of the G-20, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision or the Financial Action Task Force, versus the UN or the WTO) </li></ul><ul><li>- Subject of international law? </li></ul><ul><li>- Less or more accountable? </li></ul><ul><li>Actor informality </li></ul><ul><li>does not engage traditional diplomatic actors (such as heads of state, foreign ministers or embassies) but rather other ministries, domestic regulators, independent or semi-independent agencies (such as food safety authorities or central banks), sub-federal entities (such as provinces or municipalities) or the legislative or judicial branch. </li></ul><ul><li>- Subject of international law? </li></ul><ul><li>- Less or more accountable? </li></ul>
  7. 7. Main Questions <ul><li>Move away from law and international organizations? </li></ul><ul><li>Why & When? (sociological; tactical; normative) </li></ul><ul><li>Not whether IN-LAW “is” law but “regulated by” law (coercion only through law) </li></ul><ul><li>Subject to domestic law controls (problem of external stakeholders) </li></ul><ul><li>Subject to international law controls (problem of consent; outdated & running behind?) </li></ul><ul><li>Blurring of domestic v. international, public v. private divides </li></ul><ul><li>Neglected in legal research, law school curriculum </li></ul>
  8. 8. Definition of Accountability <ul><li>Broad definition : responsiveness (v. disregard) to people (both substantively and procedurally) ( Slaughter/Stewart ) </li></ul><ul><li>Narrow definition : ex post, institutionalized relation between actor and forum ( Bovens ) </li></ul>
  9. 9. Lenses to Assess Accountability <ul><li>International v. Domestic </li></ul><ul><li>Internal (delegation) v. External (participation) </li></ul><ul><li>Substantive (output) v. Procedural (input) </li></ul><ul><li>Democratic (as virtue) v. Neutral (as mechanism) </li></ul><ul><li>Preconditions (transparency) v. Mechanisms (narrow sense: electoral; hierarchical; supervisory; fiscal & legal) v. Other Accountability-Promoting Measures (broad sense: market; peer; reputation) </li></ul><ul><li>Ex ante v. Ongoing v. Ex post Control </li></ul><ul><li>Independence v. Accountability </li></ul><ul><li>No one-size fit all (spectrum: deficit – overload) </li></ul>
  10. 10. Calibrating accountability of IN-LAW <ul><li>Need for accountability rises with impact of IN-LAW </li></ul><ul><li>Accountability can be organized at different levels, be of different types & require different tools </li></ul><ul><li>Substantive principles against which to be held to account (universal?) </li></ul><ul><li>Evaluation frameworks to assess accountability regimes </li></ul>
  11. 11. Accountability of IN-LAW <ul><li>Tension informality & ex post, institutionalized accountability </li></ul><ul><li>Compensated by other, novel mechanisms </li></ul><ul><li>Not more but better accountability (deficit v. overload/effectiveness/independence) </li></ul><ul><li>(timing, level, relationship, mechanism) </li></ul><ul><li>Internal accountability at international level (to extent de jure or de facto powers; agency) & especially at domestic level (electoral, hierarchical, supervisory, fiscal & legal) </li></ul><ul><li>External accountability especially at international level (less domestically) </li></ul>
  12. 12. THE IN-LAW ACCOUNTABILITY TABLE ICH towards non-members & other affected actors FDA towards Brazilian people (open notice & comment procedure in US) FDA towards Brazilian people ICH towards non-members & other affected actors (Brazil gets voice & input at ICH) Toward EXTERNAL Stakeholders ‘ law-takers’ affected by IN-LAW; participation model ICH towards ICH members & their constituencies FDA towards US people; FDA bound to US regulations also for international (ICH) activity FDA towards US people, other internal stakeholders ( de facto application of US law to ICH) ICH towards ICH members & their constituencies (voting, transparency etc. at ICH) Toward INTERNAL stakeholders ‘ law-makers’ part of IN-LAW; delegation model IN-LAW network as such Individual participants Individual participants IN-LAW network as such Accountability at the DOMESTIC Level Accountability at the INTERNATIONAL Level
  13. 13. Effectiveness <ul><li>Does cooperation materialize? </li></ul><ul><li>Does it stick? </li></ul><ul><li>Does it solve the problem? </li></ul><ul><li>Does it do so in a cost-effective way? </li></ul><ul><li>Accountability = effectiveness (substantive responsiveness; learning dimension) </li></ul>
  14. 14. Preliminary conclusions <ul><li>Variable scale and types of accountability depending on effect </li></ul><ul><li>Importance of domestic law & accountability </li></ul><ul><li>Complement with international accountability especially toward external stakeholders </li></ul><ul><li>Flexible common law set of principles (procedural & substantive) to achieve accountability of IN-LAW </li></ul><ul><li>Effective IN-LAW more accountable than formal international law? (informalize formal law rather than formalize informal law) </li></ul><ul><li>Adjust notion of “law”? (monist countries; interaction; academic discipline; law school curriculum) </li></ul><ul><li>Whether or not “law”, if IN-LAW affects fundamental rights, must be controlled “by law” </li></ul>

×