Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions: What's the Evidence?

Health Evidence™
Health Evidence™Health Evidence™
Welcome!
Decision aids for people
facing health treatment or
screening decisions:
What's the Evidence?
You will be placed on hold until the webinar begins.
The webinar will begin shortly, please remain on the line.
What’s the evidence?
Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, Bennett CL,
Barry MJ, Eden KB, et al. (2014). Decision
aids for people facing health treatment or
screening decisions. Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews, 2014(1), CD001431.
http://www.healthevidence.org/view-
article.aspx?a=21567
• Use Q&A to post comments /
questions during the webinar
– ‘Send’ questions to All (not
privately to ‘Host’)
• Connection issues
– Recommend using a wired
Internet connection (vs.
wireless),
• WebEx 24/7 help line
– 1-866-229-3239
Q&A
Participant Side
Panel in WebEx
Housekeeping
Welcome!
You will be placed on hold until the webinar begins.
The webinar will begin shortly, please remain on the line.
Decision aids for people
facing health treatment or
screening decisions:
What's the Evidence?
The Health Evidence Team
Maureen Dobbins
Scientific Director
Heather Husson
Manager
Susannah Watson
Project Coordinator
Robyn Traynor
Publications Consultant
Research Assistants
Yaso Gowrinathan
Kelly Graham
Kristin Read
Emily Sully
Alice Wang
Students
Reza Yousefi Nooraie
PhD candidate)
Jennifer Yost
Assistant Professor
What is www.healthevidence.org?
Evidence
Decision
Making
inform
Why use www.healthevidence.org?
1. Saves you time
2. Relevant & current evidence
3. Transparent process
4. Supports for EIDM available
5. Easy to use
A Model for Evidence-
Informed Decision Making
National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. (revised 2012). A
Model for Evidence-Informed Decision-Making in Public Health (Fact
Sheet). [http://www.nccmt.ca/pubs/FactSheet_EIDM_EN_WEB.pdf]
Stages in the process of
Evidence-Informed Public Health
National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. Evidence-Informe
Public Health. [http://www.nccmt.ca/eiph/index-eng.html]
Poll Question #1
Have you heard of a PICO(S) question
before?
1. Yes
2. No
Searchable Questions Think “PICOS”
1.Population (situation)
2.Intervention (exposure)
3.Comparison (other group)
4.Outcomes
5.Setting
Dawn Stacey RN PhD CON(C) holds a Research Chair in
Knowledge Translation to Patients and is a Full Professor in the
School of Nursing at the University of Ottawa.
Dr. Stacey is a Scientist at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute where she is Director
of the Patient Decision Aids Research Group. She is the principal-investigator for the
Cochrane Review of Patient Decision Aids, co-chair of the Steering Committee for the
International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration (IPDAS), and co-investigator
for the Cochrane Review of Interventions to Improve the Adoption of Shared Decision
Making.
Her research includes: knowledge translation to patients; patient decision aid
development, evaluation and appraisal; decision coaching; implementation of decision
aids and decision coaching into practice; telephone-based care, and interprofessional
approaches to shared decision making. She is collaborating with the Ministry of Health
in Saskatchewan to implement shared decision making and patient decision aids across
the province. Her research program website is http://decisionaid.ohri.ca.
Dawn Stacey
Should men have screening for
prostate cancer?
yes
no
Is congruent
Choice
With the
best
available
evidence
and
informed
patient
values
International Patient Decision Aids Standards 2006 & 2013; http://ipdas.ohri.ca/
Quality decision
(College des Médecins
du Quebec, 2013)
Inform
• Provide facts: Condition, options, benefits, harms
• Communicate probabilities
Clarify values
• Ask which benefits/harms matters most
• Share patient experiences
Support
• Guide in steps in
deliberation/communication
• Worksheets, list of questions
Patient Decision Aids adjuncts to counseling
Stacey et al., Cochrane Library, 2014
If 100 men are screened If 100 men are not screened
18 diagnosed with prostate ca
(15 due to screening, 3 due to symptoms)
11 diagnosed with prostate ca after
developing symptoms (most >70 yr)
3 develop metastases 4 develop metastases
2 die of prostate cancer
16 with prostate cancer die of
something else
3 die of prostate cancer
8 with prostate cancer die of
something else
6 would never have known they had
prostate cancer (overdiagnosis)
9 would die of other causes anyway
1 does not die of prostate ca because
he was screened
FACTS: 100 men screened yearly 55-
70 and followed to end of life
VERSUS 100 men not screened
(College des Médecins
du Quebec, 2013)
Reasons to get screened Reasons not to be screened
Be reassured that you don’t have
prostate ca
Being worried that you might have
cancer when you don’t (false alarms) –
most positive screening is simply
enlarged due to age
Not having metastases and not dying
of prostate ca
Being diagnosed with ca and having
unnecessary treatments
Willing to accept the side effects of a
prostate biopsy if needed
I don’t want the risks of side effects
from a prostate biopsy
Willing to accept side effects of tx or
to live with knowing I have prostate ca
I don’t want to take the risk of having
side effects from treatment
Willing to accept that cancer found by
screening would never have caused
problems during my life if it hadn’t
been found
I don’t think screening tests are
reliable enough
What matters most?
(College des Médecins
du Quebec, 2013)
http://www.boitedecision.ulaval.ca
/index.php?id=810&L=0
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions: What's the Evidence?
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions: What's the Evidence?
Review
Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ,
Eden KB, et al. (2014). Decision aids for people
facing health treatment or screening
decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews, 2014(1), CD001431.
Acknowledgements: A Saarimaki, S Beach, R Wu
Funded by University of Ottawa Research Chair in KT to Patients
PICO Eligible Ineligible
Population
Adults making decision
for themselves or family
member
Decisions: hypothetical,
lifestyle, clinical trial
entry, advance directives
Intervention
Patient decision aid for
treatment or screening
decisions
Patient education;
promotes compliance;
passive informed consent
Comparison
Usual care or alternate
intervention
Same decision aid in both
groups
Outcomes
Decision quality; decision
making process; patient,
practitioner, system level
Study design RCT only All other designs
PICO Eligible Ineligible
Population
Adults making decision
for themselves or family
member
Decisions: hypothetical,
lifestyle, clinical trial
entry, advance directives
Intervention
Patient decision aid for
treatment or screening
decisions
Patient education;
promotes compliance;
passive informed consent
Comparison
Usual care or alternate
intervention
Same decision aid in both
groups
Outcomes
Decision quality; decision
making process; patient,
practitioner, system level
Study design RCT only All other designs
• Medline (1966 to June 2012)
• CINAHL (1982 to Sept 2008*)
• Embase (1980 to June 2012)
• PsychINFO (1806 to June 2012)
• Cochrane Central Register of
Controlled Trials (June 2012)
* Not indexed on OVID after Sept 2008
Methods: Data Sources
• 2 reviewers independently screened and
extracted data using structured forms
• RCT quality was assessed using Cochrane’s
criteria for judging risk of bias:
– sequence generation
– allocation concealment
– blinding
– Completeness of outcome data
– selective outcome reporting (published/registered protocols)
– other potential threats to validity
• Inconsistencies resolved by consensus
Data Screen & Extraction
Cochrane Review PtDAs Updates
17
35
55
86
115
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1999 2003 2009 2011 2014
International
patient
decision aid
standards
(IPDAS)
Criteria
2005
Search Results (Jan 2010 - Jun 2012)
38,069 + 247 citations
2,072 abstract screen
358 full-text screen
186 excluded
30 ongoing
82 + 33 =115 trials
(142 citations)
Topics of Decision Aids (N=115)
• Medical (n=27+9)
– 10 HRT
– 3 atrial fib anti-coag
– 2+1 cardiovascular (Sheridan)
– 2+1 diabetes (Mann D)
– 1 hypertension
– 1+1 osteoporosis (Montori)
– 1+1 chemotherapy (Leighl)
– 1 multiple sclerosis
– 1 schizophrenia
– 1 depression
– 1 natural health products
– 1 ovarian risk management
– 1+1 breast ca prevention (Fagerlin)
– 1+1 osteoarthritis knee (de Achaval)
– (1) acute respiratory infection (Légaré)
– (1) contraceptives (Langston)
– coronary angiogram access site (Schwalm)
• Screening (n=31+15)
– 11+4 PSA (Allen, Evans, Myers, Rubel)
– 7 BRCA1/2 genetic
– 6+5 colon cancer (Lewis, Miller, Schroy, Smith, Steckelberg)
– 5+1 prenatal (Björklund)
– 1 colon ca genetic
– 1+1 mammography (Mathieu 2010)
– 2 diabetes (Mann E, Marteau)
– 1 cervix ca (McCaffery)
– Stress testing for chest pain (Hess)
• Surgical (n=17+6)
– 4+1 mastectomy (Jibaja-Weiss)
+1 reconstruction
– 3+1 prostatectomy (Berry)
– 3+1 hysterectomy (Solberg)
– 2 prophylactic BRCA1/2
– 1 dental
– 2 coronary revascularization
– 1 orchiectomy for prostate ca
– 1 back
– (1) bariatric (Arterburn)
– (1) vasectomy (Labrecque)
– (1) long term feeding tube placement
(Hanson)
• Obstetrics (n=4+2)
– 2 VBAC
– 1 termination
– 1 breech
– (1) labour analgesia (Raynes-Greenow)
– (1) embryo transplant (van Peperstraten)
• Vaccine (n=1+1)
– 1 Hep B
– (1) influenza (Chambers)
• Other (n=2)
– 1 autologous blood donation
– 1 CF referral for transplant
To Find Decision Aids
Google: ‘decision aid’
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions: What's the Evidence?
Elements in Patient Decision Aids
(N=115)
100% Options, outcomes, implicit values clarification
91% Clinical condition
88% Probabilities of benefits and harms
63% Guidance in steps of decision making
59% Explicit values clarification
50% Examples of others/ others’ opinions
Trials Reporting Attributes of Decision Quality
77% Used at Least 1 Measure
34
13% Higher Knowledge
RR 13.29 [11.3, 15.3] – 42 studies
Sub-analysis
- Screening 12.76 [9.7, 15.7] – 19 studies
- Treatment 13.75 [11.1, 16.4] – 23 studies
82% More Accurate Risk Perceptions
RR 1.82 [1.5, 2.2] – 19 studies
• Screening 2.03 [1.4, 2.9] – 7 studies
• Treatment 1.72 [1.5, 2.0] – 12 studies
51% More Informed Values-Based Choices
RR 1.51 [1.17, 1.96] – 13 studies
• Screening 1.56 [1.2, 2.1] – 10 studies (used MMIC approach)
• Treatment 1.35 [0.8, 2.3] – 3 studies (used other measures)
-14% Uptake of PSA testing
RR 0.87 [0.77, 0.98] – 9 studies
Compared to Usual Care, PtDAs…
 13% higher
knowledge scores
(14% 2011)
 82% more
accurate risk
perception (74%
2011)
 51% better match
between values &
choices (25% 2011)
 6% Reduce decisional conflict (6% 2011)
 Help undecided to decide (41%) (43% 2011)
 Patients 34% less passive in decisions
(39% 2011)
 Improved patient-practitioner
communication
 Potential to reduce over-use
• 20% surgery (same 2011)
• 14% PSA (-15% 2011)
• 27% HRT (no new studies )
Findings similar for screening and treatment
 Improve decision quality
Other Outcomes (N=115)
2 (of 6) Trials Showed Savings $$$
• Kennedy 2002 - hysterectomy
– ↓ invasive surgical procedures resulting in PtDA with nurse coaching having
lowest mean cost compared to DA alone or usual care
• van Peperstraten 2010 – IVF
– Saved $219.12 per patient in decision aid group compared to usual care
• Montgomery 2007/Hollinghurst 2010
– No difference in costs for decision about delivery mode after cesarean
• Murray 2001a, 2001b – HRT use, prostatectomy
– No difference in health service resource use; higher cost with expensive
interactive videodisc PtDA but if substitute lower cost internet access, no diff
• Vuorma 2003 - hysterectomy
– No difference in health service resource use; no difference between PtDA and
usual care for treatment costs and productivity loss
Summary of findings
• Patients exposed to PtDAs
– more involved in making health decisions (+34%)
– fewer are undecided (-41%)
– improve knowledge (+13%) and expectations
– enhance values-choice agreement (+51%)
• PtDAs may reduce the use of discretionary surgery
(-20%) or screening (-14% PSA) particularly when base
rates are higher
• More research: cost-effectiveness, adherence to chosen option,
health outcomes linked to preferred outcomes, influence of context
Other research findings on…
• Sub-analysis
– coaching (Stacey et al 2013);
– context (Brown et al. in press);
– low literacy (McCaffery et al 2013)
– adherence (Trenaman et al. submitted)
– values- choice measures (Munro et al. submitted)
– Elements in the decision aid (IPDAS series of 13
papers, 2013)
Importance of this Review
• Patient decision aids are effective
interventions for people facing treatment or
screening decisions
• A to Z inventory
• BUT they are not being used!
http://healthydebate.ca/2015/01/topic/quality/decision-aids
• Current research is focused on implementing
them within health care services
USA: R. 3590 The Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act (March 2010)
http://decisionaid.ohri.ca
A Model for Evidence-
Informed Decision Making
National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. (revised 2012). A
Model for Evidence-Informed Decision-Making in Public Health (Fact
Sheet). [http://www.nccmt.ca/pubs/FactSheet_EIDM_EN_WEB.pdf]
Poll Question #2
Did you find the information presented
today helpful?
1. Yes
2. No
Poll Question #3
Was this information new to you?
1. Yes
2. No
Questions?
Thank you!
Contact us:
info@healthevidence.org
For a copy of the presentation please visit:
http://www.healthevidence.org/webinars.asp
x
Login with your Health Evidence username and
password, or register if you aren’t a member yet.
1 of 50

Recommended

School and community social influence programming for preventing tobacco and ... by
School and community social influence programming for preventing tobacco and ...School and community social influence programming for preventing tobacco and ...
School and community social influence programming for preventing tobacco and ...Health Evidence™
2.2K views25 slides
Advisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems Spring 2014 Meeting by
Advisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems Spring 2014 MeetingAdvisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems Spring 2014 Meeting
Advisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems Spring 2014 MeetingPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
2.2K views109 slides
Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials Spring 2014 Meeting by
Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials Spring 2014 MeetingAdvisory Panel on Clinical Trials Spring 2014 Meeting
Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials Spring 2014 MeetingPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
687 views95 slides
From Research to Practice: New Models for Data-sharing and Collaboration to I... by
From Research to Practice: New Models for Data-sharing and Collaboration to I...From Research to Practice: New Models for Data-sharing and Collaboration to I...
From Research to Practice: New Models for Data-sharing and Collaboration to I...Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
819 views56 slides
Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement Spring 2014 Meeting: Day 1 by
Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement Spring 2014 Meeting: Day 1Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement Spring 2014 Meeting: Day 1
Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement Spring 2014 Meeting: Day 1Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
1.1K views89 slides
Reducing sitting time at work: What's the evidence? by
Reducing sitting time at work: What's the evidence?Reducing sitting time at work: What's the evidence?
Reducing sitting time at work: What's the evidence?Health Evidence™
478 views45 slides

More Related Content

What's hot

Interventions with potential to reduce sedentary time in adults: What's the e... by
Interventions with potential to reduce sedentary time in adults: What's the e...Interventions with potential to reduce sedentary time in adults: What's the e...
Interventions with potential to reduce sedentary time in adults: What's the e...Health Evidence™
1.4K views48 slides
Exercise programs for people with dementia: What's the evidence? by
Exercise programs for people with dementia: What's the evidence?Exercise programs for people with dementia: What's the evidence?
Exercise programs for people with dementia: What's the evidence?Health Evidence™
1.1K views47 slides
School-based interventions to prevent HIV, STIs & adolescent pregnancy: What'... by
School-based interventions to prevent HIV, STIs & adolescent pregnancy: What'...School-based interventions to prevent HIV, STIs & adolescent pregnancy: What'...
School-based interventions to prevent HIV, STIs & adolescent pregnancy: What'...Health Evidence™
731 views61 slides
Motivational interviewing for the prevention of alcohol misuse in young adult... by
Motivational interviewing for the prevention of alcohol misuse in young adult...Motivational interviewing for the prevention of alcohol misuse in young adult...
Motivational interviewing for the prevention of alcohol misuse in young adult...Health Evidence™
355 views42 slides
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: What's the evidence? by
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: What's the evidence?Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: What's the evidence?
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: What's the evidence?Health Evidence™
2.2K views69 slides
Behaviour change techniques targeting diet and physical activity in type 2 di... by
Behaviour change techniques targeting diet and physical activity in type 2 di...Behaviour change techniques targeting diet and physical activity in type 2 di...
Behaviour change techniques targeting diet and physical activity in type 2 di...Health Evidence™
1.1K views54 slides

What's hot(20)

Interventions with potential to reduce sedentary time in adults: What's the e... by Health Evidence™
Interventions with potential to reduce sedentary time in adults: What's the e...Interventions with potential to reduce sedentary time in adults: What's the e...
Interventions with potential to reduce sedentary time in adults: What's the e...
Health Evidence™1.4K views
Exercise programs for people with dementia: What's the evidence? by Health Evidence™
Exercise programs for people with dementia: What's the evidence?Exercise programs for people with dementia: What's the evidence?
Exercise programs for people with dementia: What's the evidence?
Health Evidence™1.1K views
School-based interventions to prevent HIV, STIs & adolescent pregnancy: What'... by Health Evidence™
School-based interventions to prevent HIV, STIs & adolescent pregnancy: What'...School-based interventions to prevent HIV, STIs & adolescent pregnancy: What'...
School-based interventions to prevent HIV, STIs & adolescent pregnancy: What'...
Health Evidence™731 views
Motivational interviewing for the prevention of alcohol misuse in young adult... by Health Evidence™
Motivational interviewing for the prevention of alcohol misuse in young adult...Motivational interviewing for the prevention of alcohol misuse in young adult...
Motivational interviewing for the prevention of alcohol misuse in young adult...
Health Evidence™355 views
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: What's the evidence? by Health Evidence™
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: What's the evidence?Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: What's the evidence?
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: What's the evidence?
Health Evidence™2.2K views
Behaviour change techniques targeting diet and physical activity in type 2 di... by Health Evidence™
Behaviour change techniques targeting diet and physical activity in type 2 di...Behaviour change techniques targeting diet and physical activity in type 2 di...
Behaviour change techniques targeting diet and physical activity in type 2 di...
Health Evidence™1.1K views
An integrated model of psychosocial cancer care: a work in progress… by Cancer Institute NSW
An integrated model of psychosocial cancer care: a work in progress…An integrated model of psychosocial cancer care: a work in progress…
An integrated model of psychosocial cancer care: a work in progress…
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies: What's th... by Health Evidence™
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies: What's th...Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies: What's th...
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies: What's th...
Health Evidence™386 views
Health-related effects of government tobacco control policies: What's the evi... by Health Evidence™
Health-related effects of government tobacco control policies: What's the evi...Health-related effects of government tobacco control policies: What's the evi...
Health-related effects of government tobacco control policies: What's the evi...
Health Evidence™1.1K views
Results of a knowledge brokering intervention to promote evidence informed pu... by Health Evidence™
Results of a knowledge brokering intervention to promote evidence informed pu...Results of a knowledge brokering intervention to promote evidence informed pu...
Results of a knowledge brokering intervention to promote evidence informed pu...
Health Evidence™1.4K views
Getting a GRIP October 2007 by suelb
Getting a GRIP October 2007Getting a GRIP October 2007
Getting a GRIP October 2007
suelb289 views
Cancer patients’ experiences in one tertiary referral emergency department (E... by Cancer Institute NSW
Cancer patients’ experiences in one tertiary referral emergency department (E...Cancer patients’ experiences in one tertiary referral emergency department (E...
Cancer patients’ experiences in one tertiary referral emergency department (E...
Comparing screening tools for intimate partner violence detection: What's the... by Health Evidence™
Comparing screening tools for intimate partner violence detection: What's the...Comparing screening tools for intimate partner violence detection: What's the...
Comparing screening tools for intimate partner violence detection: What's the...
Health Evidence™945 views

Similar to Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions: What's the Evidence?

Evidence-Based Practice_Lecture 4_slides by
Evidence-Based Practice_Lecture 4_slidesEvidence-Based Practice_Lecture 4_slides
Evidence-Based Practice_Lecture 4_slidesCMDLearning
10 views14 slides
2017 elsi congress panel meyer only by
2017 elsi congress panel   meyer only2017 elsi congress panel   meyer only
2017 elsi congress panel meyer onlyMichelle N. Meyer
393 views23 slides
Slides from Focus on Frailty 2019 conference main plenary sessions by
Slides from Focus on Frailty 2019 conference main plenary sessionsSlides from Focus on Frailty 2019 conference main plenary sessions
Slides from Focus on Frailty 2019 conference main plenary sessionsHealth Innovation Wessex
1.8K views108 slides
Overweight/obesity prevention, treatment, and maintenance from childhood to a... by
Overweight/obesity prevention, treatment, and maintenance from childhood to a...Overweight/obesity prevention, treatment, and maintenance from childhood to a...
Overweight/obesity prevention, treatment, and maintenance from childhood to a...Health Evidence™
2.7K views34 slides
Pranesh Chakraborty (CHEO): panCanadian Newborn Screening Guidelines by
Pranesh Chakraborty (CHEO): panCanadian Newborn Screening GuidelinesPranesh Chakraborty (CHEO): panCanadian Newborn Screening Guidelines
Pranesh Chakraborty (CHEO): panCanadian Newborn Screening GuidelinesCanadian Organization for Rare Disorders
284 views15 slides
Shared decision making by
Shared decision makingShared decision making
Shared decision makingChai-Eng Tan
3.2K views21 slides

Similar to Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions: What's the Evidence?(20)

Evidence-Based Practice_Lecture 4_slides by CMDLearning
Evidence-Based Practice_Lecture 4_slidesEvidence-Based Practice_Lecture 4_slides
Evidence-Based Practice_Lecture 4_slides
CMDLearning10 views
Slides from Focus on Frailty 2019 conference main plenary sessions by Health Innovation Wessex
Slides from Focus on Frailty 2019 conference main plenary sessionsSlides from Focus on Frailty 2019 conference main plenary sessions
Slides from Focus on Frailty 2019 conference main plenary sessions
Overweight/obesity prevention, treatment, and maintenance from childhood to a... by Health Evidence™
Overweight/obesity prevention, treatment, and maintenance from childhood to a...Overweight/obesity prevention, treatment, and maintenance from childhood to a...
Overweight/obesity prevention, treatment, and maintenance from childhood to a...
Health Evidence™2.7K views
Shared decision making by Chai-Eng Tan
Shared decision makingShared decision making
Shared decision making
Chai-Eng Tan3.2K views
Antiretroviral therapy for pregnant women living with HIV or hepatitis B: Wha... by Health Evidence™
Antiretroviral therapy for pregnant women living with HIV or hepatitis B: Wha...Antiretroviral therapy for pregnant women living with HIV or hepatitis B: Wha...
Antiretroviral therapy for pregnant women living with HIV or hepatitis B: Wha...
Health Evidence™882 views
Προσυμπτωματικός Έλεγχος Υγείας by Evangelos Fragkoulis
Προσυμπτωματικός Έλεγχος ΥγείαςΠροσυμπτωματικός Έλεγχος Υγείας
Προσυμπτωματικός Έλεγχος Υγείας
Family Planning for Persons Living with HIVAIDS_2015 AR and MS by Nikole Gettings
Family Planning for Persons Living with HIVAIDS_2015 AR and MSFamily Planning for Persons Living with HIVAIDS_2015 AR and MS
Family Planning for Persons Living with HIVAIDS_2015 AR and MS
Nikole Gettings256 views
Implementation science tailored to precision prevention by Graham Colditz
Implementation science tailored to precision preventionImplementation science tailored to precision prevention
Implementation science tailored to precision prevention
Graham Colditz133 views
Cancer Survivorship: longer term issues and the role of primary care - Prof E... by Irish Cancer Society
Cancer Survivorship: longer term issues and the role of primary care - Prof E...Cancer Survivorship: longer term issues and the role of primary care - Prof E...
Cancer Survivorship: longer term issues and the role of primary care - Prof E...
Intro to ebd08 review by postguy365
Intro to ebd08 reviewIntro to ebd08 review
Intro to ebd08 review
postguy365273 views
How evidence affects clinical practice in egypt by Wafaa Benjamin
How evidence affects clinical practice in egyptHow evidence affects clinical practice in egypt
How evidence affects clinical practice in egypt
Wafaa Benjamin78 views
Strategies for Long-term Management of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer by bkling
Strategies for Long-term Management of Recurrent Ovarian CancerStrategies for Long-term Management of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
Strategies for Long-term Management of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
bkling25.4K views
SHARE Webinar: Why Should I Join a Clinical Trial with Dr. Hershman by bkling
SHARE Webinar: Why Should I Join a Clinical Trial with Dr. HershmanSHARE Webinar: Why Should I Join a Clinical Trial with Dr. Hershman
SHARE Webinar: Why Should I Join a Clinical Trial with Dr. Hershman
bkling3.3K views
CER 2016 Hernandez patient engagement by CTSI at UCSF
CER 2016 Hernandez patient engagementCER 2016 Hernandez patient engagement
CER 2016 Hernandez patient engagement
CTSI at UCSF691 views

More from Health Evidence™

Spotlight Webinar: Applying a health equity lens to program planning by
Spotlight Webinar: Applying a health equity lens to program planningSpotlight Webinar: Applying a health equity lens to program planning
Spotlight Webinar: Applying a health equity lens to program planningHealth Evidence™
814 views48 slides
Webinaire : Integrer l'equite en sante dans la planification de programmes by
Webinaire : Integrer l'equite en sante dans la planification de programmesWebinaire : Integrer l'equite en sante dans la planification de programmes
Webinaire : Integrer l'equite en sante dans la planification de programmesHealth Evidence™
299 views47 slides
Weight loss interventions for adults who are obese on mortality and morbidity... by
Weight loss interventions for adults who are obese on mortality and morbidity...Weight loss interventions for adults who are obese on mortality and morbidity...
Weight loss interventions for adults who are obese on mortality and morbidity...Health Evidence™
639 views54 slides
Effect of tobacco control policies on perinatal and child health: What's the ... by
Effect of tobacco control policies on perinatal and child health: What's the ...Effect of tobacco control policies on perinatal and child health: What's the ...
Effect of tobacco control policies on perinatal and child health: What's the ...Health Evidence™
516 views88 slides
Effectiveness of vitamin A supplementation for preventing morbidity and morta... by
Effectiveness of vitamin A supplementation for preventing morbidity and morta...Effectiveness of vitamin A supplementation for preventing morbidity and morta...
Effectiveness of vitamin A supplementation for preventing morbidity and morta...Health Evidence™
898 views60 slides
Les interventions en ligne offrant des rétroactions personnalisées pour la pe... by
Les interventions en ligne offrant des rétroactions personnalisées pour la pe...Les interventions en ligne offrant des rétroactions personnalisées pour la pe...
Les interventions en ligne offrant des rétroactions personnalisées pour la pe...Health Evidence™
379 views51 slides

More from Health Evidence™(19)

Spotlight Webinar: Applying a health equity lens to program planning by Health Evidence™
Spotlight Webinar: Applying a health equity lens to program planningSpotlight Webinar: Applying a health equity lens to program planning
Spotlight Webinar: Applying a health equity lens to program planning
Health Evidence™814 views
Webinaire : Integrer l'equite en sante dans la planification de programmes by Health Evidence™
Webinaire : Integrer l'equite en sante dans la planification de programmesWebinaire : Integrer l'equite en sante dans la planification de programmes
Webinaire : Integrer l'equite en sante dans la planification de programmes
Health Evidence™299 views
Weight loss interventions for adults who are obese on mortality and morbidity... by Health Evidence™
Weight loss interventions for adults who are obese on mortality and morbidity...Weight loss interventions for adults who are obese on mortality and morbidity...
Weight loss interventions for adults who are obese on mortality and morbidity...
Health Evidence™639 views
Effect of tobacco control policies on perinatal and child health: What's the ... by Health Evidence™
Effect of tobacco control policies on perinatal and child health: What's the ...Effect of tobacco control policies on perinatal and child health: What's the ...
Effect of tobacco control policies on perinatal and child health: What's the ...
Health Evidence™516 views
Effectiveness of vitamin A supplementation for preventing morbidity and morta... by Health Evidence™
Effectiveness of vitamin A supplementation for preventing morbidity and morta...Effectiveness of vitamin A supplementation for preventing morbidity and morta...
Effectiveness of vitamin A supplementation for preventing morbidity and morta...
Health Evidence™898 views
Les interventions en ligne offrant des rétroactions personnalisées pour la pe... by Health Evidence™
Les interventions en ligne offrant des rétroactions personnalisées pour la pe...Les interventions en ligne offrant des rétroactions personnalisées pour la pe...
Les interventions en ligne offrant des rétroactions personnalisées pour la pe...
Health Evidence™379 views
Build a Social Media Toolkit! Strategies for organisations to engage and opti... by Health Evidence™
Build a Social Media Toolkit! Strategies for organisations to engage and opti...Build a Social Media Toolkit! Strategies for organisations to engage and opti...
Build a Social Media Toolkit! Strategies for organisations to engage and opti...
Health Evidence™3.4K views
L'étiquetage des menus pour réduire les commandes de produits à forte densité... by Health Evidence™
L'étiquetage des menus pour réduire les commandes de produits à forte densité...L'étiquetage des menus pour réduire les commandes de produits à forte densité...
L'étiquetage des menus pour réduire les commandes de produits à forte densité...
Health Evidence™343 views
Menu labelling for reducing energy ordered and consumed: What’s the evidence? by Health Evidence™
Menu labelling for reducing energy ordered and consumed: What’s the evidence?Menu labelling for reducing energy ordered and consumed: What’s the evidence?
Menu labelling for reducing energy ordered and consumed: What’s the evidence?
Health Evidence™576 views
Les cigarettes électroniques pour la cessation tabagique : quelles sont les d... by Health Evidence™
Les cigarettes électroniques pour la cessation tabagique : quelles sont les d...Les cigarettes électroniques pour la cessation tabagique : quelles sont les d...
Les cigarettes électroniques pour la cessation tabagique : quelles sont les d...
Health Evidence™510 views
Interventions for preventing elder abuse: What's the evidence? by Health Evidence™
Interventions for preventing elder abuse: What's the evidence?Interventions for preventing elder abuse: What's the evidence?
Interventions for preventing elder abuse: What's the evidence?
Health Evidence™1.6K views
Les interventions dirigées par des pairs pour éviter la consommation de tabac... by Health Evidence™
Les interventions dirigées par des pairs pour éviter la consommation de tabac...Les interventions dirigées par des pairs pour éviter la consommation de tabac...
Les interventions dirigées par des pairs pour éviter la consommation de tabac...
Health Evidence™736 views
Community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups:... by Health Evidence™
Community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups:...Community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups:...
Community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups:...
Health Evidence™2.4K views
Réduire la consommation de gras saturé pour les maladies cardiovasculaires : ... by Health Evidence™
Réduire la consommation de gras saturé pour les maladies cardiovasculaires : ...Réduire la consommation de gras saturé pour les maladies cardiovasculaires : ...
Réduire la consommation de gras saturé pour les maladies cardiovasculaires : ...
Health Evidence™524 views
Reducing saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease: What's the evidence? by Health Evidence™
Reducing saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease: What's the evidence? Reducing saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease: What's the evidence?
Reducing saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease: What's the evidence?
Health Evidence™1.1K views
Les interventions ayant le potentiel de réduire les périodes de sédentarité c... by Health Evidence™
Les interventions ayant le potentiel de réduire les périodes de sédentarité c...Les interventions ayant le potentiel de réduire les périodes de sédentarité c...
Les interventions ayant le potentiel de réduire les périodes de sédentarité c...
Health Evidence™402 views
Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy: What's the evidence? by Health Evidence™
Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy: What's the evidence?	Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy: What's the evidence?
Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy: What's the evidence?
Health Evidence™3.7K views
Les effets sur la santé des politiques gouvernementales de lutte antitabac : ... by Health Evidence™
Les effets sur la santé des politiques gouvernementales de lutte antitabac : ...Les effets sur la santé des politiques gouvernementales de lutte antitabac : ...
Les effets sur la santé des politiques gouvernementales de lutte antitabac : ...
Health Evidence™504 views

Recently uploaded

16 Best Moisturizers for Oily Skin 2023 by
16 Best Moisturizers for Oily Skin 202316 Best Moisturizers for Oily Skin 2023
16 Best Moisturizers for Oily Skin 2023she2499ss
6 views21 slides
5 safety tips keeping dogs healthy in autumn season by
5 safety tips keeping dogs healthy in autumn season5 safety tips keeping dogs healthy in autumn season
5 safety tips keeping dogs healthy in autumn seasonCanadaVetCare
6 views1 slide
salma almanoori presentation 202317014.pptx by
salma almanoori presentation 202317014.pptxsalma almanoori presentation 202317014.pptx
salma almanoori presentation 202317014.pptxsalmansoori811
5 views9 slides
Private Sector Engagement for Universal Health Coverage.pdf by
Private Sector Engagement for Universal Health Coverage.pdfPrivate Sector Engagement for Universal Health Coverage.pdf
Private Sector Engagement for Universal Health Coverage.pdfAlaa Hamed
81 views35 slides
Presentation1BATH BOMB.pptx by
Presentation1BATH BOMB.pptxPresentation1BATH BOMB.pptx
Presentation1BATH BOMB.pptxSudhanshu Sagar
23 views7 slides

Recently uploaded(20)

16 Best Moisturizers for Oily Skin 2023 by she2499ss
16 Best Moisturizers for Oily Skin 202316 Best Moisturizers for Oily Skin 2023
16 Best Moisturizers for Oily Skin 2023
she2499ss6 views
5 safety tips keeping dogs healthy in autumn season by CanadaVetCare
5 safety tips keeping dogs healthy in autumn season5 safety tips keeping dogs healthy in autumn season
5 safety tips keeping dogs healthy in autumn season
CanadaVetCare6 views
salma almanoori presentation 202317014.pptx by salmansoori811
salma almanoori presentation 202317014.pptxsalma almanoori presentation 202317014.pptx
salma almanoori presentation 202317014.pptx
salmansoori8115 views
Private Sector Engagement for Universal Health Coverage.pdf by Alaa Hamed
Private Sector Engagement for Universal Health Coverage.pdfPrivate Sector Engagement for Universal Health Coverage.pdf
Private Sector Engagement for Universal Health Coverage.pdf
Alaa Hamed81 views
EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS[1] jyoti.pptx by ThakurHarsh11
EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS[1] jyoti.pptxEXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS[1] jyoti.pptx
EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS[1] jyoti.pptx
ThakurHarsh1114 views
Hydrocephalus, meningitis and encephalitis - Pathology by Saili Gaude
Hydrocephalus, meningitis and encephalitis - PathologyHydrocephalus, meningitis and encephalitis - Pathology
Hydrocephalus, meningitis and encephalitis - Pathology
Saili Gaude127 views
Final file - Honoring Excellence India’s Best Dental Clinic of the Year.pdf by insightscareindia
Final file - Honoring Excellence India’s Best Dental Clinic of the Year.pdfFinal file - Honoring Excellence India’s Best Dental Clinic of the Year.pdf
Final file - Honoring Excellence India’s Best Dental Clinic of the Year.pdf
Introduction to Sociology for physiotherapists.pptx by Mumux Mirani
Introduction to Sociology for physiotherapists.pptxIntroduction to Sociology for physiotherapists.pptx
Introduction to Sociology for physiotherapists.pptx
Mumux Mirani52 views
Mental Health in the Educational Community by manalamarzooqi
Mental Health in the Educational CommunityMental Health in the Educational Community
Mental Health in the Educational Community
manalamarzooqi6 views
What’s Next for Hospital Price Transparency in 2024 and Beyond by Health Catalyst
What’s Next for Hospital Price Transparency in 2024 and BeyondWhat’s Next for Hospital Price Transparency in 2024 and Beyond
What’s Next for Hospital Price Transparency in 2024 and Beyond
Health Catalyst6 views
ANIMALS USED IN EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY.pptx by ThakurHarsh11
ANIMALS USED IN EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY.pptxANIMALS USED IN EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY.pptx
ANIMALS USED IN EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY.pptx
ThakurHarsh1116 views
Oral presentation assignment by IIAD7
Oral presentation assignmentOral presentation assignment
Oral presentation assignment
IIAD78 views
A Mixed Method Study Evaluating an Innovative Care Model for Rural Outpatient... by DataNB
A Mixed Method Study Evaluating an Innovative Care Model for Rural Outpatient...A Mixed Method Study Evaluating an Innovative Care Model for Rural Outpatient...
A Mixed Method Study Evaluating an Innovative Care Model for Rural Outpatient...
DataNB8 views

Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions: What's the Evidence?

  • 1. Welcome! Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions: What's the Evidence? You will be placed on hold until the webinar begins. The webinar will begin shortly, please remain on the line.
  • 2. What’s the evidence? Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB, et al. (2014). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2014(1), CD001431. http://www.healthevidence.org/view- article.aspx?a=21567
  • 3. • Use Q&A to post comments / questions during the webinar – ‘Send’ questions to All (not privately to ‘Host’) • Connection issues – Recommend using a wired Internet connection (vs. wireless), • WebEx 24/7 help line – 1-866-229-3239 Q&A Participant Side Panel in WebEx Housekeeping
  • 4. Welcome! You will be placed on hold until the webinar begins. The webinar will begin shortly, please remain on the line. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions: What's the Evidence?
  • 5. The Health Evidence Team Maureen Dobbins Scientific Director Heather Husson Manager Susannah Watson Project Coordinator Robyn Traynor Publications Consultant Research Assistants Yaso Gowrinathan Kelly Graham Kristin Read Emily Sully Alice Wang Students Reza Yousefi Nooraie PhD candidate) Jennifer Yost Assistant Professor
  • 7. Why use www.healthevidence.org? 1. Saves you time 2. Relevant & current evidence 3. Transparent process 4. Supports for EIDM available 5. Easy to use
  • 8. A Model for Evidence- Informed Decision Making National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. (revised 2012). A Model for Evidence-Informed Decision-Making in Public Health (Fact Sheet). [http://www.nccmt.ca/pubs/FactSheet_EIDM_EN_WEB.pdf]
  • 9. Stages in the process of Evidence-Informed Public Health National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. Evidence-Informe Public Health. [http://www.nccmt.ca/eiph/index-eng.html]
  • 10. Poll Question #1 Have you heard of a PICO(S) question before? 1. Yes 2. No
  • 11. Searchable Questions Think “PICOS” 1.Population (situation) 2.Intervention (exposure) 3.Comparison (other group) 4.Outcomes 5.Setting
  • 12. Dawn Stacey RN PhD CON(C) holds a Research Chair in Knowledge Translation to Patients and is a Full Professor in the School of Nursing at the University of Ottawa. Dr. Stacey is a Scientist at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute where she is Director of the Patient Decision Aids Research Group. She is the principal-investigator for the Cochrane Review of Patient Decision Aids, co-chair of the Steering Committee for the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration (IPDAS), and co-investigator for the Cochrane Review of Interventions to Improve the Adoption of Shared Decision Making. Her research includes: knowledge translation to patients; patient decision aid development, evaluation and appraisal; decision coaching; implementation of decision aids and decision coaching into practice; telephone-based care, and interprofessional approaches to shared decision making. She is collaborating with the Ministry of Health in Saskatchewan to implement shared decision making and patient decision aids across the province. Her research program website is http://decisionaid.ohri.ca. Dawn Stacey
  • 13. Should men have screening for prostate cancer? yes no
  • 14. Is congruent Choice With the best available evidence and informed patient values International Patient Decision Aids Standards 2006 & 2013; http://ipdas.ohri.ca/ Quality decision
  • 15. (College des Médecins du Quebec, 2013)
  • 16. Inform • Provide facts: Condition, options, benefits, harms • Communicate probabilities Clarify values • Ask which benefits/harms matters most • Share patient experiences Support • Guide in steps in deliberation/communication • Worksheets, list of questions Patient Decision Aids adjuncts to counseling Stacey et al., Cochrane Library, 2014
  • 17. If 100 men are screened If 100 men are not screened 18 diagnosed with prostate ca (15 due to screening, 3 due to symptoms) 11 diagnosed with prostate ca after developing symptoms (most >70 yr) 3 develop metastases 4 develop metastases 2 die of prostate cancer 16 with prostate cancer die of something else 3 die of prostate cancer 8 with prostate cancer die of something else 6 would never have known they had prostate cancer (overdiagnosis) 9 would die of other causes anyway 1 does not die of prostate ca because he was screened FACTS: 100 men screened yearly 55- 70 and followed to end of life VERSUS 100 men not screened (College des Médecins du Quebec, 2013)
  • 18. Reasons to get screened Reasons not to be screened Be reassured that you don’t have prostate ca Being worried that you might have cancer when you don’t (false alarms) – most positive screening is simply enlarged due to age Not having metastases and not dying of prostate ca Being diagnosed with ca and having unnecessary treatments Willing to accept the side effects of a prostate biopsy if needed I don’t want the risks of side effects from a prostate biopsy Willing to accept side effects of tx or to live with knowing I have prostate ca I don’t want to take the risk of having side effects from treatment Willing to accept that cancer found by screening would never have caused problems during my life if it hadn’t been found I don’t think screening tests are reliable enough What matters most? (College des Médecins du Quebec, 2013)
  • 22. Review Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB, et al. (2014). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2014(1), CD001431. Acknowledgements: A Saarimaki, S Beach, R Wu Funded by University of Ottawa Research Chair in KT to Patients
  • 23. PICO Eligible Ineligible Population Adults making decision for themselves or family member Decisions: hypothetical, lifestyle, clinical trial entry, advance directives Intervention Patient decision aid for treatment or screening decisions Patient education; promotes compliance; passive informed consent Comparison Usual care or alternate intervention Same decision aid in both groups Outcomes Decision quality; decision making process; patient, practitioner, system level Study design RCT only All other designs
  • 24. PICO Eligible Ineligible Population Adults making decision for themselves or family member Decisions: hypothetical, lifestyle, clinical trial entry, advance directives Intervention Patient decision aid for treatment or screening decisions Patient education; promotes compliance; passive informed consent Comparison Usual care or alternate intervention Same decision aid in both groups Outcomes Decision quality; decision making process; patient, practitioner, system level Study design RCT only All other designs
  • 25. • Medline (1966 to June 2012) • CINAHL (1982 to Sept 2008*) • Embase (1980 to June 2012) • PsychINFO (1806 to June 2012) • Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (June 2012) * Not indexed on OVID after Sept 2008 Methods: Data Sources
  • 26. • 2 reviewers independently screened and extracted data using structured forms • RCT quality was assessed using Cochrane’s criteria for judging risk of bias: – sequence generation – allocation concealment – blinding – Completeness of outcome data – selective outcome reporting (published/registered protocols) – other potential threats to validity • Inconsistencies resolved by consensus Data Screen & Extraction
  • 27. Cochrane Review PtDAs Updates 17 35 55 86 115 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1999 2003 2009 2011 2014 International patient decision aid standards (IPDAS) Criteria 2005
  • 28. Search Results (Jan 2010 - Jun 2012) 38,069 + 247 citations 2,072 abstract screen 358 full-text screen 186 excluded 30 ongoing 82 + 33 =115 trials (142 citations)
  • 29. Topics of Decision Aids (N=115) • Medical (n=27+9) – 10 HRT – 3 atrial fib anti-coag – 2+1 cardiovascular (Sheridan) – 2+1 diabetes (Mann D) – 1 hypertension – 1+1 osteoporosis (Montori) – 1+1 chemotherapy (Leighl) – 1 multiple sclerosis – 1 schizophrenia – 1 depression – 1 natural health products – 1 ovarian risk management – 1+1 breast ca prevention (Fagerlin) – 1+1 osteoarthritis knee (de Achaval) – (1) acute respiratory infection (Légaré) – (1) contraceptives (Langston) – coronary angiogram access site (Schwalm) • Screening (n=31+15) – 11+4 PSA (Allen, Evans, Myers, Rubel) – 7 BRCA1/2 genetic – 6+5 colon cancer (Lewis, Miller, Schroy, Smith, Steckelberg) – 5+1 prenatal (Björklund) – 1 colon ca genetic – 1+1 mammography (Mathieu 2010) – 2 diabetes (Mann E, Marteau) – 1 cervix ca (McCaffery) – Stress testing for chest pain (Hess) • Surgical (n=17+6) – 4+1 mastectomy (Jibaja-Weiss) +1 reconstruction – 3+1 prostatectomy (Berry) – 3+1 hysterectomy (Solberg) – 2 prophylactic BRCA1/2 – 1 dental – 2 coronary revascularization – 1 orchiectomy for prostate ca – 1 back – (1) bariatric (Arterburn) – (1) vasectomy (Labrecque) – (1) long term feeding tube placement (Hanson) • Obstetrics (n=4+2) – 2 VBAC – 1 termination – 1 breech – (1) labour analgesia (Raynes-Greenow) – (1) embryo transplant (van Peperstraten) • Vaccine (n=1+1) – 1 Hep B – (1) influenza (Chambers) • Other (n=2) – 1 autologous blood donation – 1 CF referral for transplant
  • 30. To Find Decision Aids Google: ‘decision aid’
  • 32. Elements in Patient Decision Aids (N=115) 100% Options, outcomes, implicit values clarification 91% Clinical condition 88% Probabilities of benefits and harms 63% Guidance in steps of decision making 59% Explicit values clarification 50% Examples of others/ others’ opinions
  • 33. Trials Reporting Attributes of Decision Quality 77% Used at Least 1 Measure
  • 34. 34 13% Higher Knowledge RR 13.29 [11.3, 15.3] – 42 studies Sub-analysis - Screening 12.76 [9.7, 15.7] – 19 studies - Treatment 13.75 [11.1, 16.4] – 23 studies
  • 35. 82% More Accurate Risk Perceptions RR 1.82 [1.5, 2.2] – 19 studies • Screening 2.03 [1.4, 2.9] – 7 studies • Treatment 1.72 [1.5, 2.0] – 12 studies
  • 36. 51% More Informed Values-Based Choices RR 1.51 [1.17, 1.96] – 13 studies • Screening 1.56 [1.2, 2.1] – 10 studies (used MMIC approach) • Treatment 1.35 [0.8, 2.3] – 3 studies (used other measures)
  • 37. -14% Uptake of PSA testing RR 0.87 [0.77, 0.98] – 9 studies
  • 38. Compared to Usual Care, PtDAs…  13% higher knowledge scores (14% 2011)  82% more accurate risk perception (74% 2011)  51% better match between values & choices (25% 2011)  6% Reduce decisional conflict (6% 2011)  Help undecided to decide (41%) (43% 2011)  Patients 34% less passive in decisions (39% 2011)  Improved patient-practitioner communication  Potential to reduce over-use • 20% surgery (same 2011) • 14% PSA (-15% 2011) • 27% HRT (no new studies ) Findings similar for screening and treatment  Improve decision quality
  • 40. 2 (of 6) Trials Showed Savings $$$ • Kennedy 2002 - hysterectomy – ↓ invasive surgical procedures resulting in PtDA with nurse coaching having lowest mean cost compared to DA alone or usual care • van Peperstraten 2010 – IVF – Saved $219.12 per patient in decision aid group compared to usual care • Montgomery 2007/Hollinghurst 2010 – No difference in costs for decision about delivery mode after cesarean • Murray 2001a, 2001b – HRT use, prostatectomy – No difference in health service resource use; higher cost with expensive interactive videodisc PtDA but if substitute lower cost internet access, no diff • Vuorma 2003 - hysterectomy – No difference in health service resource use; no difference between PtDA and usual care for treatment costs and productivity loss
  • 41. Summary of findings • Patients exposed to PtDAs – more involved in making health decisions (+34%) – fewer are undecided (-41%) – improve knowledge (+13%) and expectations – enhance values-choice agreement (+51%) • PtDAs may reduce the use of discretionary surgery (-20%) or screening (-14% PSA) particularly when base rates are higher • More research: cost-effectiveness, adherence to chosen option, health outcomes linked to preferred outcomes, influence of context
  • 42. Other research findings on… • Sub-analysis – coaching (Stacey et al 2013); – context (Brown et al. in press); – low literacy (McCaffery et al 2013) – adherence (Trenaman et al. submitted) – values- choice measures (Munro et al. submitted) – Elements in the decision aid (IPDAS series of 13 papers, 2013)
  • 43. Importance of this Review • Patient decision aids are effective interventions for people facing treatment or screening decisions • A to Z inventory • BUT they are not being used! http://healthydebate.ca/2015/01/topic/quality/decision-aids • Current research is focused on implementing them within health care services
  • 44. USA: R. 3590 The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (March 2010)
  • 46. A Model for Evidence- Informed Decision Making National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. (revised 2012). A Model for Evidence-Informed Decision-Making in Public Health (Fact Sheet). [http://www.nccmt.ca/pubs/FactSheet_EIDM_EN_WEB.pdf]
  • 47. Poll Question #2 Did you find the information presented today helpful? 1. Yes 2. No
  • 48. Poll Question #3 Was this information new to you? 1. Yes 2. No
  • 50. Thank you! Contact us: info@healthevidence.org For a copy of the presentation please visit: http://www.healthevidence.org/webinars.asp x Login with your Health Evidence username and password, or register if you aren’t a member yet.