Sarah Morton has worked across research, policy and practice for most of her career, and will draw on examples from different settings encountered over this time in her presentation. She is keen to interrogate our learning about effective evidence use from the last 20 years, and review how this can be supported from research and practice perspectives. She will present a vision for the effective use of evidence of all kinds to plan, develop and improve policy, practice, and services. As part of this she will explain some of the ways that she is currently developing tools and support for effective evidence use.
Oppenheimer Film Discussion for Philosophy and Film
Getting research into action: issues, challenges, solutions by Dr Sarah Morton
1. Research, Impact, Value & LIS - #lisrival - Edinburgh - 11th July 2019
Practitioner research: value, impact, and priorities
Professor Hazel Hall
Edinburgh Napier University
RIVAL Network Event 1 – July 11th 2019 – Edinburgh
Getting research into action: issues, challenges, solutions
Dr Sarah Morton, Matter of Focus
5. Research impact: where are we now?
• Many research organisations with an impact imperative (in and
out of HE sector)
• Increasing use of outcomes (SDG’s Government performance
systems)
• REF in UK and EIF in Australia
• Shift towards impact:
• Impact prizes (ESRC, NCCPE, etc..)
• Researchers blogging, tweeting etc..
• Funding: e.g.: ESRC impact accelerator account
• Core competency of research staff
6. Universities: Impact through the research cycle
1.Potential/future impact
(Pathways to Impact )
2. Maximising impact of current research
(Knowledge Exchange)
3. Reporting on impact of previous research
(REF Impact)
Developing impact case studies for the REF www.publicengagement.ac.uk
10. City Council of The Hague deliberating in 1636
Jan Antonisz. van Ravesteyn
11. Carol Weiss (1979)
Research used in policy…
Problem solving: evidence to solve policy problems (rarely)
Knowledge-Driven: drives new technological developments
Interactive: interactive, communicative
Political: lobby for political viewpoints
Tactical: to delay action, deflect criticism, etc
Enlightenment: slowly changes conceptualisation of problems and
solutions
12. Practitioners’ ‘mindlines’
Adapted from Gabbay J, and
May A l BMJ 2004;329:1013
each other
practice
experience
Client’s
view
“reps” “the centre”
eg govt department
opinion
leaders
teachers/training
“they say”
reading/updates infrastructure
meetings
And in practice
16. What does it mean to use research?
Research uptake: people are interested in research,
read it, talk about it, come to a presentation etc..
Research use: people do something with the research,
change their view, pass it on to someone else, apply it
to practice or policy
Research impact: a contribution to change as a result
of research use
Morton (2015)
17. Hi! Have you heard
this? It’s really going to
change how you
do things round here.
1. Research does
not speak for
itself
39. • Established relationships and networks with user communities
• Involving users at all stages with research
• Well-planned user-engagement and KTE strategies
• Portfolios of research activity that build reputations with
research users
• Good infrastructure and management support
• The involvement of intermediaries and knowledge brokers as
translators, amplifiers, network providers
*Summary of findings from the UK ESRC’s impact
assessment activities
The most important drivers of impact are:
40. Research utilisation:
what have we learned since 2001?
Research use is:
• a process, not a product
• complex, context specific
• translation, relationships, and systems matter
• often long time frames
• many kinds of evidence.. research just one
44. What difference will it make?
Understanding change
What do we want to change and Who
can make that happen?
We make this happen
if we have the right resources
and activities
We need people to respond well
and have the ability to change
to make this happen
We need other policies and ways
of doing things to be helping and
things beyond our control might
stop this happening
Sphere of indirect influence
Sphere of direct influence
Sphere of direct control
What does the
project do?
People we
have indirectly
influenced do things
differently
People or groups we
directly influence
Here we control what
happens
WHY
WHAT / WHO
HOW