Be the first to like this
ANDALŪZIJAS SUNS DĀVĀ EXPO 08-09.2014 Elizabetes83/85 BergaBazārs ADAM’S RIB Dr. I. KORSHUNOV Moscow-@Happy_ArtMuseum
The person of the artist is the object demanding infinite introspection. Generation behind generation, «authors of art», conducted by a similar steadfast sight on themselves, make efforts to creation of something, approving unique individuality, but recognizing presence of mystical, mysterious spheres which supervise over them.
Historians of art frequently «solve» quite «terrestrial», «profane» a material resources supporting ideology of the artist, or build a history of art as change of historical styles in which the artist, in their opinion, does not play the most important role.
Nevertheless, according to well-known statement of Bourdieu, art and sociology get on badly. Historians of art are sociologically deaf, and sociologists of art are aesthetically blind, – probably on that only to the reason, that in a basis of a art criticism history one more «has lain too long» «divine secret of the individual genius» which only it is possible to admire, and various sociological approaches to art – aspire «to open and condemn – prove» this secret that refers to, on all severity of the law.
Research of this problem is difficult, however safely it is possible to declare consideration of this question, that the present state of affairs in art shows, that it (art) is «private affair» and «private life» of everyone who is engaged in it. As though strange did not sound it's an intimate process. In what a genre operated, what strategy wouldn't used by the author, all over again he needs to go through it inside itself. And is farther as will carry, well or will not carry. It too a mystery.
«Talent» also is shrouded in «fog», and it is no wonder, that scientifically proved researches of talent is not observed almost.
But, despite of it, subjective versions are possible.
Ivan Korshunov's creative credo and his person is not a collective portrait of young generation of the Moscow artists or the character nominal, but can illustrate some theses of the given text clearly.
Today in Russia the certain role is not imposed to the artist: to prove, to discredit, to experiment, to shock. Basically from a tacit consent it is possible to make all. That you can, that you want, well and as too. However any artist al