Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
One Page Summary
Yu SHI & festival.
Lecture 8: Municipalities’ Management of Urban Development – Exploring Non-
Binding Im...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Summary - Lecture 8: City & Environment: Municipalities’ management of urban development: exploring non-binding impact fee system for housing development in 1970s Japan

51 views

Published on

2018 ProSPER.Net Young Researchers' School
Lecture summary prepared by Yu Shi (Tongji University) & Godwin Festival Boateng (RMIT University)

Published in: Government & Nonprofit
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Summary - Lecture 8: City & Environment: Municipalities’ management of urban development: exploring non-binding impact fee system for housing development in 1970s Japan

  1. 1. One Page Summary Yu SHI & festival. Lecture 8: Municipalities’ Management of Urban Development – Exploring Non- Binding Impact Fee System for Housing Development in 1970s Japan The lecture firstly explained the origin of the Non-Binding Impact Fee System for housing development in 1970s Japan. It started with the rapid housing development accompanied with high economic growth in 1960s, which increase the demands for the investment in public infrastructure. Then the administrative guidance was put forward by the government, but it had no legal binding for land developers. The lack of binding force caused tension between municipalities’ demands and non-compliant development. Also, the demand for housing development started to decrease. Accordingly, many municipalities refrained, such as Yokohama. The administrative guideline on impact fee in Yokohama was introduced. The revaluating work was then introduced. The concept of “soft law” was introduced by the speaker. Soft laws are one of the social norms for fairness as hard law is and gives municipalities broader discretion, which does not require rigid process as hard law. The speaker uses the criterion of “loss from incompliance” and “profit from compliance” to revaluate the guidance. He interviewed the city officers of Yokohama government to study why the guidance worked well in Yokohama. He found that for soft law to work well, the subjective profit from compliance or loss from incompliance should be maximized. Then it should strengthen the priority of long term profit. With the practice of impact fee system in Japan, it could provide some experience for developing countries, which is most of the students care about. In the discussion, we can find that the conditions in some developing countries are quite different from that in Japan. In Japan, the legal level is relatively higher than other countries. For example, some people in Pakistan are not willing to pay the tax, which means the hard laws cannot be implemented well, not to mention soft laws. The speaker suggested that even the hard law is strict, it should always consider the people’s compliance intention. Also, the tax should not directly connect to the benefits of government or individuals, in which way the government could lose the trust of the public. The tax can be promised to build school for the public, which benefits the public, and the government have to keep promise. The practice of YOKOHAMA was successful, but it cannot directly be transformed to developing countries because of the different political system, legal system and level of development. More studies have to be done to find the key elements of the municipalities’ management. Many policies in developing countries was just promoted and changed, the revaluation of policies should be emphasized, which could help the government develop more effective policies and laws. The cooperation between government from different countries should be encouraged.

×