1.
Big Data Genomics:
Clustering Billions of DNA
Sequences with Apache Spark
Zhong Wang, Ph.D.
Group Lead, Genome Analysis
05/23/2019

2.
1999-2007
2008-now: JGI as the DOE sequencing center dedicated to plants and microbes.
DOE JGI: A brief history

3.
Our Mission
3
DOE JGI, Serving as a genomic user facility
in support of the DOE missions:
• Walnut Creek 1999-2019
• Berkeley, CA
• 250 employees
• $70M annual budget
bioenergy, carbon cycling, & biogeochemistry

4.
Our sequencer lineups
Miseq
NextSeq 500
Hiseq 2500
PacBio RSII
Oxford Nanopore
Short-read technologies
Long-read technologies
Novaseq 6000
PacBio Sequel
MinION Promethion
200Tb
sequencing data
in FY18
Illumina

5.
Genomics big data is not typical big data
Unstructured
Volume, variety
veracity increases
during analytics

6.
Metagenome is the genome of a microbial community
10s "intimate kiss" = 80 million bacteria
Metagenomics questions: Who are there? What they do? How they interact?

7.
Microbial communities are “dark matters”
Number of Species
Cow
～6000
Human
～1000
Soil,
>100000
>90% of the species haven’t been seen before

8.
Metagenome sequencing and assembly
Harvest
microbes
Extract
DNA
Shear, &
Sequencing
Assembly
Short Reads
Reconstructed
genomes
Microbial
Community
Metagenome
DNA

9.
The metagenome assembly problem
Library of Books Shredded Library “reconstructed” Library
Genome ~= Book Metagenome ~= Library
Sequencing ~= sampling the pieces and read them

10.
Scale is an enemy
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000
Typical Human Cow Ocean Soil
Gigabases (Gb)

11.
Complexity is another…
Remove contaminants,
sequencing errors
Overlap graph
de bruijn graph
Contigs or clusters
Repetitive elements
Homologous genes
Horizontal transferred genes

12.
The ideal solution and the failed ones
 Easy to develop
 Robust
 Scale to big data
 Efficient
BigMem
• Easy to
develop
• Expensive
• Not scale
MPI
• Fast
• Hard to
develop
• Not robust
Hadoop
• Easy to
develop
• Scale
• Slow

13.
Addressing big data: Apache Spark
• New scalable programming paradigm
• Compatible with Hadoop-supported
storage systems
• Improves efficiency through:
• In-memory computing primitives
• General computation graphs
• Improves usability through:
• Rich APIs in Java, Scala, Python
• Interactive shell
 Scale to big data
 Efficient
 Easy to develop
 Robust

14.
Goal: Metagenome read clustering
Read clustering can reduce metagenome problem to
single-genome problem
• Parallel Processing
• Individualized optimization
Reads Read clusters

15.
Algorithm
2 3
1
Node: Read
Edge: number of kmers two reads share
Kmer to reads is what word to sentence
Read graph containing all reads Graph Partitioning: LPA
Kmer-mapping reads
Graph Construction and Edge Reduction Label Propagation Algorithm

16.
Clustering performance on long reads
Read length = 500-20,000

17.
Short reads? Not so much
Read length = 150

18.
Can long reads come in rescue?

19.
Hybrid clustering

20.
A tradeoff between cost and performance
0
50
100
150
200
250
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
mean cluster size (K) #reads (M) #clusters
Percent of long reads used

21.
Short-read only: there is still a way out

22.
More samples, better results: one vs 50

23.
More data, better results:
clustering success is dependent on coverage

24.
Can we scale to big data?

25.
Hardware and software environments
Customized EMR Bridge
nodes 20 20 8
cores 8 (160) 8 (160) 28 (224)
memory 64 (1280) 61 (1220) 128 (1024)
Hadoop 2.7.3 2.7.3 2.7.2
Spark 2.1.1 2.2.0 2.1.0

26.
A quick reminder…
2 3
1
Node: Read
Edge: number of kmers two reads share
Kmer to reads is what word to sentence
Read graph containing all reads Graph Partitioning: LPA
Kmer-mapping reads (KMR)
Graph Construction and Edge Reduction (Edges) Label Propagation Algorithm (LPA)

27.
Scale to bigger data volume on a 20-node cluster
0
200
400
600
800
20 40 60 80 100
ExecutionTime(mins)
Data Size (GB)
KMR Edges LPA Total

28.
Increasing nodes on a 50G-dataset
0
100
200
300
400
500
25 50 75 100
ExecutionTime(mins)
Number of nodes
50G
KMR Edges LPA Total

29.
Fine tune parallelism
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
ExecutionTIme(mins)
Spark default parallelism (log10)
50G 20G

30.
Dataset complexity vs performance
146.33
44.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Human Iso-Seq Alzheimer(PacBio) Cow Rumen(Illumina)
ExecutionTime(mins)
KMR Edges LPA

31.
Platform comparison: Clouds and HPC
Customized EMR Bridge
nodes 20 20 8
cores 8 (160) 8 (160) 28 (224)
memory 64 (1280) 61 (1220) 128 (1024)
Time (min) 106 105 126

32.
Now we have a big hammer…

33.
Clustering for identifying genome contaminants
Russula 70Mb
Bradyrhizobium
7.2Mb
Collimonas: 5.3Mb

34.
Targeting big metagenome projects
Dr. Morgan-Kiss
@ Miami University
Dr. Slonczewski
@Kenyon University
Two lakes, 1.2Tbp

35.
Acknowledgements
Spark Team
Lizhen Shi @FSU
Xiandong Meng
Kexue Li, LiliWang and Li Deng
@Shanghai U
Kurt Labutti
Elizabeth Tseng @PacBio
Lisa Gerhardt , Evan Racah
@ NERSC
Yong Qin, Gary Jung,
Greg Kurtzer, Bernard Li,
@ HPC
Philip Blood,
Bryon Gill
@PSC