SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
Input and Output Hypotheses; a Comparative Essay
Second language acquisition (SLA) has been an extensively discussed field
for the last 50 years. Up to date, several theories about second language acquisition
have been developed. Authors can vary from many places and many ages. The truth
is that as time changes, so the way to acquire a language does, which justifies the
fact that we can find several proposals when it comes to talk about SLA. One
interesting doctrine is Stephen Krashen’s Input Hypothesis, which was introduced
back in 1977 (Krashen, 1977), and Merrill Swain’s Output Theory which came out in
1993 (Swain, 1993). Both are the ideas being compared in this essay, but, in order
to decide how are they compared or contrasted, it is important to point out the main
ideas or structure of each one, presenting a systematic view below.
To begin with, Krashen’s theory, in contrast with Swain’s hypothesis, is made
up of five main points. However, it was not always like that, as it first came up as one
of the five theories, but over the time the term has come to refer to the five hypothesis
as a whole (Krashen, 1985). This five hypothesis includes first the Acquisition-
Learning process, which presents two independent ways of acquiring language, one
being at a subconscious level (acquisition), which is natural and intuitive, from which,
individual do not need to be aware. The other occurs at a conscious level (learning),
frequently in the form of language ‘rules’ or ‘grammar’. Second is the Natural Order
hypothesis, which presents the language as system that is acquired in a predictable
order. Thirdly is the Monitor hypothesis, which is about monitoring our own learning,
being conscious all the time of what we are doing, in other words, while the acquired
system produces the speech, the learned system checks what is being spoken.
Fourthly, is the Input Hypothesis, which claims that we acquire language in just one
way; by receiving an input (receiving skills), that input is said to be ‘comprehensible,
hence understandable to the learner. Lastly is the Affective Filter Hypothesis, which
argues that a learner must be disposed to learn in order to do it, for that he/she must
feel comfortable and also must not be forced to produce language if he/she does not
feel ready for that. A consequence of a learning who does not feel relaxed, would be
a high affective filter, blocking the receiving of input. These five theories build the
nowadays Krashen’s Input Hypothesis which is about to be compared with Swain’s
Output hypothesis presented below.
Compared to professor Krashen’s Input Hypothesis, Swain’s theory has only
three ideas (Swain, 1995). The noticing/triggering theory, which as in Krashen’s
monitor hypothesis, the learners are aware of their knowledge, but, in this case, it is
focused on monitoring mistakes, which triggers them to keep looking for the
adequate knowledge. With the use of this function, the learner can notice that there
are some problems to fix in order to move ahead. The next idea is The Hypothesis-
testing function, which states that, as Krashen also argues, at a conscious level
(Krashen, 1985), in which Swain proposes that the learner, during the process
creates his/her own hypothesis on how the language works, and tries them out along
the learning, resulting in feedback which can lead learners to modify or ‘reprocess’
their output (Swain 1995). The third idea refers to the metalinguistic (reflective)
function, which sees the language as a tool that leads to a reflection on the language
used by the teacher, peers and the student himself/herself (Vigotsky’s sociocultural
theory). When it comes to this theory, it is important to highlight the importance of
the meaning; which is not simply related to understand the meaning that the
transmitter sends to the receiver, but concerns a clear, precise coherent and
appropriate message. After finishing presenting both theories, it is time to make a
deeper comparison.
Moving forward, Krashen’s hypothesis claims that language input (listening
and reading) compose the main communicative process, from which we acquire a
second language (Krashen, 1982). For Krashen, in contrast with Swain, speaking
and writing skills will develop naturally in a learner as they are exposed through a
comprehensible input, losing importance to receiving skills. Such input is one level
more difficult than the current learner’s language level, represented by the formula I
+ 1 (Krashen, 1982) where ‘I’ stands for ‘input’. That is to say, if the second language
learner is adequately exposed to a comprehensible input, the output will be
generated spontaneously, in a natural way. Additionally, and as we have already
explained in the second paragraph, Krashen’s Affective Filter Hypothesis, proposes
that learners should not be forced to produce language (output) if they don’t feel
ready, as this would produce negative feelings developing a high affective filter
interfering with the learning. This is the way in which Krashen presents his idea of
the importance of the input, however, Swain’s thoughts are different.
On the other hand, Swain’s Output hypothesis states that the best way to
acquire a second language is through productive skills (speaking and writing). The
author of this hypothesis argues that thanks to the production of the language, the
learners can actually realize what they know or what they don’t developing
metacognition, or self-awareness of what is being produced. Swain introduces the
term gap to refer to what a learner wants to say but what he or she indeed says,
explaining the importance of producing to find this ‘gap’ so the student gets
motivated towards modifying their interlanguage in order to fill this gap. Also,
professor Swain presents the importance of producing language (output), in four
ways (Swain, 1993), which will serve as aid in SLA. First he presents the production
of the language as a chance for meaningful practice for the learners. The second
way in which producing language might serve in SLA, is that it may force the learner
to move from semantic processing to syntactic processing (Swain, 1993). The third
way is about getting the learners learn formulating their own hypothesis, which are
instantly tested and improved through production of language. Lastly the fourth one
is closely related to the third one, but including peers and the people included in the
communicative environment. Consequently, we can clearly see how the author who
issued this theory totally stands for the output over the input, however, can they be
related?
Although different, we can relate Krashen and Swain’s hypotheses. I hold the
position that both theories are right, but at the same time incomplete. It is true the
fact that, as the input theory hypothesizes, after some training with receiving skills,
learners will strengthen their productive competences, but it is not accurate to say
that it will happen half of the time, therefore comprehensible input is essential in SLA,
but not enough. On the other hand, Swain’s doctrine about producing language to
foster SLA, is also partially accurate, however, and in contrast with Krashen’s
proposal, it is also true that student shouldn’t be forced to produce language,
jeopardizing their motivation to learn a second language, losing it to the fear of
failure.
As a final conclusion we can argue that at the time of complementing the
ideas, we might say that indeed a certain amount of comprehensible input is
necessary before producing any kind of output. Furthermore, both theories are
suitable to different purposes, for example, if the focus is in syntax , the most
adequate theory to use is Swain’s Output Hypothesis, however, if we want to achieve
vocabulary knowledge, Krashen’s input theory will serve in a better way. Finally, and
after having analysed both hypotheses, I can strongly state that both are open to
further develop, and specialized in specific times in specific context with specific
goals.
References
Krashen, S. (1985). “The Input Hypothesis. Issues and Implications” pp. 77 – 109.
Krashen, S. (1977). "Some issues relating to the monitor model". Washington, DC.
Krashen, S. (1982). “Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition”,
University of Southern California.
Swain, M. (1993), “The Output Hypothesis” pp. 158 – 163.
Swain, M. (1995), “Three functions of output in second language learning”.

More Related Content

Similar to Comparative essay arnoldo cabrera

Krashen, five central hypothesis
Krashen, five central hypothesis Krashen, five central hypothesis
Krashen, five central hypothesis solankipintu
 
Krashen’s five proposals on language lea
Krashen’s five proposals on language leaKrashen’s five proposals on language lea
Krashen’s five proposals on language leaSigmund Lieberg
 
Krashen modified [autoguardado]
Krashen modified [autoguardado]Krashen modified [autoguardado]
Krashen modified [autoguardado]damarisescobar1911
 
SECOND LANGUAGE AQUISITION
SECOND LANGUAGE AQUISITION SECOND LANGUAGE AQUISITION
SECOND LANGUAGE AQUISITION ingrid_selene
 
MODULE-2-THEORIES-OF-SLA.pptx
MODULE-2-THEORIES-OF-SLA.pptxMODULE-2-THEORIES-OF-SLA.pptx
MODULE-2-THEORIES-OF-SLA.pptxRoseAnnRoxas1
 
MLE 501 - Language Acquisition, Education, and the Discovery of the Human Per...
MLE 501 - Language Acquisition, Education, and the Discovery of the Human Per...MLE 501 - Language Acquisition, Education, and the Discovery of the Human Per...
MLE 501 - Language Acquisition, Education, and the Discovery of the Human Per...Bernard Paderes
 
A Critical Review of Krashen s Input Hypothesis Three Major Arguments.pdf
A Critical Review of Krashen s Input Hypothesis  Three Major Arguments.pdfA Critical Review of Krashen s Input Hypothesis  Three Major Arguments.pdf
A Critical Review of Krashen s Input Hypothesis Three Major Arguments.pdfErica Thompson
 
John clark
John clarkJohn clark
John clarkbicacafe
 
Bilingualism main and Fundemental concepts in SLA.pptx
Bilingualism main and Fundemental concepts in SLA.pptxBilingualism main and Fundemental concepts in SLA.pptx
Bilingualism main and Fundemental concepts in SLA.pptxNoorhussein32
 
Krashen's monitor model.pptx
Krashen's monitor model.pptxKrashen's monitor model.pptx
Krashen's monitor model.pptxMohdNatiqKhan
 
The natural approach
The natural approach The natural approach
The natural approach muberraoz
 
Diversity group project
Diversity group projectDiversity group project
Diversity group projectYehannys
 
Criticism of Krashen's 5 hypotheses by Manmay Zafr
Criticism of Krashen's 5 hypotheses by Manmay ZafrCriticism of Krashen's 5 hypotheses by Manmay Zafr
Criticism of Krashen's 5 hypotheses by Manmay ZafrShahriarsadikpolokii1
 
A Brief Description Of Second Language Acquisition
A Brief Description Of Second Language AcquisitionA Brief Description Of Second Language Acquisition
A Brief Description Of Second Language AcquisitionSabrina Baloi
 
Second Language Acquisition
Second Language AcquisitionSecond Language Acquisition
Second Language AcquisitionLachesis Braick
 
natural approach.ppt
natural approach.pptnatural approach.ppt
natural approach.pptAhmedGamil42
 

Similar to Comparative essay arnoldo cabrera (20)

Krashen, five central hypothesis
Krashen, five central hypothesis Krashen, five central hypothesis
Krashen, five central hypothesis
 
Krashen’s five proposals on language lea
Krashen’s five proposals on language leaKrashen’s five proposals on language lea
Krashen’s five proposals on language lea
 
Krashen modified [autoguardado]
Krashen modified [autoguardado]Krashen modified [autoguardado]
Krashen modified [autoguardado]
 
SECOND LANGUAGE AQUISITION
SECOND LANGUAGE AQUISITION SECOND LANGUAGE AQUISITION
SECOND LANGUAGE AQUISITION
 
MODULE-2-THEORIES-OF-SLA.pptx
MODULE-2-THEORIES-OF-SLA.pptxMODULE-2-THEORIES-OF-SLA.pptx
MODULE-2-THEORIES-OF-SLA.pptx
 
MLE 501 - Language Acquisition, Education, and the Discovery of the Human Per...
MLE 501 - Language Acquisition, Education, and the Discovery of the Human Per...MLE 501 - Language Acquisition, Education, and the Discovery of the Human Per...
MLE 501 - Language Acquisition, Education, and the Discovery of the Human Per...
 
A Critical Review of Krashen s Input Hypothesis Three Major Arguments.pdf
A Critical Review of Krashen s Input Hypothesis  Three Major Arguments.pdfA Critical Review of Krashen s Input Hypothesis  Three Major Arguments.pdf
A Critical Review of Krashen s Input Hypothesis Three Major Arguments.pdf
 
John clark
John clarkJohn clark
John clark
 
Bilingualism main and Fundemental concepts in SLA.pptx
Bilingualism main and Fundemental concepts in SLA.pptxBilingualism main and Fundemental concepts in SLA.pptx
Bilingualism main and Fundemental concepts in SLA.pptx
 
Krashen's monitor model.pptx
Krashen's monitor model.pptxKrashen's monitor model.pptx
Krashen's monitor model.pptx
 
The natural approach
The natural approach The natural approach
The natural approach
 
Diversity group project
Diversity group projectDiversity group project
Diversity group project
 
Essay
Essay Essay
Essay
 
Essay
EssayEssay
Essay
 
Criticism of Krashen's 5 hypotheses by Manmay Zafr
Criticism of Krashen's 5 hypotheses by Manmay ZafrCriticism of Krashen's 5 hypotheses by Manmay Zafr
Criticism of Krashen's 5 hypotheses by Manmay Zafr
 
A Brief Description Of Second Language Acquisition
A Brief Description Of Second Language AcquisitionA Brief Description Of Second Language Acquisition
A Brief Description Of Second Language Acquisition
 
13768148.ppt
13768148.ppt13768148.ppt
13768148.ppt
 
Second Language Acquisition
Second Language AcquisitionSecond Language Acquisition
Second Language Acquisition
 
natural approach.ppt
natural approach.pptnatural approach.ppt
natural approach.ppt
 
Reaction paper
Reaction paperReaction paper
Reaction paper
 

More from Gustavo Catalan (20)

Word formation processes a cab rera
Word formation processes a cab reraWord formation processes a cab rera
Word formation processes a cab rera
 
Affixation in context
Affixation in contextAffixation in context
Affixation in context
 
Viking britain worksheet
Viking britain worksheetViking britain worksheet
Viking britain worksheet
 
Viking britain
Viking britainViking britain
Viking britain
 
Research paper arnoldo cabrera
Research paper arnoldo cabreraResearch paper arnoldo cabrera
Research paper arnoldo cabrera
 
Cmap arnoldo cabrera
Cmap arnoldo cabreraCmap arnoldo cabrera
Cmap arnoldo cabrera
 
Reading presentation
Reading presentationReading presentation
Reading presentation
 
Reaction paper arnoldo cabrera
Reaction paper arnoldo cabreraReaction paper arnoldo cabrera
Reaction paper arnoldo cabrera
 
Mdd 1
Mdd 1Mdd 1
Mdd 1
 
Lesson plan 21 nov
Lesson plan 21 novLesson plan 21 nov
Lesson plan 21 nov
 
1 lesson plan
1 lesson plan1 lesson plan
1 lesson plan
 
Mdd1
Mdd1Mdd1
Mdd1
 
Tbl ppt
Tbl pptTbl ppt
Tbl ppt
 
Tbl lesson plan
Tbl lesson planTbl lesson plan
Tbl lesson plan
 
Travelling 1 lesson plan
Travelling 1 lesson planTravelling 1 lesson plan
Travelling 1 lesson plan
 
Travelling 1 ppt
Travelling 1 pptTravelling 1 ppt
Travelling 1 ppt
 
Students’ perception of mobile phones
Students’ perception of mobile phonesStudents’ perception of mobile phones
Students’ perception of mobile phones
 
C map an-inconvenient_truth
C map an-inconvenient_truthC map an-inconvenient_truth
C map an-inconvenient_truth
 
Climate changes essay
Climate changes essayClimate changes essay
Climate changes essay
 
Guess who 3.0 food
Guess who 3.0 foodGuess who 3.0 food
Guess who 3.0 food
 

Recently uploaded

Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.raviapr7
 
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICEQuality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICESayali Powar
 
The Singapore Teaching Practice document
The Singapore Teaching Practice documentThe Singapore Teaching Practice document
The Singapore Teaching Practice documentXsasf Sfdfasd
 
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptxmary850239
 
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?TechSoup
 
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptxPatterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptxMYDA ANGELICA SUAN
 
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17Celine George
 
How to Filter Blank Lines in Odoo 17 Accounting
How to Filter Blank Lines in Odoo 17 AccountingHow to Filter Blank Lines in Odoo 17 Accounting
How to Filter Blank Lines in Odoo 17 AccountingCeline George
 
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptxPractical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptxKatherine Villaluna
 
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptxPrescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptxraviapr7
 
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a ParagraphPresentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a ParagraphNetziValdelomar1
 
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptxM-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptxDr. Santhosh Kumar. N
 
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxUltra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxDr. Asif Anas
 
3.19.24 Urban Uprisings and the Chicago Freedom Movement.pptx
3.19.24 Urban Uprisings and the Chicago Freedom Movement.pptx3.19.24 Urban Uprisings and the Chicago Freedom Movement.pptx
3.19.24 Urban Uprisings and the Chicago Freedom Movement.pptxmary850239
 
General views of Histopathology and step
General views of Histopathology and stepGeneral views of Histopathology and step
General views of Histopathology and stepobaje godwin sunday
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxiammrhaywood
 
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17Celine George
 
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George WellsThe Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George WellsEugene Lysak
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
Drug Information Services- DIC and Sources.
 
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
 
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICEQuality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
Quality Assurance_GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE
 
The Singapore Teaching Practice document
The Singapore Teaching Practice documentThe Singapore Teaching Practice document
The Singapore Teaching Practice document
 
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx3.21.24  The Origins of Black Power.pptx
3.21.24 The Origins of Black Power.pptx
 
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
What is the Future of QuickBooks DeskTop?
 
Prelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quiz
Prelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quizPrelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quiz
Prelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quiz
 
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptxPatterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
 
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field read-only in Odoo 17
 
How to Filter Blank Lines in Odoo 17 Accounting
How to Filter Blank Lines in Odoo 17 AccountingHow to Filter Blank Lines in Odoo 17 Accounting
How to Filter Blank Lines in Odoo 17 Accounting
 
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptxPractical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
 
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptxPrescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
Prescribed medication order and communication skills.pptx
 
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a ParagraphPresentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
 
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptxM-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
 
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptxUltra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
Ultra structure and life cycle of Plasmodium.pptx
 
3.19.24 Urban Uprisings and the Chicago Freedom Movement.pptx
3.19.24 Urban Uprisings and the Chicago Freedom Movement.pptx3.19.24 Urban Uprisings and the Chicago Freedom Movement.pptx
3.19.24 Urban Uprisings and the Chicago Freedom Movement.pptx
 
General views of Histopathology and step
General views of Histopathology and stepGeneral views of Histopathology and step
General views of Histopathology and step
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
 
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17
 
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George WellsThe Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
The Stolen Bacillus by Herbert George Wells
 

Comparative essay arnoldo cabrera

  • 1. Input and Output Hypotheses; a Comparative Essay Second language acquisition (SLA) has been an extensively discussed field for the last 50 years. Up to date, several theories about second language acquisition have been developed. Authors can vary from many places and many ages. The truth is that as time changes, so the way to acquire a language does, which justifies the fact that we can find several proposals when it comes to talk about SLA. One interesting doctrine is Stephen Krashen’s Input Hypothesis, which was introduced back in 1977 (Krashen, 1977), and Merrill Swain’s Output Theory which came out in 1993 (Swain, 1993). Both are the ideas being compared in this essay, but, in order to decide how are they compared or contrasted, it is important to point out the main ideas or structure of each one, presenting a systematic view below. To begin with, Krashen’s theory, in contrast with Swain’s hypothesis, is made up of five main points. However, it was not always like that, as it first came up as one of the five theories, but over the time the term has come to refer to the five hypothesis as a whole (Krashen, 1985). This five hypothesis includes first the Acquisition- Learning process, which presents two independent ways of acquiring language, one being at a subconscious level (acquisition), which is natural and intuitive, from which, individual do not need to be aware. The other occurs at a conscious level (learning), frequently in the form of language ‘rules’ or ‘grammar’. Second is the Natural Order hypothesis, which presents the language as system that is acquired in a predictable order. Thirdly is the Monitor hypothesis, which is about monitoring our own learning, being conscious all the time of what we are doing, in other words, while the acquired system produces the speech, the learned system checks what is being spoken. Fourthly, is the Input Hypothesis, which claims that we acquire language in just one way; by receiving an input (receiving skills), that input is said to be ‘comprehensible, hence understandable to the learner. Lastly is the Affective Filter Hypothesis, which argues that a learner must be disposed to learn in order to do it, for that he/she must feel comfortable and also must not be forced to produce language if he/she does not feel ready for that. A consequence of a learning who does not feel relaxed, would be a high affective filter, blocking the receiving of input. These five theories build the nowadays Krashen’s Input Hypothesis which is about to be compared with Swain’s Output hypothesis presented below. Compared to professor Krashen’s Input Hypothesis, Swain’s theory has only three ideas (Swain, 1995). The noticing/triggering theory, which as in Krashen’s monitor hypothesis, the learners are aware of their knowledge, but, in this case, it is focused on monitoring mistakes, which triggers them to keep looking for the adequate knowledge. With the use of this function, the learner can notice that there are some problems to fix in order to move ahead. The next idea is The Hypothesis- testing function, which states that, as Krashen also argues, at a conscious level (Krashen, 1985), in which Swain proposes that the learner, during the process
  • 2. creates his/her own hypothesis on how the language works, and tries them out along the learning, resulting in feedback which can lead learners to modify or ‘reprocess’ their output (Swain 1995). The third idea refers to the metalinguistic (reflective) function, which sees the language as a tool that leads to a reflection on the language used by the teacher, peers and the student himself/herself (Vigotsky’s sociocultural theory). When it comes to this theory, it is important to highlight the importance of the meaning; which is not simply related to understand the meaning that the transmitter sends to the receiver, but concerns a clear, precise coherent and appropriate message. After finishing presenting both theories, it is time to make a deeper comparison. Moving forward, Krashen’s hypothesis claims that language input (listening and reading) compose the main communicative process, from which we acquire a second language (Krashen, 1982). For Krashen, in contrast with Swain, speaking and writing skills will develop naturally in a learner as they are exposed through a comprehensible input, losing importance to receiving skills. Such input is one level more difficult than the current learner’s language level, represented by the formula I + 1 (Krashen, 1982) where ‘I’ stands for ‘input’. That is to say, if the second language learner is adequately exposed to a comprehensible input, the output will be generated spontaneously, in a natural way. Additionally, and as we have already explained in the second paragraph, Krashen’s Affective Filter Hypothesis, proposes that learners should not be forced to produce language (output) if they don’t feel ready, as this would produce negative feelings developing a high affective filter interfering with the learning. This is the way in which Krashen presents his idea of the importance of the input, however, Swain’s thoughts are different. On the other hand, Swain’s Output hypothesis states that the best way to acquire a second language is through productive skills (speaking and writing). The author of this hypothesis argues that thanks to the production of the language, the learners can actually realize what they know or what they don’t developing metacognition, or self-awareness of what is being produced. Swain introduces the term gap to refer to what a learner wants to say but what he or she indeed says, explaining the importance of producing to find this ‘gap’ so the student gets motivated towards modifying their interlanguage in order to fill this gap. Also, professor Swain presents the importance of producing language (output), in four ways (Swain, 1993), which will serve as aid in SLA. First he presents the production of the language as a chance for meaningful practice for the learners. The second way in which producing language might serve in SLA, is that it may force the learner to move from semantic processing to syntactic processing (Swain, 1993). The third way is about getting the learners learn formulating their own hypothesis, which are instantly tested and improved through production of language. Lastly the fourth one is closely related to the third one, but including peers and the people included in the communicative environment. Consequently, we can clearly see how the author who
  • 3. issued this theory totally stands for the output over the input, however, can they be related? Although different, we can relate Krashen and Swain’s hypotheses. I hold the position that both theories are right, but at the same time incomplete. It is true the fact that, as the input theory hypothesizes, after some training with receiving skills, learners will strengthen their productive competences, but it is not accurate to say that it will happen half of the time, therefore comprehensible input is essential in SLA, but not enough. On the other hand, Swain’s doctrine about producing language to foster SLA, is also partially accurate, however, and in contrast with Krashen’s proposal, it is also true that student shouldn’t be forced to produce language, jeopardizing their motivation to learn a second language, losing it to the fear of failure. As a final conclusion we can argue that at the time of complementing the ideas, we might say that indeed a certain amount of comprehensible input is necessary before producing any kind of output. Furthermore, both theories are suitable to different purposes, for example, if the focus is in syntax , the most adequate theory to use is Swain’s Output Hypothesis, however, if we want to achieve vocabulary knowledge, Krashen’s input theory will serve in a better way. Finally, and after having analysed both hypotheses, I can strongly state that both are open to further develop, and specialized in specific times in specific context with specific goals.
  • 4. References Krashen, S. (1985). “The Input Hypothesis. Issues and Implications” pp. 77 – 109. Krashen, S. (1977). "Some issues relating to the monitor model". Washington, DC. Krashen, S. (1982). “Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition”, University of Southern California. Swain, M. (1993), “The Output Hypothesis” pp. 158 – 163. Swain, M. (1995), “Three functions of output in second language learning”.