Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Biocontainer Material Properties & Utility

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad

Check these out next

1 of 19 Ad

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (18)

More from University of Nevada Cooperative Extension (20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

Biocontainer Material Properties & Utility

  1. 1. National Science Foundation Industry & University Cooperative Research Center Biocontainer Material Properties & Utility Presented by: Jake Behrens
  2. 2. Overview • Materials – Matrices – Fillers – Plasticizer • Formulations • Processing – Extrusion – Injection Molding 2 • Difficulties • Results – Tensile – Crush – Colorant
  3. 3. Polymer Matrices • Must be: – Renewable/bio-based – Preferably degradable – Attainable • PLA • PHA 3
  4. 4. PLA - Overview • Post-process recycled PLA – NatureWorks 3001D 4
  5. 5. PHA • Metabolix Mirel PHA 5 *Image courtesy of Hydal BioTech
  6. 6. Matrix Comparison PLA • Hydrolysis • Cost competitive • Can become brittle • Compostable • Ease of processing 6 PHA • Water insoluble • Expensive/hard to obtain • More durable • Faster degradation • Long crystallization time
  7. 7. Filler Materials • Must be: – Renewable/Bio-based – Increase degradation or strength properties – Easily attainable 7
  8. 8. Filler Materials • Soy Polymer – Developed at ISU – Pre-extruded – High nutrient content • Lignin – Readily available – Many side chemistries • Varies by feedstock 8
  9. 9. Filler Materials • DDGS (Distillers Grains) – Abundant – Inexpensive – Large particle size • BioRes – Modified DDGS (Laurel Biocomposites) – Superior blending to DDGS 9
  10. 10. Plasticizer • Polyethylene glycol – PEG 8000 @ 10% • Decrease process temps – Less denaturing of filler (SPA, BioRes) • Increase flow and process-ability • Co-product of biodiesel production 10
  11. 11. Formulations • PHA-DDGS (80/20) • PLA-Lignin (90/10) • PLA-Soy (60/40) • PLA-BioRes (80/20) • PLA-Soy-BioRes (50/30/20) • PLA-Soy-BioRes (55/35/10) 11
  12. 12. Processing - Extrusion 12
  13. 13. Processing – Injection Molding • Arburg 470C – 165 ton clamping force – 1.5” screw, 8.2 oz shot 13 • Keep residence time short • Fillers can impede flow
  14. 14. NPE 14
  15. 15. Difficulties Overcome • Lack of shear thinning • High injection pressure • PLA + Water • Residence times 15
  16. 16. Results – Tensile Tests • Instron load frame – ASTM D638 tensile test – Type I dogbone 16
  17. 17. Results – Crush Tests • Instron load frame – Compressive mode – Two steel plates compress pots – Horizontal (left) and vertical (right) 17
  18. 18. Results – Effect of Colorant • Effect of 1% petroleum- based green colorant 18
  19. 19. Conclusions • Avoid moisture • Decrease process temps (plasticizer) • Colorant aids appearance & strength • Filler content & strength inversely proportional – Affects growth 19

×