Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to Symphony of Science and Practice: Bringing evidence to bear for land restoration practice and policy in Africa(20)

Advertisement

More from Global Landscapes Forum (GLF)(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

Symphony of Science and Practice: Bringing evidence to bear for land restoration practice and policy in Africa

  1. Regreening Africa Team Symphony of Science and Practice: Bringing evidence to bear for land restoration practice and policy in Africa www.regreeningafrica.com
  2. Slido Poll. web address, event code and session room name to be added Where are you joining from? What is your experience of the effectiveness of science, practice and policy working together?
  3. Questions guiding the session 1. What are the most promising ways of melding multiple tools and approaches to deliver, support and monitor restoration? 2. How can we better integrate science, practice and policy to scale up impactful restoration interventions across Africa’s drylands? 3. How can science more effectively share evidence with stakeholders to boost their ability to take better and more inclusive land restoration decisions?
  4. Session outline
  5. Mieke Bourne Regreening Africa Programme Manager
  6. Land degradation is affecting 3.2 billion people globally (IPBES, 2018) Over 65% of Africa’s agricultural land is degraded Africa context
  7. Action 6 in the Strategy: invest in research “Scientific understanding of how to restore and adapt ecosystems is still developing. Considerable investments are needed to identify the best practices to restore our planet – one plot at a time.” An urgent need to understand best practices
  8. Challenge Why is evidence, brought from research, monitoring, community and other stakeholders not well integrated into practice and policy to achieve large scale restoration success?
  9. What is needed Generation of appropriate, actionable and robust evidence Evidence that is easy to interpret, timely and readily accessible Structured stakeholder engagement, which enhances integration of evidence in planning, implementation and policy
  10. Research In Development – scaling context based action research Integrating research into implementation while providing realtime feedback from and with farmers, development partners and policy makers
  11. Regreening Africa – an example of a research in development programme approach
  12. Regreening Africa 500,000 households, across 1 million hectares in eight countries in Sub- Saharan Africa. By incorporating trees into croplands, communal lands and pastoral areas, regreening efforts make it possible to restore Africa’s degraded landscapes.
  13. A unique programme structure
  14. Restoration practices and reach by September 2020 Senegal 29,707 Households reached 64,097 Hectares achieved Mali 38,090 Households reached 81,675 Hectares achieved Ghana 24,898 Households reached 53,891 Hectares achieved Niger 30,744 Households reached 55,092 Hectares achieved Key Nursey FMNR Soil & water conservation Tree Planting Rwanda 40,998 Households reached 36,573 Hectares achieved Kenya 17,868 Households reached 19,129 Hectares achieved Somalia 6,834 Households reached 3,058 Hectares achieved Ethiopia 98,823 Households reached 105,825 Hectares achieved 421,659 hectares 291,378 households
  15. Multiple evidence sources to inform restoration practice
  16. Niger FMNR/ANR Decree Kenya Agroforestry Strategy Kenya supported National Restoration Conference Ethiopia Watershed and Agroforestry Multi-stakeholder platform and agroforestry strategy supported Free-grazing focus Rwanda Agroforestry Taskforce operationalisation Mali Bring lessons from Niger on the FMNR decree Somalia Integrate regreening/ restoration in government programmes and policies Bringing evidence into policy and supporting policy processes across 8 countries Ghana Develop a northern regions restoration plan Senegal Broadcasting of updated forest code Link to Agroecology
  17. Case study Kenya
  18. Case study Niger
  19. Poll 2 What sources of information do you use as evidence in your decision making?
  20. Types of Evidence
  21. Evidence on land health and the Regreening App Tor-G Vågen, Senior Scientist SPACIAL
  22. Integrating uptake survey results Judith Oduol, Senior Agricultural Economist
  23. Uptake Surveys Purpose: Generate evidence on adoption indicators Identify high and low performing areas and regreening practices # of households up taking new regreening practices # of hectares where new regreening practices are being applied 1 2 To inform implementation, management decision making, planning and donor reporting
  24. Lot Quality Assurance Sampling technique Useful in evaluating What do we need? Decision Rule= Threshold Performance of programme areas Performance of interventions 1 2 • Statistically determined Sample size • Households: 19 to 21 per Lot • Desired adoption or exposure rate 67% • High performance if 14/21 or 13/19 households are practising in a Lot
  25. Use of uptake survey results to inform implementation in Rwanda • Direct management attention to low performing areas • Learn lessons from high performing areas
  26. How effective are the scaling models? High rates of uptake among HHs reached High rates of exposure in Rwanda
  27. Identifying and addressing country specific challenges • Low exposure rates- review of scaling approaches • Integration of trees with crops- demonstration plots to demystify beliefs about trees and crops • Low exposure rates • Low levels of achievements against the target- review of implementation strategy • Low tree density- provision of enabling environment for tree planting to diversify regreening practices • Low tree species diversity- Involvement of policy makers to find sustainable solution Kenya Rwanda Senegal
  28. Nursery data application to improve practices Sammy Carsan, Agnes Gachuiri, Grace Koech
  29. Data Needs: Improving Tree Nursery Performance Farmer interests Risks, Inputs, Markets Stakeholder interests Nursery managers capacities Nursery Goals • Livilihoods • Environment • Community
  30. Baseline studies (HH & farm surveys) Focus Group Discussions Nursery surveys Regreening App Germplasm use records Literature reviews Databases Data/Evidence Capture Approaches
  31. • Species prioritization & use asessments: Common species on farms, product demand, indigenouse vs exotics • Diversifying nursery production practices: Diverse seed stocks supply/demos Germplasm sources/exchange support/collaboration • Improving seedling production efficiencies (seeds, media, water, containers, best practice) • Strengthening local seedling supply: technnical, orgaizationa & bussiness skills traings Improving Implementation: Major Focus Areas
  32. Good management practices Quality seed sourcing + Propagation issues Nursery entrepreneurship Pest & disease issues Customized Training Support: local needs & circumstances
  33. An approach to integrate actionable evidence Constance Neely, Lead SHARED Hub
  34. The SHARED Decision Hub is a collective of stakeholder engagement, behavioural specialists and transdisciplinary scientists. The SHARED component works within Regreening Africa to strengthen the linkages across science, practice and policy. Offering tailored facilitation and technical support across the 8 countries, NGO implementors for inclusive, evidence based decision-making. Focuses on relationships, tailored engagement and breaks down the complexity within the programme to sequence these engagements and access to evidence to technically backstop both the implementation learning and policy entry points.
  35. A reflective and learning process to interrogate and integrate these multiple evidence sources into practice and policy With the complex nature of the program, with multiple implementors, 8 country contexts and multiple supporting scientific components a novel engagement process was designed – called the Joint Reflection and Learning meetings JRLM
  36. Implementation update Interactive evidence wall Reflections on scaling and implementation Policy influencing Regreening Africa App Land health surveillance Designing amendments to implementation based on evidence interrogation Field / Implementation experience Using tools such as outcome mapping to clearly articulate target stakeholders for change and process for engagement Practitioners, farmers, scientists, and decision makers work together through structured engagement processes to interrogate and reflect upon evidence and experience to plan for greater impact.
  37. What it takes Willing development and research partners Skilled facilitators structuring and facilitating the dialogue Time and repetition Closing the learning loops
  38. Implementing restoration activities
  39. REVERSING LAND DEGRADATION IN AFRICA BY SCALING-UP EVERGREEN AGRICULTURE (Regreening Africa) Presented by Alex Billy Mugayi, Country project manager World Vision, Rwanda Joint Reflection and Learning (JRL) In land restoration initiatives
  40. Bringing community and NGO perspective to the JRLM What has changed as a result of JRL Bringing research and practice closer together Presentation outline 1 2 3
  41. Bringing community and NGO perspective to the JRLM For World Vision as coordinators of implementation, it is an opportunity to share experience from different districts (contexts) of implementation. For the community, it is an opportunity to share context specific experience. 1 2
  42. What has changed as a result of JRLMs Project team able to look back on annual progress, communities express their gratitude and concerns, the project is reviewed, and a clear roadmap of actions is agreed upon for project success. A common understanding is built for the project team on completed studies and their meaning/contribution to overall project implementation. Alterations are made through a consultative/participatory approach to better achieve project objectives. Government officials can look into the details of the project (with the project team) and its progress to check if it is still aligned to government priorities; and suggest accordingly. This adds to the National Oversight and Coordination Committee. o The planning process has become much more consultative/ participative than before. o Increased ownership and accountability. o Adjust implementation as a result of the process e.g. tree species diversity. o JRL notes and reports are key reference documents for community centered planning. o Alignment with national objectives and targets. o Policy influencing.
  43. Bringing science/research and practice closer together Project scientists go down on the field to see the applicability of their scientific proposals in the communities. Making the science more accessible and demystified to the implementers and the community. Data has been presented to implementing team (NGOs and the community). Farming community gets a unique chance to interact with the scientists on the success and challenges of scientific proposals. Lessons learnt are documented to be capitalized on in subsequent project planning process. Science solving the real problems affecting communities. Appreciation of scientific work and its effective use in solving restoration challenges. An opportunity to develop proposals addressing community challenges. Building evidence which informs future interventions.
  44. GLOBAL LANDSCAPE FORUM (GLF) Présentateur : Mamadou Fotigui Coulibaly, Regreening Africa Manager, Mali, Oxfam REGREENING AFRICA PROJECT MISSION CONJOINTE DE REFLEXION ET D’APPRENTISSAGR (JRLM) 3 Juin 2021
  45. • Mission participative • Recueil d’informations et de données en vue d’améliorer les interventions du projet • Phase terrain et phase de discussions interactives Definition, objectifs, conduite du processus
  46. Xxxxxx xxxxxxxx Importance du JRLM Les JRLM permettent une bonne comprehension des: • Succès; • Opportunités • Defis/Contraintes • Apporte des solutions idoines aux difficultes liées à la pratique des technologies de reverdissement • Renforce la collaboration entre producteurs et chercheurs
  47. Lecons apprises • Les Producteurs Leader Formateurs • Les messages radio
  48. Recommandations • Poursuivre les missions JRLM • Veiller à la mise en oeuvre des recommandations issues des JRLM • Favoriser une collaboration étroite entre Producteurs, chercheurs et agents de Développement
  49. Interactive Discussion
  50. Interactive Discussion What are the biggest limitations to incorporating science into implementation action? What can be done to better integrate science, practice and policy? Please share examples of effective integration of science and development that you know of or have been involved with.
  51. Reflections on scaling Bernard Crabbé Head of the environment mainstreaming & circular economy sector at the European Commission, Directorate General for International Partnerships (INTPA). Alexandru Ghiurca International Partnerships, INTPA F2: Environment, Sustainable Natural Resources
  52. Closing remarks
  53. Visit our website: www.regreeningafrica.org Drop us an email: regreeningafrica@cgiar.org Like our Facebook page: Regreening Africa Follow us on Twitter: @RegreenAfrica Thank You! Merci! Asante!
Advertisement