Defensibility of Workers’ Compensation Claims GA PRIMA Apr2015
1. Gary Jennings, CPCU, ARM, ALCM, AIC, ARe, SCLA
Principal
Strategic Claims Direction LLC
(678) 520-3739 1
2. WC Defensibility
2
#1 topic requested by Georgia PRIMA members
State
Cities
Counties
Risk pools
School districts
Water & sewage authorities
Shared concern regardless of entity
3. WC Defensibility
3
Displeased with outcomes
Mediation
Hearings
Trials
Why are we not getting the desired results?
What can we do to improve the outcomes?
4. WC Defensibility
4
Different program types
Risk Managers, HR Managers, Safety Managers, Finance
Managers, and others
Self-administered or TPA-administered
Contractors and vendors used in different ways
In-house counsel or outside counsel
The issues are the same regardless of your program type,
structure, administration model, or size.
5. WC Defensibility
Why aren’t we getting the desired results?
Common refrains on why we aren’t winning more
cases:
The deck is stacked against us – employees always win
The unions work against us
We have too many employees with entitlement
mentalities
5
6. WC Defensibility
6
Why are we not getting the desired results?
Our supervisors don’t handle it properly
The claims administrator is doing a poor job of
managing the claims
Defense counsel dropped the ball
We will take a broad view of WC defensibility and what we
can do to improve it.
8. WC Defensibility
Defend – Successfully repel attackers
Protect – Maintain safe place for the people
and resources or assets that we value
Justify – Our actions are respected,
supportable, and affirmed
8
10. WC Defensibility
Inherent presumption in this definition is that we and
our employees are all:
Concerned about our employees
Acting in good faith
Following Georgia’s WC requirements
Seeking the most appropriate care for the injured
employee
Trying to eliminate or significantly reduce time off from
work
10
12. WC Fraud
“3 Most Common Types of Workers’ Comp Fraud” -
Claims magazine November 2014
1. Abusers
Outright fraud – injury did not occur at work
2. Opportunists
Injury occurred at work but employee has performance issues,
is uncooperative, and seems to extend time off
3. Forgotten and/or uninformed employees
Not fraudulent but frustrating and eventually may be viewed
unfavorably
12
13. WC Defensibility
13
We spend a lot of our
time on the fewer
claims from ABUSERS
& OPPORTUNISTS
The rest are the claims of
UNINFORMED or
FORGOTTEN EMPLOYEES
that can be reduced
through assertive and
disciplined claims handling
ALL OF THESE CLAIMS CAN GENERATE SIGNIFICANT CLAIMS COSTS
14. Forgotten and/or
Uninformed Employees
Regular people who have lost their way and we suspect
them of fraud / malingering
Unaware of or unclear about requirements
Hurt and in pain
May have other physical problems
Seeing medical providers they don’t know
Don’t understand medical and WC terminology and
procedures
Often get little information from informed sources
Are financially stressed, worried about their jobs/future
May get misleading information and advice from family &
friends
14
16. What do we do?
How do we handle these claims
from different types of employees?
Abusers
Opportunists
Forgotten employees
What can we do about these cases?
16
17. “How do I make time for this?”
17
“I’m already doing a balancing act!”
18. Maybe the better question is:
Will you have more time in
the future to spend on these
issues, and will you get better
results if you don’t change
anything?
18
21. Claims are Hard to Predict
Employers don’t know at the outset which claims will
become the most costly or most difficult to manage
Employers must be consistent
Prepare for assertive claims handling
Adhere strictly to the plans and procedures
Execute all steps with discipline
KNOW WHAT TO DO AT THE RIGHT TIME FOR THE
RIGHT RESULTS
21
22. To be efficient & effective -
Do it right the first time
Create a clear path for claims handling
Make sure the claims are being managed well
Act with a sense of urgency
Ensure that employees get the information they need
Investigate promptly and fully
Evaluate based on objective facts, not favoritism or
politics
Choose your battles
Manage expectations
22
24. Contributing Factors
24
Contributing factors to unsuccessful WC defensibility
Lack of “Leading Industry Practices” – unstated,
inadequate, and/or inefficient claims management
expectations, procedures, and activities
Unclear or undefined roles and responsibilities - roles
of the public entity representatives, the adjusters, the
nurse case managers, the defense attorneys, etc.
Poor execution or follow-through
25. WC Defensibility
Successful defensibility relies upon proper planning
and efficient execution before AND after an incident
occurs. Don’t have a procedural “goose egg” before the
incidents occur.
25
LIFE OF A CLAIMNO
PLANS
26. WC Defensibility
Case may start to unravel before the incident occurs
Lack of notification and knowledge regarding claims
reporting
Inadequate reporting procedures, uninformed or
uncooperative supervisors
Inefficient processes to manage claims once incidents
occur
26
27. WC Defensibility
DISCIPLINE
The difference between a successful defense and an
unsuccessful defense is often due to the difference in the
level of detail
Maintain a strong sense of urgency throughout the life
of a claim
Take decisive steps
Don’t let the claim languish
27
29. Theme: Keep Calm, Sail On
29
To have “happy sailing”
Have a steady captain
Experienced
Committed
Understand the seas ahead
Study & analyze
Learn from past mistakes
Prepare for the voyage
Identify the destination
Create detailed maps and directions
30. Theme: Keep Calm, Sail On
30
To have “happy sailing”
Get the right crew / define your duties
TPA or self-administer?
Qualified personnel
Continuing training
Clear expectations
Chart your course and check it regularly
Compare where you are against known guides
32. Discipline - Pre-Incident
Pre-incident planning and preparation
Hire “right” employees for the jobs
Discharge the “wrong” people
Promote “right” workers to supervisors and managers
Set up prompt reporting processes & methods
Select medical panel & post it
Inform employees of the medical panel
Develop special claims admin. service instructions
Inform employees of reporting responsibilities
32
33. Discipline – Pre-Incident
Pre-incident planning and preparation
Make the right decision – self-administer or use a TPA
Create a Stay at Work / Return to Work (SAW/RTW) program
Select “right” vendors
In-house counsel vs. outside counsel
Managed Care Organizations
Triage Nurses
Medical Bill Review / Re-pricing
Telephonic or Field Case Management
Utilization Review
Durable Medical Equipment
Pharmacy Benefit Management
33
34. Discipline – Pre-Incident
Pre-incident planning and preparation
Select “right” claims system or risk management
information system (RMIS)
Efficient claims operation
Capture key information
Create meaningful reports
Allocate claims costs back to departments
Set up performance measurements for claims
administrator and for departments / divisions
34
35. Discipline – Incident Response
35
Reporting
To the supervisor or designated person
Completing the Supervisor’s Report
Completing the First Report
Getting the report to the TPA
Setting up and assigning the claim
36. Discipline – Incident Response
36
Reporting, set-up, and contact “lag times”
Incident
date
Date EE
reported
to Supv.
Date
Supv.
compl.
invest.
Date
FROI
compl.
(WC-1)
Date sent
to Claims
Admin.
Date
Claims
Admin.
set up /
assigned
Fri.,
3/20
Mon.,
3/23
Tues.,
3/24
Wed.,
3/25
Thu.,
3/26
Fri.,
3/27
Cumulative Days Expired
0 3 4 5 6 7
Possible first contact with employee
37. Discipline – Incident Response
37
Reporting and Initial Contact – if not done promptly,
it may be several days before someone starts managing
the claim.
What are the dangers?
Employee sees unauthorized medical providers
Employee is uncertain and stressed – getting no
direction
Friends & family give misleading advice and information
Witnesses and co-workers may be unavailable / coached
Facts of the claim become murky
Employee may become represented
38. Discipline – Incident Response
38
Investigation
Often one of the biggest weaknesses
Slow to initiate – may be days or weeks after claim occurred
and was reported
Cursory - Adjuster asks “Do you have any reason to doubt this
claim?”
Sometimes performed by unqualified persons – public entity
representatives
Lacks timely follow-up - What’s next?
Sometimes based solely on medical provider’s opinion
Requests medical information late
39. Discipline – Incident Response
39
Investigation - 2 layers
1. Did it happen on the job?
Supervisor
Often more of a cursory effort
Loss Control
What can be done to prevent this in the future?
Claims Administrator
Compensability – Did it arise out of and in the course of
employment (AOE/COE)?
Employer’s simple lack of doubt that the injury occurred is not
the only compensability determinant
Layer 1
Layer 2
40. Discipline – Incident Response
Investigation – some possible questions
Where did it happen? Did it happen at another
company’s site?
Was there evidence at the site?
Was the employee where s/he should have been?
What caused the employee to slip / fall ……?
Does the employee have health conditions that might
have caused this?
Did another employee or contractor play a part?
Did the employee tell others about his/her complaint?
40
41. Discipline – Incident Response
41
Investigation – 2 layers
2. What do we need to know to manage this claim well?
What is the injury, the diagnosis, the prognosis, the
treatment plan, expected time off from work (if any)?
What is the employee’s usual job and can the employee
perform that job – continue to work?
Is this a motivated employee who will do what s/he can to
get appropriate treatment and get back to work?
Layer 1
Layer 2
42. Discipline – Incident Response
42
Investigation – 2 layers
2. What do we need to know to manage this claim well?
Does the employee have any other conditions, injuries,
illnesses, or other circumstances that might delay recovery?
Did the incident occur at another site or in a way that makes
a third party potentially responsible for payment?
Layer 1
Layer 2
43. Compensability Decision
43
Questions to ask yourself
Have you been able to complete the investigation before
the first indemnity payment is due?
Have you investigated the claim fully and promptly?
Are the facts and details clear?
Is the compensability decision clear, or is there room for
interpretation?
When required, can you replicate the information and
facts on which you based the decision?
44. Compensability Decision
Are we accepting and denying the right claims?
If we suspect a claim is not legitimate, how do we
manage the claim until we have the proof?
What do we do if we can’t prove it?
44
45. If Some Aspect of Claim
is Being Contested
45
Should the claim be at this stage in the first place?
Has the claims administrator maintained ongoing
contact?
Has the employee been properly informed throughout
the life of the claim?
If the employee is represented, has the claims
administrator had an ongoing discussion with the
employee’s attorney?
What are the issues?
Should they have been resolved?
If so, why haven’t they been resolved?
46. Defense Counsel Considerations
46
In-house or outside counsel?
Advantages and disadvantages of each?
Managing litigation
Litigation management guidelines
Regular meetings and discussions
Evaluate “success”
Compare return on investment (ROI)
“Success” versus costs
47. Preparing Defense
47
Proper Description of Respective Duties
Claims Administrator Responsibilities
Investigation and Compensability issues should be resolved
Employee’s condition should be well known
Action plan / resolution goals should be well defined
Keep claim moving
Keep defense counsel accountable
48. Preparing Defense
48
Proper Description of Respective Duties
Defense Counsel Responsibilities
Legal advice
Under Claims Administrator’s direction
Perform directed discovery
Inform Claims Administrator of all important developments
Discuss action plans / resolution strategies with Claims
Administrator
“Try” case
49. Make an Early Decision
49
Resolve or Contest?
If Contest
Complete discovery
Obtain needed information
Get it to the hearing quickly
50. Summary - WC Defensibility
50
Better outcomes based on
Consistency
Defining your pre-incident and post-incident
procedures
Clarifying roles and responsibilities
Maintaining a sense of urgency
Executing your plans
51. Questions / Comments?
51
CONTACT INFORMATION
Gary Jennings, CPCU, ARM, ALCM, AIC, ARe, SCLA
(678) 520-3739
Gary.Jennings@StrategicClaimsDirection.com