Virtual Private Server Provider<br />Trade-off analysis<br />Tiago Franco<br />
Agenda<br />Motivation<br />Trade-off method<br />Selection Criteria<br />Scores fragmentation<br />Results<br />Conclusio...
Motivation<br />Select a provider of Virtual Private Server services for production sites <br />
Trade-off method<br />Scoring model<br />Identify several hosting services offering Virtual Private servers<br />Identify ...
Selection Criteria<br />Note: This criteria is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have different criteria...
Scores Fragmentation (1)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have differe...
Scores Fragmentation (2)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have differe...
Scores Fragmentation (3)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have differe...
Scores Fragmentation (4)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have differe...
Scores Fragmentation (5)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have differe...
Scores Fragmentation (6)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have differe...
Scores Fragmentation (7)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have differe...
Scores Fragmentation (8)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have differe...
Scores Fragmentation (9)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have differe...
Results<br />
Conclusions<br />Usually pick one of the top 3<br />DEDIBOX is not a well known provider<br />Gandi the company selected b...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Virtual Private Server Trade-off

870 views

Published on

Trade-off analysis of Virtual Private Server service providers (presented on 27-06-2009 @ Liberdade229).

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

Virtual Private Server Trade-off

  1. 1. Virtual Private Server Provider<br />Trade-off analysis<br />Tiago Franco<br />
  2. 2. Agenda<br />Motivation<br />Trade-off method<br />Selection Criteria<br />Scores fragmentation<br />Results<br />Conclusions<br />
  3. 3. Motivation<br />Select a provider of Virtual Private Server services for production sites <br />
  4. 4. Trade-off method<br />Scoring model<br />Identify several hosting services offering Virtual Private servers<br />Identify several characteristics<br />Assign weight for each one<br />Fragment each characteristic in 5 sections<br />Assign a score for each section<br />Calculate the weighted mean of each service<br />
  5. 5. Selection Criteria<br />Note: This criteria is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have different criteria and weight.<br />
  6. 6. Scores Fragmentation (1)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have different ranges.<br />
  7. 7. Scores Fragmentation (2)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have different ranges.<br />
  8. 8. Scores Fragmentation (3)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have different ranges.<br />
  9. 9. Scores Fragmentation (4)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have different ranges.<br />
  10. 10. Scores Fragmentation (5)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have different ranges.<br />
  11. 11. Scores Fragmentation (6)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have different ranges.<br />
  12. 12. Scores Fragmentation (7)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have different ranges.<br />
  13. 13. Scores Fragmentation (8)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have different ranges.<br />
  14. 14. Scores Fragmentation (9)<br />Note: This fragmentation is according to the author’s needs.<br />Your case may have different ranges.<br />
  15. 15. Results<br />
  16. 16. Conclusions<br />Usually pick one of the top 3<br />DEDIBOX is not a well known provider<br />Gandi the company selected by the author for a test-drive<br />SliceHost is 4th<br />Users of SliceHost, that agree with the criteria and score fragmentation, are not advised to migrate <br />the cost of change can be higher than the benefit)<br />

×