A Summary and a Review/Reflection on El Filibusterismo

100,564 views

Published on

This is a summary + review/reflection of the story of Juan Crisostomo Ibarra turned Simoun in El Filibusterismo

Published in: Education
2 Comments
39 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • I had to write a dissertation proposal for a grad school entrepreneurship teacher. I had no idea how to do that and frankly I was too afraid to ask. There was a great article on how to write a dissertation proposal on Digitalessay.net. In that article it offered an alternative solution of just ordering an essay online and that’s what I did. My grad teacher said I had the best proposal in the seminar so i’m overjoyed that I took this opportunity to order an essay online.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • thanks for the summary...and ur own reflection sa novel na ito..i learned something
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total views
100,564
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
329
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
2
Likes
39
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

A Summary and a Review/Reflection on El Filibusterismo

  1. 1. El Filibusterismo Summary Crisostomo Ibarra is back and as Simoun. During the period in between the story line of Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo which is 13 years, Ibarra left the Philippines and became a wealthy jeweler. He came back to the Philippines as Senor Simoun, disguised with a beard. He seems to have long abandoned his once vision of ending the despotism of Spain with words and peace. He becomes hungry for vengeance for all the misfortune our country has suffered under the tyranny of the Spaniards . And near the end of the novel, when he discovers that his lover, Maria Clara, died in the convent, he becomes all the more furious. Simoun is a confidant of the Captain-General. He encourages the government to make bad decisions and to abuse their power so that it would spark a revolution among the masses. Basilio, now all grown up, is at first reluctant to join in on Simoun’s idea but ends up being part of the plan. Simoun started planning uprisings and stashed guns in the shop of an ally. At the wedding reception of newlyweds (the bride being the ex-girlfriend of one of the friends of Basillo—Isagani), Simoun tells Basilio that his plan was to conceal an explosive which contains nitroglycerin inside a pomegranate-styled Kerosene lamp that Simoun will give to the newlyweds as a gift during the wedding reception. The reception will take place at the former home of the late Captain Tiago, which was now filled with explosives planted by Simoun. According to Simoun, the lamp will stay lighted for only 20 minutes before it flickers; if someone attempts to turn the wick, it will explode and kill everyone—important members of civil society and the Church hierarchy—inside the house. Simoun leaves the reception early and leaves a note with the words: “Mene Thecel Phares” which means “the future is predetermined” and is generally implied that a bad event is going to happen. Simoun signed it with his real name “Juan Crisostomo Ibarra”. The people at the reception were shocked because Ibarra is supposedly dead. One of the priests who knew Ibarra before the ending of Noli Me Tangere confirmed to the people that it was the writing of Ibarra. The lamp started to dim… Outside the house, Basilio was about to walk away because he knew the lamp was going to explode anytime soon when he saw Isagani, the still heart-broken ex-boyfriend of the bride whose reception was still going on in the house of Capitan Tiago. Isagani said that he just wanted to congratulate the newly-weds. Basilio who then feared for the safety of his friend told him about the plan of Simoun. Isagani ran to the house. A priest was about to fix the lamp but once Isagani got in, he found the lamp and threw it out the window into the river outside the residence. Since the guards were chasing Isagani, he himself jumped out of the window into the river as well. There was an
  2. 2. uprising planned by Simoun during the time of the reception. The band got caught and confessed that Simoun lead them. Ibarra was now wanted both as himself and as Simoun. Days passed and a good priest found Simoun walking along the shore, wounded and weak. The noble priest tended to Simoun while the latter explained that he is Ibarra and that he was greatly saddened and angry due to the failure of the revolution and that he was questioning God as to why he was the one who is suffering and not the ones who have forsaken the people of the Philippines. The priest explains that all punishments will come in due time. Ibarra died as he weakly held the hand of the priest. The latter blessed the former and threw away all the remaining jewels of Ibarra in the hopes that they may always be used for good. Review/Reflection: Everyone agrees on the fact that El Filibusterismo is far more dark and brutal that Noli Me Tangere. With many events of murder, sexual abuse and suicide, El Filibusterismo is a massive turning point not only for the plot but also for the characters. Crisostomo Ibarra really did grow as a character in this book. He is obviously not the idealistic and open man he was once before. He became vengeful, angry and in somewhat way, cunning. And in my opinion, this transformation of his is very much human and real. After everything he went through in Noli Me Tangere, it seems only fitting that he becomes the man who is Simoun. I believe that when Ibarra went under alias Simoun, he did not just strip himself of his birth name but he stripped himself of all of what was left of Juan Crisostomo Ibarra. The way I see it, is that Ibarra is not Simoun and Simoun is not Ibarra. They may share the same face, but if we are not speaking about physical attributes, then the only thing they truly did have in common was love for the dear Maria Clara. But besides that, they do not share the same mind, the same plans, the same soul, the same heart. In terms of moral lesson, El Filibusterismo is what I’d choose over Noli Me Tangere. El Filibusterismo showed us how anger and vengeance can take over a person’s being. I also find very much delight in the conversation between Ibarra and Father Florentino: As Ibarra asked on his death bed, “But how come He [God] had not punished those whose evil surpasses mine?” The priest said, “Do not blame him, His [God’s] punishments are meted out all in their due time!” We all want to do good. We all want to be righteous people who choose what is right over
  3. 3. what is wrong. But it is just so tiring being the good person. So sometimes, when misfortune comes our way, we just find ourselves asking the heavens: “Why, oh why me, God?! Have I not done enough good? Aren’t there others who deserve this more?” But like what Father Florentino said, all punishments for all people will come when the time is right. Being a good person is rewarding. Not entirely in the sense of blessings but in the sense that you know that you did what is good and your heart just feels ever so light. This is the stage that Ibarra underwent in the first book. But in the second book, he was just so tired that he ended up being a person who he most likely, never wanted to be. At the end of the book, I believe he ended up being the man we started with. He seemed to have no anger, he seemed to be in a state of peace. I believe that doing your best to never tire in doing good is one of the central themes of the book. El Filibusterismo also shares the theme that ‘violence is not the answer’ with Noli Me Tangere. Simoun’s grand plan thwarted. When he asked Father Florentino about this, the friar answered with, “Perhaps He [God] saw there was no justice in the way you wanted it done.” If you don’t remember, the way Simoun ‘wanted it done’ was by blowing up the house of the late Capitan Tiago which had many Spaniards with important positions in said house with dynamite. It doesn’t seem to have justice after all. Somebody may counter this thought with “But the Spaniards were abusive!” but when you think of it, would we really want to stoop down to that level of violence and rage? I think not. El Filibusterismo is an exciting and raw book and I do plan on reading it again soon.

×