Workshop on Flood management in a transboundary context, 13-14.12.2011, Martina Jankovic

405 views

Published on

Flood Management Experiences in Serbia
Capacity Building Workshop on “Flood management in a transboundary context”, 13-14.12.2011, Zagreb, Croatia

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
405
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Workshop on Flood management in a transboundary context, 13-14.12.2011, Martina Jankovic

  1. 1. “Flood management in a transboundary context” Zagreb, 13th to 14th December 2011FLOOD MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCES IN SERBIA MARTINA JANKOVIC PUBLIC WATER MANAGEMNET COMPANY “SRBIJAVODE”
  2. 2. MARTINA WILL TALK ABOUT :•HYDROLOGICAL SITUATION AND FLOODS INSERBIA IN THE PERIOD FEBRUARY - MAY2006•CURRENT SITUATION OF OBJECT FORPROTECTION•FLOOD ON THE RIVER DANUBE IN APRIL2006: DEFENSE OF CITIES IN COASTAL•EFFECTS OF DEFENSE CONDUCTED BYFLOOD•EXAMPLES OF ACTIVE ROLE PWMC"SRBIJAVODE" IN ORGANIZED ANDIMPLEMENTATION OF FLOOD DEFENCE•CONCLUSIONS
  3. 3. “Flood management in a transboundary context” Zagreb, 13th to 14th December 2011 HYDROLOGICAL SITUATION AND FLOODS IN SERBIA IN THE PERIOD FEBRUARY - MAY 200615th February - 15 March 2006 THE EXTRAORDINARY INCREASE IN THE FLOW OF WATERWAYS IN SERBIA IN FEBRUARY 2006 RESULT IS THE MOST UNFAVORABLE COINCIDENCE OF HYDROLOGICAL FACTORS ON ALMOST EVERY RIVER BASIN IN CONDITIONS OF HIGH SOIL HUMIDITY, HIGH GROUNDWATER MULTI- LEVEL, MULTI-DAY RAINFALL ,EXTRA SATURATED THE SOIL, SO THAT THE RAIN TURNED INTO A RUNOFF. Defense Measures have been introduced in almost all regulated parts Coastal flooding regulated parts are not happen Flooding and damage were recorded in the coastal unregulated areas with no possibility of drainage
  4. 4. ХИДРОЛОШКА СИТУАЦИЈА И ПОПЛАВЕ У СРБИЈИ У FLOODED AGRICULTURAL AREA ПЕРИОДУ ФЕБРУАР - МАЈ 2006
  5. 5. ХИДРОЛОШКА СИТУАЦИЈА И ПОПЛАВЕ У СРБИЈИ У ПЕРИОДУ ФЕБРУАР - МАЈ 2006 FLOOD IN REGULATED PART OF RIVER
  6. 6. “Flood management in a transboundary context” Zagreb, 13th to 14th December 2011 HYDROLOGICAL SITUATION AND FLOODS IN SERBIA IN THE PERIOD FEBRUARY - MAY 200615th March - 17 April 2006 2006., After 15 March, 2006., was recorded new increase in the flow with the upstream parts of the Danube River Basin and the dominant Velika tributaries: the River Sava, Tisa, Tamis, Velika Morava. 17.April In the period from 10. to 17.April 2006, recorded the historical maximum water levels on the Danube river in the area of all cities
  7. 7. 1000 H [mm] Water lavel on Danube river 960 958 13.03. - 05.05. 954 946 948 940 937 936 924 920 920 920 920 912900 2006 890 902 904 892 880 874 870 860 858 860 854 850 848 850 846 845 842 842 840 842 838 837 836 831 832 828 828 826 824 820 820 820 822 820 820 820 814 812 810 808 802 806 804800 796 797 790 792 790 790 790 790 790 786 780 780 780 780 780 780 780 782 783 780 774 778 777 777 779 775 776 770 770 770 770 770 770 770 770 770 772 772 770 772 772 771 772 770 767 769 765 765 762 763 762 762 760 760 760 760 760 760 758 760 756 750 753 750 750 750 749 750 750 744 743 744 742 736 736 738 738 734 732 720 721 723 723 715 718 710 710 706 706700 702 700 700 696 698 694 690 690 690 686 680 680 680 680 684 684 680 680 674 668 670 670 670 670 670 670 670 670 670 670 655 660 663 660 660 660 656 660 664 658 660 Zemun 650 650 648 644 640 638 622 624 624 622 624 634 636 Pančevo 618 618 620 620 614 616 616 614 614 614 608 610 606600 594 600 592 590 602 596 Smederevo 584 582 576 566 566 558 572 V.Gradište 556 546 548 538 540 540 530 531 534 535 534 533 528 532 526 526 537 Golubac 522 525 523 522 521 521 519 519 520 520 516 510 508500 491 490 475 470 T [dan]400 13.03 14.03 15.03 16.03 17.03 18.03 19.03 20.03 21.03 22.03 23.03 24.03 25.03 26.03 27.03 28.03 29.03 30.03 31.03 01.04 02.04 03.04 04.04 05.04 06.04 07.04 08.04 09.04 10.04 11.04 12.04 13.04 14.04 15.04 16.04 17.04 18.04 19.04 20.04 21.04 22.04 23.04 24.04 25.04 26.04 27.04 28.04 29.04 30.04 01.05 02.05 03.05
  8. 8. 110 0 H [mm] Water lavel on Sava river 13.03. - 05.05.10 0 0 10 0 210 0 2 986 970 974 964 960 2006 Jamena 950 930 934 928 S.Mitrovica 920 9 16 9 12 900 900 898 900 892 892 892 Šabac 888 888 886 886 880 880 878 870 868 870 870 868 870 870 862 856 866 854 862 866 862 Beograd 840 838 836 832 830 826 8 12 804 800 798 788 780 737 737 734 734 730 725 726 726 725 724 720 713 715 706 700 702 697 688 686 674 675 668 662 663 658 655 654 654 649 649 643 642 645 639 640 635 633 628 631 626 6 18 6 19 6 15 6 14 6 12 610 609 606 604 606 600 602 600 596 594 590 590 591 5 9 2 5 98 8 5 0 592 592 594 584 584 578 575 578 570 570 565 566 565 566 558 555 556 558 560 550 550 551 552 552 555 541 531 523 5 14 5 11 5 1 5 5 13 5 13 5 11 509 507 504 505 505 504 502 502 500 495 495 493 496 498 497 493 495 492 490 490 492 488 490 491 486 486 486 482 480 480 478 478 476 475 475 475 476 473 465 465 466 464 460 456 460 452 453 455 4 4 86 450 44 446 441 442 442 434 432 434 428 428 424 422 4 18 409 T [dan] 400
  9. 9. CURRENT SITUATION OF FLOOD PROTECTION SYTEMSThe level of development:The waterways in the protected coastal area where PWMC "Srbijavode"implement flood protection are protects about 1.1 million ha of land,numbers of sttlements, industrial object and infrastructureIn Serbia a large number of waterways are not regulated, and present thecomplexes without the possibility of land drainage: these areas are unavoidablyin dangerProblems:Problems:Cities in the coastal regions major rivers are not protected by the degree ofprotection provided, with a high risk of damage due to flooding (Belgrade,Smederevo, Veliko Gradište, Golubac, Kucevo, Petrovac .....)A large number of protective systems not been created as a protection entity
  10. 10. EXISTING STATE OF PROTECTION SYSTEMS 1981 2006
  11. 11. FLOOD ON THE RIVER DANUBE IN APRIL 2006: DEFENSE OF CITIES IN COASTALPREVENTIVE MEASURES:Control of preparedness of protective systems: evidence of “weak spote”Control and operational preparedness observational service water managementcompanySupply and filling new equipment and materials for defenseEstablishing lines of cooperation, coordination and subordination to the services:RHMS,Directorate of Defense: Centers for informing and warning the public,headquarters for flood protection at the local level,systems: HP "Iron Gate",Informing the public
  12. 12. FLOOD ON THE RIVER DANUBE IN APRIL 2006: DEFENSE OF CITIES IN COASTALORDINARY AND EXTRAORDINARY MEASURES OF DEFENCE: RHMS Service 4th April announce the formation of the flood wave on Danube river PWMC "Srbijavode" 7th April formed operational headquarters for flood The risk of flooding announced general public and the staffs of the cities on the coast. Measures on a regular defense Sava river, Velika Morava and Danube have been introduced in mid-March. Extraordinary defense measures were introduced on the River Danube and Sava 8th April The state of emergency was introduced on 13th April in the most affected cities in the coastal river Danube: Golubac, Veliko Gradiste and Smederevo
  13. 13. BELGRADE
  14. 14. BELGRADE
  15. 15. 22.03.2006ZEMUN10.04.06.
  16. 16. 22.03.2006 ZEMUN10.04.06.
  17. 17. SMEDEREVO 10.04.06.
  18. 18. SMEDEREVO 10.04.06.
  19. 19. SMEDEREVO 10.04.06.
  20. 20. VELIKO GRADISTE 10.04.06.
  21. 21. VELIKO GRADISTE 10.04.06.
  22. 22. VELIKO GRADISTE 10.04.06.
  23. 23. GOLUBAC 10.04.06.
  24. 24. GOLUBAC 10.04.06.
  25. 25. GOLUBAC 10.04.06.
  26. 26. GOLUBAC 10.04.06.
  27. 27. EXAMPLES OF ACTIVE ROLE PWMC "SRBIJAVODE" INORGANIZED AND IMPLEMENTATION OF FLOOD DEFENCEProtection priorities:Urban areas, population and the most valuable property:industrial complexes, developed agricultural areas,cultural monumentsResponsibilities the service PWMC:Urgent raising defensive line on the shores of all coastalcities to the announced levels, with the involvement ofthe available machines.Operational cooperation with the staffs at the local leveland direct cooperation with representatives of theDepartment of Defense.Providing emergency dynamics of production anddistribution of materials for defense, according to theneeds of the area
  28. 28. BELGRADE
  29. 29. BELGRADE
  30. 30. ZEMUN
  31. 31. ZEMUN
  32. 32. 1000 H [mm] Vodomer na Dunavu Smederevo "0" 65,36mnm Nivo red. odb 900 Nivo van. odb Max "845" 16.04.06 842 845 842 838 831 832 828 828 826 822 820 814 808 806 800 797 790 786 778 776 772 760 762 744 736 738 715 "700" - od 08.04. 700 698 684 670 660 664 656 648 644 638 634 "600" - od 14.03, 622 624 624 622 618 624 614 616 616 614 618 614 614 608 600 600 594 500 400 T [dan] 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 01 02 03
  33. 33. SMEDEREVO
  34. 34. SMEDEREVO
  35. 35. СМЕДЕРЕВО
  36. 36. СМЕДЕРЕВО
  37. 37. SMEDEREVO
  38. 38. 1000 H [mm] Vodomer na Dunavu Max "960" 15.04.06 V. Gradište "0" 62,17mnm 946 960 958 954 948 940 937 936 Nivo red. odb 920 920 920 924 920 Nivo van. odb 912 902 904900 890 892 880 874 870 860 850 850 842 820 "800" - od 07.04. 810800 796 790 790 790 790 780 780 780 780 780 780 770 770 770 770 770 770 770 770 770 760 760 760 750 750700600500 T [dan]400 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 01 02 03
  39. 39. VELIKO GRADISTE:BEGINING OF BULDING DEFENSE LINE
  40. 40. VELIKO GRADISTE:FORMED DEFENSE LINE
  41. 41. VELIKO GRADISTE:BEGINIG OF BULDING DEFENSE LINE
  42. 42. VELIKO GRADISTE:FORMED DEFENSE LINE
  43. 43. 1000 H [mm] Vodomer na Dunavu Golubac Nivo red. odb Nivo van. odb900 860 858 854 846 848 840 837 836 824 820 820 820 820 812 802 804800 790 792 780 774 770 760 750 750 742 "700" - od 07.04. 720 710700 696 690 690 680 680 680 680 668 670 670 670 670 670 670 670 670 670 660 663 660 660 660 655 650 650600500 T [dan]400 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 01 02 03
  44. 44. GOLUBAC :BRGINIG OF BULDING DEFENSE LINE
  45. 45. GOLUBAC :BEGINIG OF BULDING DEFENSE LINE
  46. 46. GOLUBAC :BEGINIG OF BULDING DEFENSE LINE
  47. 47. GOLUBAC :FORMED SECOND DEFENSE LINE
  48. 48. GOLUBAC:DEFENSE LINES
  49. 49. EFFECTS OF FLOOD DEFENSE IMPLEMENTED DURING FEBRUARY - MAY 2006Defense of major cities in the coastal rivers Danube and Sava, hassuccessfully implemented and achieved near maximum water levels,which were higher and up to 0.50 m of the highest recorded in 1981. ,when the floods caused severe damage,No record of temporary defensive line spilling the protective objects,Formation of defensive line is made ​rationally, with a minimuminvestmentIn the defense, effectively and quickly, were carried out emergency worksto repair the damage to coastlines in the Velika Morava, Mlava, Pek,which are at a low investment prevented a large-scale damage.

×