PRIOR ART SEARCHES

PRIOR ART SEARCHES
1. PATENTABILITY SEARCHES
 To identify prior art references that may be disclosing an
invention as described in an invention disclosure
form/document.
 TYPES OF REFERENCES: Granted Patents, Published Patent
Applications, Research Papers, Blogs, Press Releases, Publicly
Available Audiovisual Content (For Example Through Video
Libraries And Online Content), Products, Services, Product
Specifications, Service Descriptions, and Books.
 DATE RESTRICTION: NONE (All the publicly available references
on the date of initiating of the search).
1. PATENTABILITY SEARCHES - METHODOLOGY
 Identify constructional, operational, and functional elements of
the invention.
 Identify keywords from invention disclosure.
 Identify applicable patent classifications – COOPERATIVE PATENT
CLASSIFICATION (CPC), INTERNATIONAL PATENT
CLASSIFICATION (IPC), UNITED STATES PATENT CLASSIFICATION
(USPC).
 Generate search strings and run the search strings on free
databases (PATENTSCOPE, ESPACENET, GOOGLE PATENTS, LENS,
FREEPATENTSONLINE, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, GOOGLE BOOKS,
YOUTUBE, GOOGLE.COM) and paid databases (QUESTEL ORBIT,
DERWENT INNOVATION).
1. PATENTABILITY SEARCHES – NOVELTY AND
INVENTIVE STEP/OBVIOUSNESS ASPECTS
 NOVELTY – All the identified constructional, operational, and
functional elements of the invention are available through a single
reference or a group of documents acting as a single reference (For
example: a research paper citing other research papers forms a group
containing the research paper and the other cited research papers
acting as a single reference).
 INVENTIVE STEP/OBVIOUSNESS – All the identified constructional,
operational, and functional elements of the invention are available by
combining two or more references belonging to the same field of
invention or serving the same purpose as the invention disclosed in
invention disclosure.
2. INVALIDITY SEARCHES
 To identify prior art references that may be disclosing an invention as claimed in
a claim of a patent application or a granted patent.
 TYPES OF REFERENCES: Granted Patents, Published Patent Applications, Research
Papers, Blogs, Press Releases, Publicly Available Audiovisual Content (For Example
Through Video Libraries And Online Content), Products, Services, Product
Specifications, Service Descriptions, and Books
 DATE RESTRICTION: (1) All references publicly available before the priority date
of the claim under study, (2) All patent applications and granted patents filed
before but published after the priority date in the same jurisdiction as the
patent claim (for example, a claim filed and/or granted in Europe will be
invalidated by a paten application or a granted patent that was filed with
European Patent Office before but published after the priority date of the claim).
2. INVALIFDITY SEARCHES - METHODOLOGY
 Identify constructional, operational, and functional elements of
the claim(s) under study.
 Identify keywords from invention disclosure.
 Identify applicable patent classifications – COOPERATIVE PATENT
CLASSIFICATION (CPC), INTERNATIONAL PATENT
CLASSIFICATION (IPC), UNITED STATES PATENT CLASSIFICATION
(USPC)
 Generate search strings and run the search strings on free
databases (PATENTSCOPE, ESPACENET, GOOGLE PATENTS, LENS,
FREEPATENTSONLINE, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, GOOGLE BOOKS,
YOUTUBE, GOOGLE.COM) and paid databases (QUESTEL ORBIT,
DERWENT INNOVATION).
2. INVALIDITY SEARCHES – NOVELTY AND
INVENTIVE STEP/OBVIOUSNESS ASPECTS
 NOVELTY – All the identified constructional, operational, and
functional elements of the claims are available through a single
reference or a group of documents acting as a single reference (For
example: a research paper citing other research papers forms a group
containing the research paper and the other cited research papers
acting as a single reference).
 INVENTIVE STEP/OBVIOUSNESS – All the identified constructional,
operational, and functional elements of the claims are available by
combining two or more references belonging to the same field of
invention or serving the same purpose as the invention disclosed in
invention disclosure.
3. FREEDOM TO OPERATE (FTO) SEARCHES
 To identify granted patents and live patent applications that a given product
is liable to infringe if launched in a given jurisdiction (for example, India,
Europe, United States). The product may be a good or a service.
 TYPES OF REFERENCES: Granted Patents and Published Patent Applications
filed within the same jurisdiction. Published PCT international applications
with priority date within forty (40) months of the date of the performance of
search.
 DATE RESTRICTION: All patent applications and granted patents with priority
date within twenty-one (21) years (additional one year to account for patent
term adjustment) of the date of the performance of search.
3. FTO SEARCHES - METHODOLOGY
 Identify constructional, operational, and functional elements of the
product under study.
 Identify and/or generate keywords.
 Identify applicable patent classifications – COOPERATIVE PATENT
CLASSIFICATION (CPC), INTERNATIONAL PATENT CLASSIFICATION (IPC),
UNITED STATES PATENT CLASSIFICATION (USPC)
 Generate search strings and run the search strings on free databases
(PATENTSCOPE, ESPACENET, GOOGLE PATENTS, LENS) and paid databases
(QUESTEL ORBIT, DERWENT INNOVATION).
 Compare the constructional, operational, and functional elements of the
product for their presence in claims of the patent documents identified.
3. FTO SEARCHES – CLAIM INFRINGEMENT
 For a claim to be infringed, all of the elements of the claim should be
available in the product and not the other way round. That is even if a
product has additional elements to those recited in the claim, the claim
would still be infringed if the product has each one of the elements recited
in the claim.
 Check the formal validity of the identified claims (for example, application
abandoned, maintenance fee not paid, the patent document belonging to
the same owner as the product etc.)
 Check substantial validity of the identified claims (if any other patent
document(s) uncovered during the search invalidates the identified claims
through novelty and/or inventive step aspect). If required run a secondary
invalidity search for the most relevant claims.
4. INFRINGEMENT SEARCHES
 To identify products (goods and services) that are infringing upon given
subject patent claim(s) in a given jurisdiction (for example, India, Europe,
United States).
 TYPES OF REFERENCES: Product literature, brochures, pamphlets, product
specifications, press releases, user manuals etc.
 DATE RESTRICTION: All products launched in the given jurisdiction on or
after the priority date of the subject patent claims.
4. INFRINGEMENT SEARCHES - METHODOLOGY
 Identify constructional, operational, and functional elements of the claims
under study.
 Identify and/or generate keywords.
 Generate search strings and run the search strings on open web Google,
Bing, Bard, ChatGPT, etc.
 Compare the constructional, operational, and functional elements of the
claims for their presence in the product literature extracted from the search.
*NOTE: Here again for a claim to be infringed, each one of the constructional,
operational, and functional elements of the claim should be present in the
product.
5. STATE OF THE ART SEARCH AND LANDSCAPE
ANALYSIS
 To identify research and development ongoing in the given technical field or
being performed by a given organization.
 TYPES OF REFERENCES: Granted Patents, Published Patent Applications,
Research Papers, Blogs, Press Releases, Publicly Available Audiovisual
Content (For Example Through Video Libraries And Online Content),
Products, Services, Product Specifications, Service Descriptions, and Books.
 DATE RESTRICTION: All literature available as per the given timeline (for
example, in last 10 years, 5 years, since the inception of a company etc.).
5. STATE OF THE ART SEARCH AND LANDSCAPE
ANALYSIS
 Identify and/or generate keywords based on the technical field or name of
the company. If the company is a conglomerate, entire list of all the
holdings would need to be identified
 Identify applicable patent classifications – COOPERATIVE PATENT
CLASSIFICATION (CPC), INTERNATIONAL PATENT CLASSIFICATION (IPC),
UNITED STATES PATENT CLASSIFICATION (USPC)
 Generate search strings and run the search strings on free databases
(PATENTSCOPE, ESPACENET, GOOGLE PATENTS, LENS,
FREEPATENTSONLINE, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, GOOGLE BOOKS, YOUTUBE,
GOOGLE.COM) and paid databases (QUESTEL ORBIT, DERWENT
INNOVATION).
5. STATE OF THE ART SEARCH AND LANDSCAPE
ANALYSIS - REPORTING
 Identify technical terms and phrases in the retrieved documents.
 Categorize the technical terms and phrases in several cascading categories.
 Identify timewise development of the technology identified from the
technical terms and phrases (monthly, quarterly, yearly, etc.)
 Identify most cited assignees and inventors.
 Generate heat maps, bubble charts, pie charts, bar graphs, trendlines etc. to
communicate the results visually.
 Generate an executive summary, summarizing the overall findings of the
search activity.
PRIOR ART SEARCHES
1 of 16

Recommended

2010 Patent Information by
2010 Patent Information2010 Patent Information
2010 Patent Informationsmallhead
1.9K views27 slides
Jipmer ipr 2016_f5 by
Jipmer ipr 2016_f5Jipmer ipr 2016_f5
Jipmer ipr 2016_f5Nikhil Dhar
85 views23 slides
Patent search by Ashok Ram Kumar by
Patent search by Ashok Ram KumarPatent search by Ashok Ram Kumar
Patent search by Ashok Ram Kumartiehyderabad
1.9K views20 slides
Patent search from product specification final by
Patent search from product specification finalPatent search from product specification final
Patent search from product specification finalIIITA
325 views21 slides
RD FTO 2016_F by
RD FTO 2016_FRD FTO 2016_F
RD FTO 2016_FDr. Ravi Dhar
473 views26 slides
Patent search analysis and report by
Patent search analysis and reportPatent search analysis and report
Patent search analysis and reportYash Patel
1.7K views20 slides

More Related Content

Similar to PRIOR ART SEARCHES

Patent database by
Patent databasePatent database
Patent databasePallavi Belkar
20K views36 slides
How To Complete A UK Patent Search by
How To Complete A UK Patent SearchHow To Complete A UK Patent Search
How To Complete A UK Patent SearchWorld Finance Council
9 views3 slides
Patent Searches By Shakeel by
Patent Searches By ShakeelPatent Searches By Shakeel
Patent Searches By Shakeelguest12a5a36
551 views8 slides
Patent Searches By Shakeel by
Patent Searches By ShakeelPatent Searches By Shakeel
Patent Searches By ShakeelMohammed Shakeel Iqbal
312 views8 slides
Patent searching process & ownership rights and transfer by
Patent searching process & ownership rights and transferPatent searching process & ownership rights and transfer
Patent searching process & ownership rights and transferRajalingam Balakrishnan
558 views24 slides
7 Step US Patent Search Strategy Guide Reference via USPTO by
7 Step US Patent Search Strategy Guide Reference via USPTO7 Step US Patent Search Strategy Guide Reference via USPTO
7 Step US Patent Search Strategy Guide Reference via USPTOUSPatentsNMore
950 views7 slides

Similar to PRIOR ART SEARCHES(20)

Patent Searches By Shakeel by guest12a5a36
Patent Searches By ShakeelPatent Searches By Shakeel
Patent Searches By Shakeel
guest12a5a36551 views
7 Step US Patent Search Strategy Guide Reference via USPTO by USPatentsNMore
7 Step US Patent Search Strategy Guide Reference via USPTO7 Step US Patent Search Strategy Guide Reference via USPTO
7 Step US Patent Search Strategy Guide Reference via USPTO
USPatentsNMore950 views
Website based patent information searching mechanism by iaemedu
Website based patent information searching mechanismWebsite based patent information searching mechanism
Website based patent information searching mechanism
iaemedu1.1K views
Patentability Search- Importance and How to Do Patentability Search by TT Consultants
Patentability Search- Importance and How to Do Patentability SearchPatentability Search- Importance and How to Do Patentability Search
Patentability Search- Importance and How to Do Patentability Search
TT Consultants1.4K views
Patent database with one example by Pallavi Belkar
Patent database with one examplePatent database with one example
Patent database with one example
Pallavi Belkar4.1K views
Opportunity Analysis for Generics: Everything You Need To Know by Mamta Agrawal
Opportunity Analysis for Generics: Everything You Need To KnowOpportunity Analysis for Generics: Everything You Need To Know
Opportunity Analysis for Generics: Everything You Need To Know
Mamta Agrawal10 views
Presentation on patent search by tinasingh30
Presentation on patent searchPresentation on patent search
Presentation on patent search
tinasingh3088 views
Patents 101: How to Do a Patent Search by Kristina Gomez
Patents 101: How to Do a Patent SearchPatents 101: How to Do a Patent Search
Patents 101: How to Do a Patent Search
Kristina Gomez9.2K views
Patent Search: An important new test bed for IR by Giovanna Roda
Patent Search: An important new test bed for IRPatent Search: An important new test bed for IR
Patent Search: An important new test bed for IR
Giovanna Roda1.8K views
Iact patent search strategies seminar 8 28-2018 by douglaslyon
Iact patent search strategies seminar 8 28-2018Iact patent search strategies seminar 8 28-2018
Iact patent search strategies seminar 8 28-2018
douglaslyon20 views
patent filing procedure - by Dr. S. Madhuri Paradesi by DrSMadhuriparadesi
patent filing procedure - by Dr. S. Madhuri Paradesi patent filing procedure - by Dr. S. Madhuri Paradesi
patent filing procedure - by Dr. S. Madhuri Paradesi
DrSMadhuriparadesi198 views
Intellectual Property Serrvices Outsourcing- India Company Overview by EPatents IP Services
Intellectual Property Serrvices Outsourcing- India Company OverviewIntellectual Property Serrvices Outsourcing- India Company Overview
Intellectual Property Serrvices Outsourcing- India Company Overview

Recently uploaded

Sangyun Lee, 'Criminal Enforcement of the MRFTA against ASBP in Korea' (Kyoto... by
Sangyun Lee, 'Criminal Enforcement of the MRFTA against ASBP in Korea' (Kyoto...Sangyun Lee, 'Criminal Enforcement of the MRFTA against ASBP in Korea' (Kyoto...
Sangyun Lee, 'Criminal Enforcement of the MRFTA against ASBP in Korea' (Kyoto...Sangyun Lee
7 views16 slides
Indonesia Green Taxonomy: Towards a More Sustainable Financial System by
Indonesia Green Taxonomy: Towards a More Sustainable Financial SystemIndonesia Green Taxonomy: Towards a More Sustainable Financial System
Indonesia Green Taxonomy: Towards a More Sustainable Financial SystemAHRP Law Firm
6 views10 slides
Jackpocket v. Lottomatrix fee petition order.pdf by
Jackpocket v. Lottomatrix fee petition order.pdfJackpocket v. Lottomatrix fee petition order.pdf
Jackpocket v. Lottomatrix fee petition order.pdfMike Keyes
17 views22 slides
Jamaica's Data Protection Act: Compliance required from the business community by
Jamaica's Data Protection Act: Compliance required from the business communityJamaica's Data Protection Act: Compliance required from the business community
Jamaica's Data Protection Act: Compliance required from the business communityEmerson Bryan
13 views13 slides
Women in Law and Politics Journal.pdf Danielle Mikaelian by
Women in Law and Politics Journal.pdf Danielle MikaelianWomen in Law and Politics Journal.pdf Danielle Mikaelian
Women in Law and Politics Journal.pdf Danielle MikaelianDanielleMikaelian
11 views105 slides
Navigating Divorce Law in Ontario: A Practical Guide by
Navigating Divorce Law in Ontario: A Practical GuideNavigating Divorce Law in Ontario: A Practical Guide
Navigating Divorce Law in Ontario: A Practical GuideBTL Law P.C.
7 views16 slides

Recently uploaded(11)

Sangyun Lee, 'Criminal Enforcement of the MRFTA against ASBP in Korea' (Kyoto... by Sangyun Lee
Sangyun Lee, 'Criminal Enforcement of the MRFTA against ASBP in Korea' (Kyoto...Sangyun Lee, 'Criminal Enforcement of the MRFTA against ASBP in Korea' (Kyoto...
Sangyun Lee, 'Criminal Enforcement of the MRFTA against ASBP in Korea' (Kyoto...
Sangyun Lee7 views
Indonesia Green Taxonomy: Towards a More Sustainable Financial System by AHRP Law Firm
Indonesia Green Taxonomy: Towards a More Sustainable Financial SystemIndonesia Green Taxonomy: Towards a More Sustainable Financial System
Indonesia Green Taxonomy: Towards a More Sustainable Financial System
AHRP Law Firm 6 views
Jackpocket v. Lottomatrix fee petition order.pdf by Mike Keyes
Jackpocket v. Lottomatrix fee petition order.pdfJackpocket v. Lottomatrix fee petition order.pdf
Jackpocket v. Lottomatrix fee petition order.pdf
Mike Keyes17 views
Jamaica's Data Protection Act: Compliance required from the business community by Emerson Bryan
Jamaica's Data Protection Act: Compliance required from the business communityJamaica's Data Protection Act: Compliance required from the business community
Jamaica's Data Protection Act: Compliance required from the business community
Emerson Bryan13 views
Women in Law and Politics Journal.pdf Danielle Mikaelian by DanielleMikaelian
Women in Law and Politics Journal.pdf Danielle MikaelianWomen in Law and Politics Journal.pdf Danielle Mikaelian
Women in Law and Politics Journal.pdf Danielle Mikaelian
Navigating Divorce Law in Ontario: A Practical Guide by BTL Law P.C.
Navigating Divorce Law in Ontario: A Practical GuideNavigating Divorce Law in Ontario: A Practical Guide
Navigating Divorce Law in Ontario: A Practical Guide
BTL Law P.C.7 views
Atty. Yebra - Criminal Law - Case Doctrines 07292022.pdf by JonalynBedking
Atty. Yebra - Criminal Law - Case Doctrines 07292022.pdfAtty. Yebra - Criminal Law - Case Doctrines 07292022.pdf
Atty. Yebra - Criminal Law - Case Doctrines 07292022.pdf
JonalynBedking6 views
Religious Freedom, Registration Issues and the Colonial Legacy of State Recog... by Cometan
Religious Freedom, Registration Issues and the Colonial Legacy of State Recog...Religious Freedom, Registration Issues and the Colonial Legacy of State Recog...
Religious Freedom, Registration Issues and the Colonial Legacy of State Recog...
Cometan7 views
Baromètre Women's Forum 2023 by Ipsos France
Baromètre Women's Forum 2023Baromètre Women's Forum 2023
Baromètre Women's Forum 2023
Ipsos France166 views

PRIOR ART SEARCHES

  • 2. 1. PATENTABILITY SEARCHES  To identify prior art references that may be disclosing an invention as described in an invention disclosure form/document.  TYPES OF REFERENCES: Granted Patents, Published Patent Applications, Research Papers, Blogs, Press Releases, Publicly Available Audiovisual Content (For Example Through Video Libraries And Online Content), Products, Services, Product Specifications, Service Descriptions, and Books.  DATE RESTRICTION: NONE (All the publicly available references on the date of initiating of the search).
  • 3. 1. PATENTABILITY SEARCHES - METHODOLOGY  Identify constructional, operational, and functional elements of the invention.  Identify keywords from invention disclosure.  Identify applicable patent classifications – COOPERATIVE PATENT CLASSIFICATION (CPC), INTERNATIONAL PATENT CLASSIFICATION (IPC), UNITED STATES PATENT CLASSIFICATION (USPC).  Generate search strings and run the search strings on free databases (PATENTSCOPE, ESPACENET, GOOGLE PATENTS, LENS, FREEPATENTSONLINE, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, GOOGLE BOOKS, YOUTUBE, GOOGLE.COM) and paid databases (QUESTEL ORBIT, DERWENT INNOVATION).
  • 4. 1. PATENTABILITY SEARCHES – NOVELTY AND INVENTIVE STEP/OBVIOUSNESS ASPECTS  NOVELTY – All the identified constructional, operational, and functional elements of the invention are available through a single reference or a group of documents acting as a single reference (For example: a research paper citing other research papers forms a group containing the research paper and the other cited research papers acting as a single reference).  INVENTIVE STEP/OBVIOUSNESS – All the identified constructional, operational, and functional elements of the invention are available by combining two or more references belonging to the same field of invention or serving the same purpose as the invention disclosed in invention disclosure.
  • 5. 2. INVALIDITY SEARCHES  To identify prior art references that may be disclosing an invention as claimed in a claim of a patent application or a granted patent.  TYPES OF REFERENCES: Granted Patents, Published Patent Applications, Research Papers, Blogs, Press Releases, Publicly Available Audiovisual Content (For Example Through Video Libraries And Online Content), Products, Services, Product Specifications, Service Descriptions, and Books  DATE RESTRICTION: (1) All references publicly available before the priority date of the claim under study, (2) All patent applications and granted patents filed before but published after the priority date in the same jurisdiction as the patent claim (for example, a claim filed and/or granted in Europe will be invalidated by a paten application or a granted patent that was filed with European Patent Office before but published after the priority date of the claim).
  • 6. 2. INVALIFDITY SEARCHES - METHODOLOGY  Identify constructional, operational, and functional elements of the claim(s) under study.  Identify keywords from invention disclosure.  Identify applicable patent classifications – COOPERATIVE PATENT CLASSIFICATION (CPC), INTERNATIONAL PATENT CLASSIFICATION (IPC), UNITED STATES PATENT CLASSIFICATION (USPC)  Generate search strings and run the search strings on free databases (PATENTSCOPE, ESPACENET, GOOGLE PATENTS, LENS, FREEPATENTSONLINE, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, GOOGLE BOOKS, YOUTUBE, GOOGLE.COM) and paid databases (QUESTEL ORBIT, DERWENT INNOVATION).
  • 7. 2. INVALIDITY SEARCHES – NOVELTY AND INVENTIVE STEP/OBVIOUSNESS ASPECTS  NOVELTY – All the identified constructional, operational, and functional elements of the claims are available through a single reference or a group of documents acting as a single reference (For example: a research paper citing other research papers forms a group containing the research paper and the other cited research papers acting as a single reference).  INVENTIVE STEP/OBVIOUSNESS – All the identified constructional, operational, and functional elements of the claims are available by combining two or more references belonging to the same field of invention or serving the same purpose as the invention disclosed in invention disclosure.
  • 8. 3. FREEDOM TO OPERATE (FTO) SEARCHES  To identify granted patents and live patent applications that a given product is liable to infringe if launched in a given jurisdiction (for example, India, Europe, United States). The product may be a good or a service.  TYPES OF REFERENCES: Granted Patents and Published Patent Applications filed within the same jurisdiction. Published PCT international applications with priority date within forty (40) months of the date of the performance of search.  DATE RESTRICTION: All patent applications and granted patents with priority date within twenty-one (21) years (additional one year to account for patent term adjustment) of the date of the performance of search.
  • 9. 3. FTO SEARCHES - METHODOLOGY  Identify constructional, operational, and functional elements of the product under study.  Identify and/or generate keywords.  Identify applicable patent classifications – COOPERATIVE PATENT CLASSIFICATION (CPC), INTERNATIONAL PATENT CLASSIFICATION (IPC), UNITED STATES PATENT CLASSIFICATION (USPC)  Generate search strings and run the search strings on free databases (PATENTSCOPE, ESPACENET, GOOGLE PATENTS, LENS) and paid databases (QUESTEL ORBIT, DERWENT INNOVATION).  Compare the constructional, operational, and functional elements of the product for their presence in claims of the patent documents identified.
  • 10. 3. FTO SEARCHES – CLAIM INFRINGEMENT  For a claim to be infringed, all of the elements of the claim should be available in the product and not the other way round. That is even if a product has additional elements to those recited in the claim, the claim would still be infringed if the product has each one of the elements recited in the claim.  Check the formal validity of the identified claims (for example, application abandoned, maintenance fee not paid, the patent document belonging to the same owner as the product etc.)  Check substantial validity of the identified claims (if any other patent document(s) uncovered during the search invalidates the identified claims through novelty and/or inventive step aspect). If required run a secondary invalidity search for the most relevant claims.
  • 11. 4. INFRINGEMENT SEARCHES  To identify products (goods and services) that are infringing upon given subject patent claim(s) in a given jurisdiction (for example, India, Europe, United States).  TYPES OF REFERENCES: Product literature, brochures, pamphlets, product specifications, press releases, user manuals etc.  DATE RESTRICTION: All products launched in the given jurisdiction on or after the priority date of the subject patent claims.
  • 12. 4. INFRINGEMENT SEARCHES - METHODOLOGY  Identify constructional, operational, and functional elements of the claims under study.  Identify and/or generate keywords.  Generate search strings and run the search strings on open web Google, Bing, Bard, ChatGPT, etc.  Compare the constructional, operational, and functional elements of the claims for their presence in the product literature extracted from the search. *NOTE: Here again for a claim to be infringed, each one of the constructional, operational, and functional elements of the claim should be present in the product.
  • 13. 5. STATE OF THE ART SEARCH AND LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS  To identify research and development ongoing in the given technical field or being performed by a given organization.  TYPES OF REFERENCES: Granted Patents, Published Patent Applications, Research Papers, Blogs, Press Releases, Publicly Available Audiovisual Content (For Example Through Video Libraries And Online Content), Products, Services, Product Specifications, Service Descriptions, and Books.  DATE RESTRICTION: All literature available as per the given timeline (for example, in last 10 years, 5 years, since the inception of a company etc.).
  • 14. 5. STATE OF THE ART SEARCH AND LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS  Identify and/or generate keywords based on the technical field or name of the company. If the company is a conglomerate, entire list of all the holdings would need to be identified  Identify applicable patent classifications – COOPERATIVE PATENT CLASSIFICATION (CPC), INTERNATIONAL PATENT CLASSIFICATION (IPC), UNITED STATES PATENT CLASSIFICATION (USPC)  Generate search strings and run the search strings on free databases (PATENTSCOPE, ESPACENET, GOOGLE PATENTS, LENS, FREEPATENTSONLINE, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, GOOGLE BOOKS, YOUTUBE, GOOGLE.COM) and paid databases (QUESTEL ORBIT, DERWENT INNOVATION).
  • 15. 5. STATE OF THE ART SEARCH AND LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS - REPORTING  Identify technical terms and phrases in the retrieved documents.  Categorize the technical terms and phrases in several cascading categories.  Identify timewise development of the technology identified from the technical terms and phrases (monthly, quarterly, yearly, etc.)  Identify most cited assignees and inventors.  Generate heat maps, bubble charts, pie charts, bar graphs, trendlines etc. to communicate the results visually.  Generate an executive summary, summarizing the overall findings of the search activity.