Panel1 ingrid van niekerk

328 views

Published on

PowerPoint presentations from Fundación Capital's South-South Knowledge Exchange Forum, organized with support from IFAD "Leveraging Opportunities to Encourage Financial Inclusion"

Published in: Business, Economy & Finance
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
328
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • The
  • Panel1 ingrid van niekerk

    1. 1. Fudacion Capital Workshop Johannesburg, 21 June 201221 June 2012Ingrid van Niekerkivanniekerk@epri.org.zaEconomicPolicyResearchInstitute
    2. 2. Social Grants and the role of FinancialInclusion in Social InclusionSocial Inclusion – Developed in 1980’s in social policy debates of French social government • People living on the margins of society without access to social insurance • European Debate - Social Exclusion not just about Poverty - everybody has the right to participate in society and have the opportunity to reach their full potential.
    3. 3. – Social exclusion more than poverty • inadequate rights wrt of housing, and access to services such as education, health and other services ---------------------2.Multiple factors associated with social exclusion3.Dynamic nature assoc. with exclusionary process4.People are denied their social rights5.Policy failure
    4. 4. Key differences between LA andAfricaAfrica -constituted and legislated SP as a basic human right – Policy makers and civil society resist attempts to instrumetalise SPLatin America –Instrumentalist approaches to SPExceptions- Bolivian universal pension, Brazilian Bolsa Familia.
    5. 5. Spanning two continentsLA – Instrumental Approach - SP is an investment in pro-poor and inclusive growth. – Mexico – Opportunidades – programme helps poor families to invest in human capital – family grantAfrica – SP is rooted in anti-poverty programmes with a strong social focus. – South Africa – Child Support Grant – reduce child poverty - individual child grant
    6. 6. Child Support Grant extension toreduce child poverty
    7. 7. The Child Support Grant reduces SouthAfrica’s poverty gap by 38%
    8. 8. Conditional vs UnconditionalPrior 2000 – Most African grants were unconditional and mainly pensions (non- contributory)After 2000 – marked shift to child grants and conditionalitySouth Africa – resisted a punitive conditions – Strong civil society movement – Activists and legal experts
    9. 9. Coverage of Conditional CashTransfers (Source-Fabio Verras)
    10. 10. Financial InclusionGovernments make regular payments to almost 170 million people worldwide.But in most countries only about a ¼ lands in financially inclusive bank accounts. Source: Mireya Almazan, Gates Foundation, Nov 2010 (from CGAP 2009 Focus Note)
    11. 11. G2P Payment approaches andevolution to electronic systemsCash – Have to queue to access physical cashLimited Purpose Account – Often no additional funds may be depositedMainstream Account – Store of funds, ease of access, deposit additional funds (Source: Chris Bold-CGAP)
    12. 12. Traditional Government to personpayments systems (G2P)
    13. 13. South Africa:Sekulula Debit card accounts• Sekulula Debit Card is a basic transaction bank account product targeted specifically at the needs of social grant recipients in South Africa.• Features: • No minimum balance requirement. • SASSA pays $1.50 per month per account; includes two free withdrawals per month at ABSA ATM’s or usage at POS with ABSA merchants • Usable at any other bank ATM for fee or VISA POS• Take-up: More than two-thirds of grant recipients in main province;• ABSA actively cross sells other financial services to its recipient client base;• Accounts are also offered to non-recipient clients as well.• Now phasing outSource: BFA (2006,2008)
    14. 14. Recipient Responses to accountEase of access and convenienceWithdrew money immediately - No savingsMinimal use of the financial instruments
    15. 15. South Africa – easier to transition to concept of financial inclusion – Compel banks through the banking charter – Acting on ensuring people’s rights – Relatively sophisticated banking system • New Technologies easily and quickly embraced • Strong competition amongst the banks
    16. 16. Changes over time towardselectronic payments (CGAP Chris Bold)
    17. 17. Does this mean South Africa is onits way to financial inclusion?Beneficiaries still withdrawing whole grant – 90 day clause ? – don’t need the money ?Government was facing high cost of delivery, lack of control of databaseAppointed New payments service provider (CPS/Grindrod Bank) Combination smartcard, biometric data
    18. 18. Social Protection Plus????Small Pilot on financial inclusion (1500hh)Aim of project: incentivize youth and caregivers to save in a bank account/unit trust fund, encourage high school completion, tertiary education, economic activity.Randomized control trial with two treatments – T1- financial incentive and financial literacy, linked to Fundisa unitrust account. – T2 – in addition career guidance and counselling
    19. 19. Mexico using cross ministerial approachColombia –holding an auction to sell a subsidy to open agents in rural areas.
    20. 20. Points to consider………What role for policy-makers in incentivizing the development of products to financially include recipients of social cash/electronic transfers?Can branchless banking provide a low cost solution to financial inclusion?What role for mobile delivery systems? Tcho- Tcho Mobile wallet system in HaitiWhat role for stimulating competition amongst the providers?
    21. 21. TrueSocially and FinanciallyInclusiveBankAccount

    ×