Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Emergency accommodation   Paths to reception and hospitality              Francesca Santaniello                Politecnico...
The storyFondazione Cariplo : important grantmaker in Italy [Lombardy]supports housing intervention from the fist half of ...
Aims1.• ‘concentration’ [shelters, dormitories..] = no effectiveness:• micro-facilities [local roots/specificity ]2.• focu...
Main features1. Context as a variableOne ‘model’ but different projects : characteristics change!2. Experimental approachT...
Resoureces1. MaterialUnused buildings owned by different actors [Curia, Charities, Foundations…] that  can be given for a ...
2 contexts/2 modelsElements [from context analysis] for ‘models’ porposedMilanContext• Weak [not existent] public policies...
2 contexts/2 modelsElements [from context analysis] for ‘models’ porposedBergamoContext• Strong network public/private par...
Projects and territories1. Analysis and strategiesPolitecnico supports the process [2006/2007]: 2 work groups to definepro...
Different projects for different contextsfour examples [not all of them will be implemented, but will found new funding]1....
Different projects for different contextsfour examples [not all of them will be implemented, but will found new funding]2....
Different projects for different contextsfour examples [not all of them will be implemented, but will found new funding]3....
Different projects for different contextsfour examples [not all of them will be implemented, but will found new funding]4....
Conditions for success[‘system’ perspective]1. Networks already working in an integrate perspective > if not?2. Availabili...
Conditions for success[project perspective]1. Other functions can help local community to develop a   ‘relationship’ with ...
Complementary functions [day/night]
Parallel functions [day/night]
Emergency Accommodation: Paths to Reception and Hospitality - Social Housing in Italy
Emergency Accommodation: Paths to Reception and Hospitality - Social Housing in Italy
Emergency Accommodation: Paths to Reception and Hospitality - Social Housing in Italy
Emergency Accommodation: Paths to Reception and Hospitality - Social Housing in Italy
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Emergency Accommodation: Paths to Reception and Hospitality - Social Housing in Italy

662 views

Published on

Presentation given by Francesca Santaniello, Politecnico di Milano, Italy at a FEANTSA conference on "People who are homeless can be housed:
An insight into successful practices from across Europe", Cardiff, Wales, 2008

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Emergency Accommodation: Paths to Reception and Hospitality - Social Housing in Italy

  1. 1. Emergency accommodation Paths to reception and hospitality Francesca Santaniello Politecnico di Milano, Department of Architecture and Planning fsantaniello@irsonline.it
  2. 2. The storyFondazione Cariplo : important grantmaker in Italy [Lombardy]supports housing intervention from the fist half of 90s though:• no profit sector: accomodation for low income people [socalled ‘second reception’]• promotion of a ‘social real estate fund’: housing - low rents [socalled ‘third reception’][datas about homelessness in Lombardy]in 2006 Fondazione Cariplo:• Identifies a new target: homeless people in urgent need• Giving a new interpretation of old response : hostelPromotes an experimental projectIn 2 territories: Milan [+Varese] and Bergamo[support: Architecture and Planning Department of Politecnico di Milano]
  3. 3. Aims1.• ‘concentration’ [shelters, dormitories..] = no effectiveness:• micro-facilities [local roots/specificity ]2.• focus on individual projects , support to autonomy• [area based social and individual networks]3.• [but?] in a perspective of temporary night accomodation• [‘ready response’ for urgent needs]4.• ‘light’ management models• [reducing costs through local communities involvment]5.• re-insertion paths based on local networks of services• [social, health, employment, housing…] + local communities
  4. 4. Main features1. Context as a variableOne ‘model’ but different projects : characteristics change!2. Experimental approachThe project is not meant as a ‘sure response’ but a possibility to be verify in its impacts and effectiveness3. Project as a processProjects can construct products but above all processes : what is the outcome in term of ideas, networks, other projects triggered [interests by other operators/partners to construct other possibilities…]
  5. 5. Resoureces1. MaterialUnused buildings owned by different actors [Curia, Charities, Foundations…] that can be given for a period [no rent]2. FinanciaryFondazione CariploFunding to restore buildings and fornitures [promote flexible spaces/flexible uses]Funding for management start up for 1 year [self-sustainability oriented]3. Capacities and competenciesLocal organizations NGOs, Charities, Parishes – madiated by Caritas and local networks in Social Plans define projects [social profile of beneficiaries, objectives, strategies of intervention…]4. Technical and creativePolitecnicoExperts/workgroup concentrated on the construction of specific, quality oriented and innovative solutions5. Relational [in perspective]
  6. 6. 2 contexts/2 modelsElements [from context analysis] for ‘models’ porposedMilanContext• Weak [not existent] public policies in fight against homelessness• Organizations: closed and limited networks• High percentage of big structures [shelters and dormitories]• Reinsertion paths not planned or difficoult to be planned or implementedModel• Immediate response to the ‘urgent need’• No ‘filters’ [no intermediaries]• Neighbourhood basis• Activation of local communities [volountaries] in social support
  7. 7. 2 contexts/2 modelsElements [from context analysis] for ‘models’ porposedBergamoContext• Strong network public/private partnership• Cooperation [even if very weak] between social policies and urban policies• Trend: little structures [collective housing]• Reinsertion paths: outcome of public/private partnership and cooperation between organizations [‘system’]Model• Integration of existing ‘reception system’ [improving of the ‘system’]• Filter [intermediaries: other organizations of local ‘system’]• Professional approach to social support
  8. 8. Projects and territories1. Analysis and strategiesPolitecnico supports the process [2006/2007]: 2 work groups to defineproject for spaces and fornitures + facilities and management model2. Involvment of organizations [with different backgrounds and experiences!]14 buildings identified [relationships with owners: Curia, Fondazione Misericordia Maggiore]> 14 groups involved in construction of stretegies [filter: Caritas, Social Area Plan l.328/00]3. ‘Enabler’ position [Fondazione Cariplo]Very temporary + very light management4. Construction of solutionsIn action: rise of problems• for buildings: physical and legal constrains• for facilities: adjustments [social profile, organizational models, specific strategies…]5. OutcomesSelection of buildings/organizations > reduct ‘social impact’
  9. 9. Different projects for different contextsfour examples [not all of them will be implemented, but will found new funding]1. Bovisasca, MilanoPresentParish > group of volountariesDeveloped experience in social reception [little shelter for homeless people]Weak relationship with public policies and other organizationsProjectSocial profile not defined [all those who are in need]Positive reaction to temporary solutions [asked for the strong demand]No physical, legal constrains on building
  10. 10. Different projects for different contextsfour examples [not all of them will be implemented, but will found new funding]2. Caronno Pertusella [Varese]PresentParish > social cooperativeMore structured experience in social receptionWeak relationship with Municilaity, strong with public policies and other organizationsProjectSocial profiole strongly defined [refugees]Quite positive reaction to temporary solutions [already developed more long term ones]High physical and legal constrains on buildings [700s]
  11. 11. Different projects for different contextsfour examples [not all of them will be implemented, but will found new funding]3. BergamoPresentHistorical reception facility, long experience [but also innovation]Network linked to Local Social Plan [public/private coordination] + volountary sectorOrientation to social support to authonomyProjectSocial profile not definedNegative reaction to temporary solutions [do not allow reinsertion paths]Physical constrains on building [other flats]
  12. 12. Different projects for different contextsfour examples [not all of them will be implemented, but will found new funding]4. Sesto San Giovanni [Milano]PresentParish > no organizationNo experience in social receptionWeak relationship with public policies and other organizationsProjectSocial profiole strongly defined [women who attend elders]No reaction to temporary solutions [weak experience]Process limits in planning of physical intervention
  13. 13. Conditions for success[‘system’ perspective]1. Networks already working in an integrate perspective > if not?2. Availability of affordable solutions [more stable and adecuate] > if not?3. Length of stay: short if meant in a wider system of responses [period to understand the problem and set solutions] > if not?
  14. 14. Conditions for success[project perspective]1. Other functions can help local community to develop a ‘relationship’ with new facilities and contribute to financial sustainability > how?2. NGOs and local communities able to promote positive path develop of capacities and competences > how?
  15. 15. Complementary functions [day/night]
  16. 16. Parallel functions [day/night]

×