Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

A Latin American experience with rights-based approaches: Community territorial use rights in the Gulf weakfish (Cynoscion othonopterus) fishery of the Gulf of California, México by A. Minerva Arce Ibarra

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad

Check these out next

1 of 16 Ad
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to A Latin American experience with rights-based approaches: Community territorial use rights in the Gulf weakfish (Cynoscion othonopterus) fishery of the Gulf of California, México by A. Minerva Arce Ibarra (20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

A Latin American experience with rights-based approaches: Community territorial use rights in the Gulf weakfish (Cynoscion othonopterus) fishery of the Gulf of California, México by A. Minerva Arce Ibarra

  1. 1. A Latin American experience with rights- based approaches: Community territorial use rights in the Gulf weakfish (Cynoscion othonopterus) fishery of the Gulf of California, México A. Minerva Arce Ibarra Tenure and Fishing Rights 2015. March 23-27, 2015. Seam Reap, Kingdom of Cambodia
  2. 2. Part I. Scene Setting of the Fishery Demersal species: Cynoscion othonopterus
  3. 3. Part I. Cont. SAGARPA 2012 Gear: Monofilament Gillnets
  4. 4. Part I. Cont.  General situation of the fishery: Competing objectives • Conservation vs Socioeconomic & Cultural Objectives • Natural Protected Areas with endemic endangered species vs Cocopah People: A claim of the nucleus zone area as their ancestral land in which to fish (Spatial M) They acknowledge that their most valued species is the Gulf weakfish
  5. 5. Part I. Cont.  General situation of the fishery:  Fishing effort 2007-2008 Com1 (EGSC) = 463 f.p. Com2 (SnF)= 315 f.p. Com3 (Cocopah)=50 f.p. Com4 (PP)= 199 f.p. Total = 1027 f.p.
  6. 6. PART II. The User-rights story  Motivations to implement a R-B system  NOM-063-PESC-2005. 2007 Fishery Managers: 1. Sustainability criteria: To implement a management system to sustain fish populations 2. Acknowledgement of 3 communities (including the Cocopah people) as traditional users 3. Its fishing season is during reproductive aggregations 4. Its abundance and value ($) result in a race-for-fish 5. It is likely that local fishing operations pose risk to viability of 2 endangered species (Phocoena sinus & Totoaba macdonaldi)
  7. 7. PART II. Cont.  Early 1990’s it was an open access fishery  2007-, it is a regulated-limited entry fishery  2011- A catch quota was set (predetermined harvest control rules lacking) What is: Description The duration of the rights First fishing permit= 2 years; Its renewal= 5 years; “n” renewals The security of rights If user has not infringed law, it is highly secure; but it is dependent upon stock & FO The divisibility of rights Fishing permits are indivisible The transferability of rights Non transferable except if the entitled person dies (inheritable) The exclusivity/ enforceability of rights Each boat (and fishers) based at the designed landing sites/ moderately enforced
  8. 8. PART II. Cont. 1. Social changes: Gender and Youth: Continue participating in the fishery Alternative employment did not emerge Communities/Users have not fully appropriate the R-B S 2. Economic changes Before= After; 1.0 US/Kg to 0.33 U.S/Kg 3. Environmental aspects: Endangered species populations continue deteriorating (Phocoena sinus); National and International pressure Fisheries Management: Mexico from 2001- date Downsized federal fishery institutions; in $, staff
  9. 9. PART III. Looking back and forward: The future of the user rights system in the fishery 1.Top 3 key lessons: a) The R-B S. is a good start b) It gave little improvement to FS and Ecosystem c) A need to discuss competing objectives explicitly to give advice in devising alternative scenarios 2. Thinking about best practices a) Mexican government should issue species- specific fishing permits b) All official landing sites (El Zanjón) should have records of their Gulf weakfish landings c) Communities should know better their R-B- Management
  10. 10. PART III. Cont. The future of the user rights system in the fishery Conclusions a. The complexity of this Fishery System with competing objectives in place poses extra challenges in implementing a R-B system The social side has not fully understand/ use this R- B-System The economic side is far from being efficient and optimal The environmental side: currently several species are still considered as endangered therein.
  11. 11. PART III. Cont. The future of the user rights system in the fishery Recommendations Current entitled fishers should be given a certificate as “stewards of their rights to fish”, which if well administered would result in several types of income Set target and limit reference points for this fishery A thorough fishery monitoring plan scheme (for catch records, stock assessment and enforcement) need to be devised
  12. 12. Thank you!  Acknowledgements:  The User Rights 2015 Forum Organizers
  13. 13. Extra Material  Just in case it is needed to respond questions
  14. 14. FIGURE Time series (in bars) of reported catch of Curvina golfina from 1995 to 2007 to San Felipe, El Golfo de Santa Clara, and Puerto Peñasco. Total catch is represented by the continuous line. Source: Catch records obtained from Rodríguez-Quiróz (2008). 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Tons SanFelipe G.SantaClara P.Peñasco Total Catch Year
  15. 15. Objectives of the Management Plan for the Gulf weakfish (SAGARPA 2012): 1. To sustain fish biomass and its recruitment, 2. To sustain the yield and the economic benefit of the fishery 3. To reduce environmental interactions 4. To promote economic benefits to society; and 5. To look after the high quality of fishing produce

×