Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) for food safety management: A vision from Uruguay

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad

Check these out next

1 of 19 Ad

Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) for food safety management: A vision from Uruguay

Download to read offline

http://tiny.cc/faowgsworkshop
Use of genome sequencing technology on food safety management- Uruguay. Presentation from the FAO expert workshop on practical applications of Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) for food safety management - 7-8 December 2015, Rome, Italy.

http://tiny.cc/faowgsworkshop
Use of genome sequencing technology on food safety management- Uruguay. Presentation from the FAO expert workshop on practical applications of Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) for food safety management - 7-8 December 2015, Rome, Italy.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (20)

Similar to Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) for food safety management: A vision from Uruguay (20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) for food safety management: A vision from Uruguay

  1. 1. WHOLE GENOMIC SEQUENCING A VISION FROM URUGUAY Dra. Ana María Maquieira amaqui@latu.org.uy LATU –URUGUAY
  2. 2. • Surface: 175.016 km2 • Population: 3,286,314 URUGUAY - GENERAL INFORMATION
  3. 3. Economy is based on Agricultural production :
  4. 4. LATU - TECHNOLOGICAL LABORATORY OF URUGUAY
  5. 5. LATU - TECHNOLOGICAL LABORATORY OF URUGUAY
  6. 6. HOW DOES FOOD SAFETY MANAGMENT WORK IN URUGUAY?
  7. 7. FOOD SAFETY MANAGMENT -DIFFERENT ACTORS : PUBLIC HEALTH MINISTERY (MSP) Epidemiology Sanitary police MINISTERY OF LIVESTOCK,AGRICULTURE AND FISH (MGAP) INAC REGIONAL GOVERNMENT (RG) LATU MSP LAB School of Medicine (UDELAR) - Hygiene Institute DILAVE (MGAP LAB) Authorized laboratories RG Food LAB
  8. 8. Normas Nacionales: MSP, MGAP, INAC, Intendencias, LATU. Leyes : Ley Orgánica 9202 del 12/01/1934: MSP policía higiénica de los alimentos Ley 3606/13/04/1910 : MGAP Policía Sanitaria en Sanidad Animal Decretos: Decreto 315/994 – Reglamento Bromatológico Nacional Decreto 338/82: LATU verificación conformidad de alimentos industrializados importados (menos pesca y piensos) Decreto 368/000: MGAP Autoridad Sanitaria Oficial de leche y productos lácteos Decreto 360/003; 576/009 y Resolución 11ª/2010: MGAP Plan Nac. De Residuos Biológicos. Decreto 2/997; 20/998; 177/004 y 135/005: MGAP Condiciones de Higiene para Tambos TRAZABILIDAD - Ley 17.997 (2006) Ordenanzas Municipales Food Regulations - examples
  9. 9. National situation Foodborne diseases
  10. 10. Distribution of the foodborne diseases outbreaks reported (1993-2014, Graciela Naviliat MSP - 2014) N
  11. 11. Distribution of outbreaks of ETA by etiological agent (2014) Sepi 45 (Graciela Naviliat MSP)
  12. 12. SWOT – FODA WGS
  13. 13. STRENGTHSSmall country: • Our longest distance is 665 kms • “We know each other” on food safety. • Possibility of sharing resources. Knowledge: • Training on this topic is actually developing (ex. Masters in Bioinformatics- Science University) • Research groups working on sequencing (Instituto Pasteur and Clemente) Regulations: • There is a national code on diseases and health reportable events • Existence of an Integrated Health System.
  14. 14. Evento de Notificación Obligatoria Notification must be performed within the first 24 h ( “A Group” of the Reportable Mandatory Diseases Code, 2012) to the Surveillance Department of the Ministry of Public Health. Tel: 2 409-12-00. Fax: 2 408-58-38 o al e-mail: vigilanciaepi@msp.gub.uy on line system www.msp.gub.uy
  15. 15. OPPORTUNITIES • Knowledge of the sourranding flora’s characteristics. • Use of an advanced methodology. • Possibility of deeper epidemiology studies . • Improvements on chain production.
  16. 16. WEAKNESSESNetworks: • Weakness in scientists institution´s networks • Food Safety Authorities` networks need strengthening. Knowledge: • No shared information, food safety data not easily available . • Fragmented information, it´s generated only in especific areas, difficulty in traceabiliy. • Therefore , information is poor at the moment of decision making (regulations, risk assessment ,etc.) Economic resources: • Resources needed for equipment, training and supplies. • Training of teams in data processing.
  17. 17. WEAKNESSES Epidemiology: • Inmature epidemiology system in food area. • Underreporting • Poorly defined reportable diseases Methodology • Need for further development on WGS for use in food testing (no need of strain isolation).
  18. 18. TREATHS• High cost. • Need of training on the methodology • Not all the authorities know about WGS methodology. • Low undersatnding of the usefullness of WGS. • “NASA” methodology – “A Ferrari in a stone street” • Confidence in the use of databases. • Fear of trade barriers.
  19. 19. THANK YOU/MUCHAS GRACIAS

×