Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Strengthening data sharing for public health: ethical, legal and political issues

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad

Check these out next

1 of 14 Ad

Strengthening data sharing for public health: ethical, legal and political issues

Download to read offline

http://www.fao.org/about/meetings/wgs-on-food-safety-management/en/

Strengthening data sharing for public health: ethical, legal and political issues. Presentation from the Technical Meeting on the impact of Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) on food safety management and GMI-9, 23-25 May 2016, Rome, Italy.

http://www.fao.org/about/meetings/wgs-on-food-safety-management/en/

Strengthening data sharing for public health: ethical, legal and political issues. Presentation from the Technical Meeting on the impact of Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) on food safety management and GMI-9, 23-25 May 2016, Rome, Italy.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (20)

Similar to Strengthening data sharing for public health: ethical, legal and political issues (20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

Strengthening data sharing for public health: ethical, legal and political issues

  1. 1. Strengthening data sharing for public health: ethical, legal and political issues Michael Edelstein, Consultant Research Fellow Centre for Global Health Security, Chatham House @epi_michael GMI9 Conference , 23-25 May 2016
  2. 2. 2 Overview • Barriers to data sharing • Data sharing: creating the right environment and achieving good practice • Making data sharing the norm Chatham House | The Royal Institute of International Affairs
  3. 3. 3 Sharing public health surveillance data • Sharing data improves public health • Health implications of not sharing • Sharing public health surveillance data is not the norm • Six main barrier categories • Technical • Legal • Ethical • Political • Motivational • Economic Chatham House | The Royal Institute of International Affairs
  4. 4. Chatham House | The Royal Institute of International Affairs 4 Ethics issues • Lack of reciprocity and shared benefits • H5N1 specimens in Indonesia • Privacy and confidentiality • Lack of proportionality, data misuse • Data harvesting
  5. 5. Chatham House | The Royal Institute of International Affairs 5 Legal issues • Few global legal frameworks • IHR • Complex legal landscape • National vs Regional vs Global • Used as an excuse not to share • One-sided agreements
  6. 6. Chatham House | The Royal Institute of International Affairs 6 Political issues • Perceived political, economic risk • Risk-averse policies • Few incentives
  7. 7. Chatham House | The Royal Institute of International Affairs 7 Strengthening Data Sharing for Public Health • Providing guidance to create the right environment and achieve good practice • Targeting three stakeholder groups: • Data producers • Data users • Data facilitators • High-level and context-specific guidance
  8. 8. 8 Work to date • Briefing papers • Barriers and solutions • Lessons from other sectors • Strategic round tables • Thematic round tables • Legal, Ethics, standards, DDD • Regional round tables • Asia, Africa • Guidance expected October 2016 • Online and hard copy Chatham House | The Royal Institute of International Affairs
  9. 9. 9 Outputs High-level principles for data sharing 1. Articulating the value proposition 2. Planning for data sharing 3. Ensuring high-quality data production 4. Collaborating in creating data-sharing agreements 5. Building trust and being consistent 6. Understanding the context-specific legal implications 7. Monitoring and evaluating progress Chatham House | The Royal Institute of International Affairs
  10. 10. 10 Ethics • Public health purpose and data protection • Sharing benefits • Global ethical framework • Ethical principles for data sharing 1. Social Value 2. Respect 3. Justice 4. Transparency Chatham House | The Royal Institute of International Affairs
  11. 11. 11 Guide to Developing Data-Sharing Agreements • Legal instruments are tools, not barriers • Context specific • Two-way, equitable agreements • Guide to Developing Data-Sharing Agreements • Legally vs non legally binding (MoU) • Addresses ethical barriers including shared benefits • Model agreement to provide necessary language Chatham House | The Royal Institute of International Affairs
  12. 12. 12 Public Health Surveillance: A Call to Share Data Chatham House | The Royal Institute of International Affairs • “The norm should be for data to be accessible in a timely manner for public health action while taking appropriate steps to safeguard the privacy of individuals and other legitimate public interests” • “The consequences of making a decision to withhold data can be critical, and those considering such a decision must be ready to justify their actions” • “Unacceptable for organizations to claim ownership of, and restrict access to, public health surveillance data when that would decrease potential health benefits derived from these data”
  13. 13. 13 Public Health Surveillance: A Call to Share Data Chatham House | The Royal Institute of International Affairs • We call on stakeholders to commit to the following: • To share public health surveillance data by default where a public health need is identified, in a timeframe necessary for public health decision-making and to the highest standards they can achieve. • To use public health surveillance data responsibly, with the intention of protecting and improving the health of the population and in accordance with the agreed terms • To articulate the value proposition for sharing in an explicit, clear, and accessible way - the benefits should be evident to all • To ensure that public health surveillance data are shared with as few restrictions as possible, and with a commitment to principles of social beneficence, respect, justice and transparency.
  14. 14. Thank you Chatham House | The Royal Institute of International Affairs Prof David R Harper Senior Consulting Fellow, Centre on Global Health Security Matthew Brack Project Manager, Centre on Global Health Security Asha Herten-Crabb Project Coordinator, Centre on Global Health Security

Editor's Notes

  • Based on previous conversations, I thought you might like an intro slide. There seem to be the two main components of the talk: the broad introcuction to the issues, and then what we’re doing on the project to address them. However, it also occurred to me that the title of the talk plays very much to the idea of “creating the right environment” (i.e. these are not really technical issues), so you may want to draw some sort of distinction between these areas at the outset.
  • Based on previous conversations, I thought you might like an intro slide. There seem to be the two main components of the talk: the broad introcuction to the issues, and then what we’re doing on the project to address them. However, it also occurred to me that the title of the talk plays very much to the idea of “creating the right environment” (i.e. these are not really technical issues), so you may want to draw some sort of distinction between these areas at the outset.
  • I’ve given you one slide on the key themes, with barriers and solutions presented for each – mostly drawn from your background paper.
  • Basic intro to the project. I would say something here about how the barriers have been well identified and it’s time for solutions, which is the focus of our project.
  • I’ve had to cut out your nice arrow-and-box configuration to fit everything in.
  • You may want to emphasise how these will help the political side of things here, as you currently have slides following specifically on ethics and legal solutions. Or you could hit on political solutions throughout. I suppose that, unlike some other barriers, we haven’t yet addressed politics in a very direct way.
  • Seems important given the title of the presentation.
  • I’ve slightly changed how I talked about the legal document(s) at ISDS – again, given the title, this may also be useful as it covers our approach to the legal side. I think you can simply refer to all of those operational documents (i.e. the model, annotations, templates, guides) as the “Guide” for now, as we’re still working out how they all fit together.
  • You could talk about the website here. It might form another step that would fill out the slide a little better…
  • You could talk about the website here. It might form another step that would fill out the slide a little better…

×